Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-26-2010, 05:01 AM
Luke Mahon
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 96
M103 300E engine swap compatability.

So the 300E has had a slight moment, and decided to shoot a piston out the side of the engine block. Lovely.

Down to business, am I best to stick with an M103, or should I upgrade the engine, or go for more economy while I'm at it? a 2.6 perhaps?

Although it would be easier to stick with the 3.0 M103, if anyone has swapped engines successfully I'd be interested in other options.
(And if anyone in Victoria by any chance has one for under 1K, which is the current price I have on one)
I only need the main block. My trans. injection etc is fine.

Cheers guys...

__________________
1971 280SE - The S Class
1974 280CE - Sterling
1988 300E - Stanley
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-26-2010, 07:03 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 844
Got a M103 3.0 litre in Campbellfield with 80,000Ks on it for around those dollars. Comes with head and accouterments. There's a workshop there where you can fit the engine.
P.M. me if you need a contact number.
It's got it's 80,000 K transmission attached to it - if you interested in that as well.
Engine came from a 300e.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-26-2010, 07:49 AM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Go with a 103. The 2.6 would offer no significant fuel economy gain and going to a 104 would be a nightmare given all the electronics changes that would be necessary.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-26-2010, 11:06 AM
BAD300's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 510
Why would you opt for a less powerful engine? The M103 is as tuff as they come.....never do this man!
__________________

um.....why have men got nipples
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-27-2010, 02:23 AM
ps2cho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Posts: 3,525
As LarryBible said, don't get the 2.6L.

You will find a lack of power with A/C and a few people in the car. Compared to my 3L it is noticeable on load....Stick with the 3L for sure. It doesn't even get any better fuel economy due to the increase of foot needed.
__________________
2016 Monsoon Gray Audi Allroad - 21k
2008 Black Mercedes E350 4Matic Sport - 131k
2014 Jeep Wranger Unlimited Sahara - 62k
2003 Gray Mercedes ML350 - 122k

Last edited by ps2cho; 08-27-2010 at 02:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-27-2010, 06:29 AM
Luke Mahon
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 96
I was simply pondering on the 2.6 due to the possible increase in fuel economy.

Have decided to stick with the 103 3.0Litre.

What rough costs are you looking at to fit an engine... I suspect I may be getting ripped off.

__________________
1971 280SE - The S Class
1974 280CE - Sterling
1988 300E - Stanley
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2018 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page