![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I tried Porterfield brake pads some years back. They did produce somewhat less brake dust than Textar or MB genuine brake pads, but required significantly more brake pedal force so I switched back to Textar brake pads and Kleen Wheels after a few months.
__________________
Fred Hoelzle |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Akebono Ceramic Pads
Brembo Rotors
Quiet,Fade-Free,'near Dustless stops!
__________________
'84 300SD sold 124.128 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
oem vs porterfield
While this is an older post from another website, the findings might be interesting. http://www.benzworld.org/forums/r170-slk-class/94308-oem-versus-porterfield-brake-pads-some.html
__________________
Achieving failure is no accomplishment, yet learning from it is. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
That has not been my experience. I have found that the Porterfield's provide the best stopping power I've found while providing much less dust on my wheels. In addition, I got all of this without greater pedal pressure. R4-S pads in conjunction with ATE Premium one slotted rotors work perfectly for me.
__________________
Achieving failure is no accomplishment, yet learning from it is. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
With slotted rotors you've essentially redesigned the brake system. I'll defer to the MB automotive engineers.
__________________
Fred Hoelzle |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I'd probably just go with some bigger later brakes if I was redesigning..
Just update from the factory parts bin of course you cannot run the factory whimpy 15 inch tires with bigger brakes. I got a used set of R129 wheels(500E) which are 16's and work well. Michael |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
.
__________________
Achieving failure is no accomplishment, yet learning from it is. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|