Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 05-11-2010, 01:48 PM
is thinning the herd
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 3,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by babymog View Post

The 124, 201, early 140s, and R129 were the last IMO of the Engineers' cars. Marketing decided much more after this point.

Mercedes-Benz never merged with Chrysler, that was how it was sold to us here in America. Daimler-Benz bought Chrysler, lost their asses and their repution, built some Chrysler cars using old W210 suspension parts, and sold Chrysler at a garage-sale. Bad move that purchase.

The 124 is IMO the best-built and Engineered mid-size car ever, was my favorite as an Engineer and as an owner of many. The early are great cars, later ones better refined and appointed, no difference in quality. The chassis IIRC is 30% high-tensile steel, I don't believe that any other manufacturer has ever bothered to spend the money to create a car with the natural frequency of the W124, it was however benchmarked by every car manufacturer in the world.

Long live the Mercedes 124.
+1

Exactly what I was going to say, just worded much better and from someone more reputable

edit: quote snipped.

__________________
68 280SL - 70 280SL - 70 300SEL 3.5 - 72 350SL - 72 280SEL 4.5 - 72 220 - 72 220D - 73 450SL - 84 230GE - 87 200TD - 90 190E 2.0 - 03 G500

Nissan GTR - Nissan Skyline GTS25T - Toyota GTFour - Rover Mini - Toyota Land Cruiser HJ60 - Cadillac Eldorado - BMW E30 - BMW 135i

Last edited by DieselPaul; 05-13-2010 at 09:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-11-2010, 02:29 PM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
Yes, my younger brother was Product Planner, All New Vehicles, for Lexus at that time. I remember it well, how successful they were at bringing over a Japanese-market Toyota and re-branding. Good show.

The 211(and even the 210) is more refined, more powerful, and definately nicer to drive. I don't agree that it is as well engineered however, too much emphasis on FEM/CAD/etc. to minimize weight, cost, and material. Still very good cars, just didn't have the longevity built in that the earlier models had.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lkchris View Post
Actually it was Lexus. Indirectly, of course.

No W212 diesels in the USA yet, but I can say without hesitation that there is NOTHING about the W124 that even comes close to the W211. The latter is a fantastically better car.

Have owned W123, W124 (2), W210, and W211.

I'm relatively certain most W124 owners would be blown away even by a W210 with the V6 and--especially--the five-speed transmission. Smoother in all ways than the iron-engined W124s and no headgasket leaks, either. Even our diesel is a rocketship compared to a dog 300E, and 2700 highway rpms (V6) or 2100 highway rpms (OM648) sure is nicer than 3400.
__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-11-2010, 02:49 PM
compu_85's Avatar
Cruisin on Electric Ave.
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: La Conner, WA
Posts: 5,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncc.1701 View Post
The first mass-prod car with accelerator-by-wire is ... 1994-1995 W124.
Try again VW/Audi introduced the TDI in 1989. But I guess we didn't specify gas or diesel.

-J
__________________
1991 350SDL. 230,000 miles (new motor @ 150,000). Blown head gasket

Tesla Model 3. 205,000 miles. Been to 48 states!
Past: A fleet of VW TDIs.... including a V10,a Dieselgate Passat, and 2 ECOdiesels.
2014 Cadillac ELR
2013 Fiat 500E.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-11-2010, 02:57 PM
Fold on dotted line
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SE Mich
Posts: 3,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by benzborg View Post
A bit off topic perhaps but I'm trying to find links to put a raging debate to bed. My aging Benz mechanic who spent years working for Mercedes in Germany has for some years expressed his conviction that after the late eighties he won't touch any 300Es since as he says it "That's when Chrysler started making them". He's even pointed out to me how early 300E rear end suspension was downgraded to very light control arms in the rear compared to eariler 80s 300Es. That parts in general weren't as reliable as the earlier MBs and paint, quality of metal etc went downhill as well.

Since then whenever I raise this issue debate follows and being unable to find any links that point to anything the "old boy" is on about I'm wondering if he knows something we don't or does he have his wires crossed altogether?


thanks in advance.

