Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2011, 10:04 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 30
low front end w201

My new to me 93 w201 2.3L seems to be sitting much lower in the front than it should. The previous owner put in new OEM springs, and I just installed new struts and upper mounts... yet I can barely get my hand in between the fender lip and the tire.
So I was thinking next the upper spring cup is deteriorated. I noticed MB makes them in a variety of sizes from 8mm to 23mm.

12.75" from the center of the wheel star to the fender lip. Anyone have a quick second to take a known good stock measurement for me?

Thanks!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-26-2011, 03:15 PM
slk230red's Avatar
WECO Installer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 820
My '93 2.3 that I purchased new measures 14.5" from the center of the wheel star to the fender lip on both sides. Mine still has the original springs.
__________________

1993 190E 2.3
2001 SLK230
1971 LS5 (454) Corvette Convertible
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-27-2011, 11:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 30
Yep, I figured I was squatting kinda low.

It makes clunking sounds over rough pavement. >

Any ideas guys? What else is there that has to do with front ride hight?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2011, 12:06 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,332
Are you sure that the previous owner didn't put lowering springs in? Or cut the stock springs? It's more likely than you think. Other than that I don't know if broken/worn front control arms could affect ride height at all. Typically it's springs/shocks/spring pads that are the main determinant of ride height. But spring pads aren't going to make up for 2" difference, even if you left them completely out.

How is the ride height in the rear?
__________________
http://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z...-RESIZED-1.jpg
1991 300E - 212K and rising fast...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-28-2011, 03:19 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 254
I bought an 1989 190E 2.6 for my daughter. I always thought it was raked pretty low in the front but I haven't measured it. If I remember, I'll measure it on Wednesday when I see her. It only has 75K original miles on it and the struts and shocks seem to be stiff and in good shape. I highly doubt the lady that previously owned it had the springs replaced or had it lowered.
Now I'm even more curious about it!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-28-2011, 04:02 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,332
Another thing that sometimes happens is people will go wild replacing everything in the rear of the car and leave the front alone or vice versa. This will accentuate the "raked" look or "saggy ass" look, depending on which combination it is. Suspension should always be done equally for best results. But sometimes that is not always a financially viable option when stuff breaks unexpectedly.

As a side note I always thought 190E's had a lower stance compared to the 300E. Comparing stock cars I've seen.
__________________
http://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z...-RESIZED-1.jpg
1991 300E - 212K and rising fast...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-29-2011, 11:14 AM
slk230red's Avatar
WECO Installer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 820
Quote:
Originally Posted by denaliano View Post
Yep, I figured I was squatting kinda low.

It makes clunking sounds over rough pavement. >

Any ideas guys? What else is there that has to do with front ride hight?
How many coils do you count?
__________________

1993 190E 2.3
2001 SLK230
1971 LS5 (454) Corvette Convertible
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-29-2011, 05:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 30


lesjofors 40 568 03

Looked up the part on EPC, it discussed "points", and they appear to be the correct part number?! Counted the coils, and none appear to be cut. What is going on with this thing?

EPC Says - (PDF) www.c-hock.com/downloads/work/springpoints.pdf

I'm trying to get ahold of a spring compressor that'll work so I can yank it out to take a closer look.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-04-2011, 11:22 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 30
Ok, so counted the coils again, compared to my spare stock coil, and it's right on. 12-13 or so.

Rented the Compressor from vstech and should be here this week.

If I pull these coils, and they're identical to my stock spare... Then what?! Move up to a 2304 coil? That's the super heavy duty one for the diesels with every option available I think.

Is there ANYthing else that could affect ride hight this much?

Thanks again guys!
__________________
http://i54.tinypic.com/1z20won.jpg
- 1993 w201 2.3L Auto -
- 2002 GMC Sierra Denali AWD Quadrasteer -
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-04-2011, 09:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,332
I wonder when previous owner replaced the springs, if he left the spring pads out? You won't know until the spring is out. But that would definitely cause a change in ride height and clunks over bumps.
__________________
http://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z...-RESIZED-1.jpg
1991 300E - 212K and rising fast...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-04-2011, 11:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 30
Sure hope so, but it's still a good 2 inches too low!
__________________
http://i54.tinypic.com/1z20won.jpg
- 1993 w201 2.3L Auto -
- 2002 GMC Sierra Denali AWD Quadrasteer -
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-04-2011, 11:47 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,332
If he left the spring pad out completely and did not put anything in its place (some use garden hose for the "lowest" stance), I imagine that could easily make up for 1.75" worth of height difference (SLK's car is 14.5, yours is 12.75).
__________________
http://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z...-RESIZED-1.jpg
1991 300E - 212K and rising fast...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-05-2011, 12:19 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 30
Wouldn't that be great. But now I have no clue what size pads i'd need?
__________________
http://i54.tinypic.com/1z20won.jpg
- 1993 w201 2.3L Auto -
- 2002 GMC Sierra Denali AWD Quadrasteer -
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-05-2011, 12:24 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by denaliano View Post
Wouldn't that be great. But now I have no clue what size pads i'd need?
No biggie. 3 or 4 "bump" pads in front is stock. The difference between 3 and 4 is less than .25".
__________________
http://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z...-RESIZED-1.jpg
1991 300E - 212K and rising fast...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-05-2011, 12:28 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 30
Guess we'll see in a few days when the compressor arrives! Might as well order the pads now anyway. I think they're cheap.

__________________
http://i54.tinypic.com/1z20won.jpg
- 1993 w201 2.3L Auto -
- 2002 GMC Sierra Denali AWD Quadrasteer -
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page