Maybe a T124 in there for hauling?

__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff

I once worked for a major multi-national engineering based company with over 100,000 employees. The managers and directors at nearly every level had a technical background.

One of the directors once told me that all managers and directors must be chosen from engineering background. Sales ,marketting or bean counters were not to be allocated to major responsibility with decision making ability.
Why? Because they sold futures. - The fastest road to a downhill slide.
That company has since been metamorphed into a sales oriented company and is now a fifth of the size it was 20 years ago - and struggling.

Unfortunately that is the modern way.

The Lexus paved the way for the fickle minded mass buyers and their hankering for gadgets over outright engineering.

Some say that the modern M.B.'s are much better cars than the older generations - not in engineering terms though. Newer vehicles might be deemed "better to drive" and appear to be safer, however they don't have that "engineered like no other car feel".

In another respect. The engineering company I referred to above manufactured electro- mechanical equipment which had a forty year lifetime gaurantee. With proper maintainance this equipment would last for up to 100 years. Compare that to the modern turnaround of capotal equipment.

I've seen the bean counter management up close and personal!

I got in on the ground floor of a niche software company that was founded and built by an Electrical Engineer. His management and business skills were marginal, but effective enough. His understanding of our technology and how to promote it was outstanding. We built the company at a minimum 100% annual growth rate for about 8 years. At that time the owner sold out and the venture capital bean counters came in.

After that we never had a CEO with ANY industry experience whatsoever. Worse yet, he started bringing in his own upper management people with even less industry experience. His ongoing mission was to prepare for the next Board of Directors meeting. These guys drove the company into oblivion costing lots of jobs and lost careers.

There is an old movie that is VERY interesting and dramatizes this. It is entitled "Executive Suite." It is from about 1953. In it, a bean counter is trying to take over the company and truly believes that it's all about dividends, ignoring any reality regarding the need for developing and building a quality product. I highly recommend the movie if you want to understand what happened to MB. They show it on TCM quite often.

BTW, I had a GREAT career in that company and had some really good years and luckily managed to put away some money. I'm now in a boring job and just marking time until retirement. I was lucky to have that experience in my career.

Well, having owned my 124 since new, now 22 years, I readily admit to my bias. I have close friends with almost all forms of MBs, including the 210, 211 and 212. What beautiful, pleasurable vehicles to sit in and to drive. Despite my bias, the differences with my 124 are easily recognizable. But what's also obvious, is that MB is following the herd in turning cars into rolling arcades. It's a triumph of gadgetry over engineering. Of course, I'll be proved wrong if, in 20+ years, these models are rolling strong, as mine is, with nary so much as a light bulb inop. Testimonial done!

__________________
1988 California version 260E (W124)
Anthracite Grey/Palomino
Owned since new and still going strong and smooth
MBCA member

Past Mercedes-Benz:
1986 190E Baby Benz
1967 230 Inherited from mom when she downsized
1959 220S Introduced me to the joys of keepin' 'em goin'

There are only 10 kinds of people in the world--those who understand binary and those who don't

Here's the thing - MB's design to production cycle for a new vehicle is about 7 years or so. This refers to the time that transpires from a blank sheet of paper to a car that is rolling off the production line. Given this length of time, and given that the "merger" took place in 1998, it is *impossible* for any car introduced and in the showroom by 1998 to have any DCX influence.

When Daimler bought Chrysler, it was never to harness Chrysler's engineering potential. It was never to ride the coattails of Chrysler's sterling retuptation for quality or value. It wasn't even for their distribution network (which is why Fiat bought them). It was to extend the life of obsolete tooling and production that MB had finished with. W210 architecture shows up in the 300E and Charger after it goes out of production in Germany, along with 722.6 transmissions when they start moving towards the end of their life cycles. The entire first generation SLK chassis gets a new lease on life under the body of a Chrysler Crossfire (manufactured in Austria by Magna Steyr). MB diesel engines show up in Jeep products prior to the introduction of BlueTec. The Dodge Sprinter van shows up with only the badges changed from MB product. MB's last generation hand-me-downs were going to be better than anything Chrysler could engineer at the time - it was a way to ammortize the cost on engineering for MB over a longer amount of time.

The fact that MB quality took a dive at about the same time of the merger was a coincidence that had nothing to do with the merger. It had more to do with a change in design and engineering philosophy at MB.

__________________
Jonathan

2011 Mazda2
2000 E320 4Matic Wagon
1994 C280 (retired)

Yeah Lexus, I remember it well, hearing about it from my brother constantly, ... what a huge success it was to bring a Toyota Senator over from Japan, put an L on the hood, and sell it to all of the quick-fix generation that didn't want to research past the commercials and brochure.

Yes it had better fit and finish, quieter? Probably, I wasn't too impressed with my Father's SC400 though, felt like a gold-encrusted Supra and was a crappy drive at speed (although great around town and in mall parking lots).

What Lexus did was marketing, started with a market (target buyer will make $xx/year, will pay $yy, expects zz from 0-60, expects these features, has this many children, is married or ??, etc., etc.) and built a car around that market / target buyer. Did it well, I know the guys who did all of that work, and didn't spend an extra nickle on anything that wouldn't show and improve its perceived value.