BB
He has his wires crossed altogether.

The actual culprit of this was Juergen Schrempp, when he ran Mercedes and tried to make money by making everything cheaper. Look at the difference between the 123 and 124 models and those which followed.

Schrempp almost got canned as MB chief before he became Daimler Chief, because of this. So he elevated Prof. Dr. Huebbert to run MB engineering and that's when things improved until the good professor retired about 2001-2.

I found this out through my conversations with German engineers who came to Chrysler's Auburn Hills facility, aka CTC, during that period.

He may be the boss and he may be German, but they hated his penny-pinching for bigger bigger profits and bonuses.

Fortunately, he's totally out of the picture, although Dieter hasn't been much better. But then neither is Wolfgang Bernd.

Andreas Renschler, if he's still around, might be a better CEO, because he is more hands-off and lets engineers do their job.
__________________
Strelnik
Invest in America: Buy a Congressman!

1950 170SD
1951 Citroen 11BN
1953 Citroen 11BNF limo
1953 220a project
1959 180D
1960 190D
1960 Borgward Isabella TS 2dr
1983 240D daily driver
1983 380SL
1990 350SDL daily driver alt
3 x Citroen DS21M, down from 5
3 x Citroen 2CV, down from 6
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-11-2010, 03:01 PM
Fold on dotted line
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SE Mich
Posts: 3,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselPaul View Post
+1

Exactly what I was going to say, just worded much better and from someone more reputable
Paul,
Did you work at Auburn Hills? If so, when?
__________________
Strelnik
Invest in America: Buy a Congressman!

1950 170SD
1951 Citroen 11BN
1953 Citroen 11BNF limo
1953 220a project
1959 180D
1960 190D
1960 Borgward Isabella TS 2dr
1983 240D daily driver
1983 380SL
1990 350SDL daily driver alt
3 x Citroen DS21M, down from 5
3 x Citroen 2CV, down from 6
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-11-2010, 03:44 PM
Respect to engineers
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ontario, north of the border
Posts: 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by compu_85 View Post
Try again VW/Audi introduced the TDI in 1989. But I guess we didn't specify gas or diesel.

-J

accepted and apology offered. Actually in Europe I got Polo SDI and no hybrid approaches in simplicity and fuel economy to this 700kg, 55 hp diesel.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-11-2010, 04:47 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
Just a partisan point to make.

The design of the W124 was derived from the W201, which is the most "over engineeered" modern day Mercedes.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-11-2010, 04:49 PM
mbzman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 604
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkchris View Post
Actually it was Lexus. Indirectly, of course.

No W212 diesels in the USA yet, but I can say without hesitation that there is NOTHING about the W124 that even comes close to the W211. The latter is a fantastically better car.

Have owned W123, W124 (2), W210, and W211.

I'm relatively certain most W124 owners would be blown away even by a W210 with the V6 and--especially--the five-speed transmission. Smoother in all ways than the iron-engined W124s and no headgasket leaks, either. Even our diesel is a rocketship compared to a dog 300E, and 2700 highway rpms (V6) or 2100 highway rpms (OM648) sure is nicer than 3400.

I had the opportunity to speak to a W211 owner while at the local dealership a couple of months back. I believe the car in question was either a 2004 or 2005 E320 which he had purchased new. He went on to tell me that the car has spent a lot of time in the shop for various electrical gremlins including the dreaded SBC system. The car had racked up closed to 170,000 km since he drove it long distances for business. He told me he had preferred his former 1992 300E for its mechanical and electrical simplicity and reliability.

I guess we can agree that the newer cars will be better is aspects of safety, technology and refinement, but these things do not replace the high standard engineering mindset that the older cars were built upon. To say that a newer Benz is a fantastically better car is only true in a few aspects.
__________________
1989 300CE
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-11-2010, 06:03 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
The W124 is indeed one of the best MB's ever.....if I had a collection of C124, W124, C126, and W126, I'd be set for life.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-11-2010, 07:28 PM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
Maybe a T124 in there for hauling?
__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-11-2010, 09:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 845
I once worked for a major multi-national engineering based company with over 100,000 employees. The managers and directors at nearly every level had a technical background.

