Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-21-2008, 05:20 PM
Tbohs
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 15
S Class advice wanted

I have decided to buy a mid to late 90s S Class sedan and would like some advice. I am a knowledgeabel car guy (wife has Jag VandenPlas, daughter a MB 190E 2.6 that I help maintain) but I am not familiar with the S cars I am interested in. I would only put about 5-6K miles per year on car.

1. What are the pros and cons of the 420 vs 500 vs 320/six engines?
2. Are some years better than others?
3. What are the major problem areas to watch out for?
2. What about the 12-cylinder 600s? My recollection is that the old 6.9-liter V8s were extremely expensive to work on and troublesom to own. I probably don't want to go there. But I had a Jag V12 on two occasions and they were OK.

Much thanks to forum gearheads,

Tom Bohs

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-21-2008, 07:07 PM
A. Rosich's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 883
Try reading this, it would help on most of your topics:

S-Class Fiasco: W220 vs W140
__________________
A. Rosich
CL 500, 1998
S 500 L, 1998
E 320 T, 1995 [Sadly sold ]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-22-2008, 12:21 PM
Tbohs
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 15
Great recommendation

Wow. Thanks for that recommendation. Tons of info!

Tom Bohs
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-22-2008, 02:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 165
1998-1999 S-Class

Go for a 1998 or 1999 S320- Remarkable car! Economical and Reliable, great every day drive... The S500 is worth the little bit more over the S420/ I would go with either the S320 or the S500 depending on what your needs are. Lots of luck! You're gonna love it!

Only reason I fret from the 1997 is that it is the first year of the 722.6 5-Speed Electronic Transmission and there were issues there. A 1999 with a final build date of 4/09 would be the most ideal!!!!!
__________________
My Work:
Mercedes-Benz Manhattan, Inc.
Business Development
536 West 41st Street
New York, NY 10036

-My Garage-
1996 E320: White 118,000 miles ~Dad's Driver~
1996 E320: Green 109,000 miles ~Mom's Driver~
~My Babies~
2000 SL500: Desert Sand 96,000 miles
-Previoulsy Judge Judy's-
2008 E350 4MATIC Sport
-Flint Grey/ Ash/ Black Birds Eye Maple-
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-22-2008, 08:00 PM
A. Rosich's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 883
Actually, the first year of the 722.6 5-speed automatic transmission was 1996 and only very early production models gave real trouble (like the new 7G transmission gave trouble with the very early production W221s).

A late production 96, a 97/98 or 99, with low miles and with proper maintenance records would be an excellent and safe choice.

Personally I prefer the S 500 over the S 320, but if you do a lot of town driving an S 320 would provide you with a slightly better MPG.

Just be sure to check all electrical systems and any fluids leaks. The smallest sign of something not working properly can mean big $$$ trouble later on.

But if everything checks out, the W140 is definitely and without a doubt the best Mercedes-Benz ride you can buy.

__________________
A. Rosich
CL 500, 1998
S 500 L, 1998
E 320 T, 1995 [Sadly sold ]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page