A good car for sure, hit right in the Audi market and well below Mercedes prices which was part of Mercedes' change from the only major automaker to price their cars using a cost-plus-margin formula to a market-driven pricing formula, and drove Mercedes pricing down. This forced Mercedes to do the same thing: eliminate the things that made a Mercedes a Mercedes, unless the buyer would see it and perceive it as an added value. Things like forged control arms? Not seen, stamped steel are cheaper, ... etc.

So did the Lexus cars change the automotive landscape and Mercedes-Benz's direction? No, the generation of buyers, who want to sign and drive, trade frequently, and rely on J.D. Powers' "initial quality survey" results to tell them if a car is quality or not (a survey sent to new-car buyers within their first 90-days' ownership to gauge quality) which indicated only whether the customer was exited about their car new, not whether it actually lasted past 90 days and went the distance without serious problems.

Mercedes didn't really let us down on the wiring issues, MBUSA did. They made the decisions whether to cover with a warranty or good-will campaign, not Mercedes-Benz in Germany. I had similar issues with VWUS and Audi in the early-mid '80s, customer service basically sucked, ... until the Japanese companies decided to kill them with kindness (to their customers) and put service first. That also changed the way that Detroit did business, ... a little.

__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff

Well said babymog, neanderthal, lkchris and others. Unquestionably, upscale Japanese brands threw the traditional luxury car market into a tailspin with both product and customer service. But surely, changing consumer outlooks about what constitutes "luxury" in an automobile have played a significant role too. The instant gratification, short attention span, gotta-have-the-latest-electronic-gadget generation didn't respond well to the notion that quality is in the build, not in what you tack on to make the driving experience seem as much as possible like a home theater. And, as already mentioned, these buyers are on a replacement cycle having nothing to do with the automobile, but only when the latest generation of electronic toy gets added to the new models. That's about every couple of years. Design and build quality won't ever be an issue for them, and so, customer preference will inevitably drive the build decisions of the manufacturers, MBz included. That's not a bad thing; just a commentary on how we got where we are, and why some of us hang onto our 22 year old 124s, even when they don't have CD players.

__________________
1988 California version 260E (W124)
Anthracite Grey/Palomino
Owned since new and still going strong and smooth
MBCA member

Past Mercedes-Benz:
1986 190E Baby Benz
1967 230 Inherited from mom when she downsized
1959 220S Introduced me to the joys of keepin' 'em goin'

There are only 10 kinds of people in the world--those who understand binary and those who don't

CD player ??? what about elementary cupholders?

If you need cupholders, ... you're not driving fast enough.

__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff

The top three reasons I own a 124C.

3. Incredibly stylish for it's age (1988) Still a head turner.

2. It'll get up and go all day long, with ease and comfort and as quickly as you want to get there.

1. This: R.I.P my beloved 300CE

It is against the law to drink any beverage while driving in Germany. That explains their long delay for the addition of cupholders.

I was on my way from Eindhoven, Netherlands to Hamburg, Germany. Just over the border into Germany I stopped at a fuel stop convenience store and bought a drink of some kind, I don't remember exactly what it was. I took it to the car to drink before I got on the Autobahn to let it rip. Everyone who saw me step out the door with that drink, eyeballed me hard. It was as if I had just robbed the place.

Germans spend more hours and almost as much money to get a drivers license in Germany than we do to get a PILOTS license here in the US. They are taught to pay attention to their driving. They don't drink coffee when they drive. They don't eat a sandwich when they drive. They're not even allowed to have a child under 10 years old in the front seat when they drive. That's why they have no speed limits on their Autobahn system, but have fewer fatalities per mile driven than any other highway system in the world.

Agree 100% - We should have car that require attention and knowledge of what are you doing. Last S class(W126) with 5 speed manual is 1984, E (W124) class is from 1988.

Well the last year for a manual C Class was 2001 or maybe the following year as well. I was fortunate to drive one of those and also to still have my five speed manual 1988 300E. These are the last years for manual transmissions in the US. When I go to Europe I lust after all the great MB's over there with manual transmissions.

Shows you how lazy American drivers have gotten. I personally have NO vehicles with automatic transmissions except my wife has an automatic transmissioned Mini Cooper.

I have a pickup, a Vette, my 300E and a new Mustang GT, all with manuals. I have no interest in owning and driving automatic transmisssion vehicles. I don't like driving them. I don't like maintaining them. I don't like repairing them.

Both of my kids are grown and drive manuals. They get lots of comments from friends asking where they learned. I made a point of teaching them to drive a manual transmission car and wouldn't allow them to drive an automatic until they learned in a stick first.

Might want to fact-check a bit.

Gilly

__________________
Click here to see the items I have up for auction at EBay

Click here to see a photo album of my '62 Sprite Project Moneypit (Now Sold)

The manual transmission Mercedes available in USA for 2010 are:

C300
SLK300

__________________
Kent Christensen
Albuquerque
'07 GL320CDI, '10 CL550. '01 Porsche Boxster
Two BMW motorcycles