One of the directors once told me that all managers and directors must be chosen from engineering background. Sales ,marketting or bean counters were not to be allocated to major responsibility with decision making ability.
Why? Because they sold futures. - The fastest road to a downhill slide.
That company has since been metamorphed into a sales oriented company and is now a fifth of the size it was 20 years ago - and struggling.

Unfortunately that is the modern way.

The Lexus paved the way for the fickle minded mass buyers and their hankering for gadgets over outright engineering.

Some say that the modern M.B.'s are much better cars than the older generations - not in engineering terms though. Newer vehicles might be deemed "better to drive" and appear to be safer, however they don't have that "engineered like no other car feel".

In another respect. The engineering company I referred to above manufactured electro- mechanical equipment which had a forty year lifetime gaurantee. With proper maintainance this equipment would last for up to 100 years. Compare that to the modern turnaround of capotal equipment.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-12-2010, 07:31 AM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've seen the bean counter management up close and personal!

I got in on the ground floor of a niche software company that was founded and built by an Electrical Engineer. His management and business skills were marginal, but effective enough. His understanding of our technology and how to promote it was outstanding. We built the company at a minimum 100% annual growth rate for about 8 years. At that time the owner sold out and the venture capital bean counters came in.

After that we never had a CEO with ANY industry experience whatsoever. Worse yet, he started bringing in his own upper management people with even less industry experience. His ongoing mission was to prepare for the next Board of Directors meeting. These guys drove the company into oblivion costing lots of jobs and lost careers.

There is an old movie that is VERY interesting and dramatizes this. It is entitled "Executive Suite." It is from about 1953. In it, a bean counter is trying to take over the company and truly believes that it's all about dividends, ignoring any reality regarding the need for developing and building a quality product. I highly recommend the movie if you want to understand what happened to MB. They show it on TCM quite often.

BTW, I had a GREAT career in that company and had some really good years and luckily managed to put away some money. I'm now in a boring job and just marking time until retirement. I was lucky to have that experience in my career.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-12-2010, 08:44 AM
Cal Learner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Marysville, CA
Posts: 781
Well, having owned my 124 since new, now 22 years, I readily admit to my bias. I have close friends with almost all forms of MBs, including the 210, 211 and 212. What beautiful, pleasurable vehicles to sit in and to drive. Despite my bias, the differences with my 124 are easily recognizable. But what's also obvious, is that MB is following the herd in turning cars into rolling arcades. It's a triumph of gadgetry over engineering. Of course, I'll be proved wrong if, in 20+ years, these models are rolling strong, as mine is, with nary so much as a light bulb inop. Testimonial done!
__________________
1988 California version 260E (W124)
Anthracite Grey/Palomino
Owned since new and still going strong and smooth
MBCA member

Past Mercedes-Benz:
1986 190E Baby Benz
1967 230 Inherited from mom when she downsized
1959 220S Introduced me to the joys of keepin' 'em goin'

There are only 10 kinds of people in the world--those who understand binary and those who don't
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-12-2010, 09:24 AM
teezer's Avatar
ex minutiae manager
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by compu_85 View Post
Try again VW/Audi introduced the TDI in 1989. But I guess we didn't specify gas or diesel.

-J
actually bmw did it with their 1987/88 750il

strelnik hit the nail on the head with Juergen Schrempp

i remember when the 190/300e debuted, just shook my head at all the plastic and cheapness compared to past models
__________________
1989 300ce smoke silver / brazil, in a constant state of flux ~~~
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-12-2010, 09:28 AM
oldsinner111's Avatar
lied to for years
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elizabethton, TN
Posts: 6,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by teezer View Post
actually bmw did it with their 1987/88 750il

i remember when the 190/300e debuted, just shook my head at all the plastic and cheapness compared to past models
He is right my 99 w140 is made cheaper than my w126.Fabric headliners versus tough w126 vinyl

__________________
1999 w140, quit voting to old, and to old to fight, a god damned veteran, deutschland deutschland uber alles uber alles in der welt
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page