Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-15-2004, 11:39 AM
spinedoc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: North Grafton, MA USA
Posts: 700
Need advice, 4matic or Audi Quattro?

Looking for a winter vehicle, New England snow. I absolutely HATE SUV's so my only choice is an AWD car. I have narrowed it down to either Audi Quattro A8 or Mercedes E430 4matic (E500 if they exist in 4matic).

Hopefully I can get some opinions here, preferably without flaming. I really have heard some nightmare stories about Audi as a company in general and I am really steering towards the E class. Although the E class does not have the best reputation either, I think it would still be better than the Audi. I will probably buy a 1998 - 2000 depending on price.

So how is the E class 4matic in the snow? Can anyone provide a comparision between the AWD of the 4matic versus the Quattro? Is the 4matic all time AWD, or is it more of a 4 wheel traction control?

Thanks much guys!

__________________
2007 Corvette Convertible Torch Red
1996 MBz SL500
2008 Harley Davidson Night Rod Special
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-15-2004, 02:15 PM
dtf dtf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South East CT
Posts: 874
Here is the extent of my knowledge: The 4Matic is electronically controlled 35/65 front/rear split and uses traction control to direct wheel torque to the wheel that grips. The Quattro uses a torque sensing differential to tranfer the power and also has limited slip differentials at the wheels (I think). The Audi and MB need only one tire to grip to get traction and pull you out of trouble.
__________________
dtf
1994 E320 Wagon (Died @ 308,669 miles)
1995 E300 Diesel (228,000)
1999 E300 Turbodiesel ( died @ 255,000)
2006 Toyota Tundra SR5 AC 4X4 (115,000 miles) rusted frame - sold to chop shop
2011 Audi A4 Avant (165,000 miles) Seized engine - donated to Salvation Army
BMW 330 xi 6 speed manual (175,034 miles)
2014 E350 4Matic Wagon 128,000 miles
2018 Dodge Ram 21,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-15-2004, 02:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 329
Haven't driven a 4matic, but the Quattro system is definitely a great AWD system, at least on the 2003 I've driven. Very seamless operation, very sure-footed. On the flip side, I don't know that I'd trust Audis built during the years you're looking at.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-15-2004, 05:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 133
Spinedoc,

No E500 4Matic in those years. The E430 4Matic is a bit rare. Either way, don't forget to put on four Nokian winter tires (or your favorite winter tire)!

Regards,
Bob
__________________
'94 E500 Anthracite
'92 300E 4Matic (donated to charity)
'90 300TE 4Matic
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-15-2004, 05:30 PM
radunegru's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 334
I am a mercedes fan but as far as Audi AWD is probably no comparison. Mercedes introduce the 4matic version to compete with Audi. In Germany the 4matic mercedes is practicaly unknown.I also test drive the audi alroad quttro and 4matic Eclass estate (wagon) ...audi perform better from my opinion.
__________________
New Addition to the family
2013 Passat TDI 5Miles
2004 E500 4MATIC Wagon 95k
1996 E300 Diesel 173k Sold
1993 300E 2.8 230k Sold
1994 E320 White Wagon 373K Sold
Still dreaming about ....500E


Radu Negru
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-15-2004, 06:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: east coast
Posts: 1,255
I don't know what New England snow is like, how often how deep how much ice.

Do some research on AWD systems they are a bit different from four-wheel-drive units

You have picked two very nice sophisticated high-end cars, If you were to ask me when the AWD sytems would blow away their two wheel drive versions all other things being equal I would set in damp wet conditions. On ice and snow things start to equal out with their two wheel drive versions.

Now put some high grip snow or rain Nokians on a Mitsubishi Evo or Subaru WRXi and empty the snowy roads these cars would be capable of amazing feats.

Just my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-16-2004, 06:42 PM
spinedoc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: North Grafton, MA USA
Posts: 700
Thanx for the replies guys, I'm appreciative of the honesty. I have done some research into AWD versus 4wd, and the differences between all the AWD models. From what I gather the Audi system is one of the best engineered, but the only caveat is that it has a 50/50 split, which means less of a rear wheel drive car feel. The MB is 35/65. One advantage is that the slight understeer characteristic of the A8's is corrected with the 50/50 split.

I will probably go with a A8 for my New England Winters, and of course my SL for the spring and summer!
__________________
2007 Corvette Convertible Torch Red
1996 MBz SL500
2008 Harley Davidson Night Rod Special
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-16-2004, 07:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 758
At the risk of being burned at the stake as a heretic, you may want to add the Subaru Lagacy Outback wagon to your shop-and-compare list. Great cars, simple and economical to run, good value at $23K new. They're not stylish, but great little workhorses. Use the Nokian winter tires (with studs) and you can almost climb the side of a building.

Just a thought, and yes I own one, along with two Mercedes.

230/8
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-17-2004, 02:17 PM
3star's Avatar
Go Leafs Go!
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 87
I have never driven the Audi Q so I can't comment on it, but I am extremely satisfied with my '99 E320 4 matic on snow. I don't even put snow tires on it...just use my Michelin Energy MXV4 all-seasons and reduce speed a little does the trick .
__________________
2012 ML350 Bluetec 4-matic
1999 E320 4-matic Estate


"A ship in harbour is safe, but thats not what ships are built for". - John A. Shedd

http://www.varaderocigar.com/images/...ontecristo.gif
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-17-2004, 06:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 520
When the A8 first arrived I heard that because of the aluminum body there was a very small number of shops (2 , 1 on each coast) that could repair damaged body panels. I suggest that you check with your insurance company for experience with this car. If very few shops can do the work, you might find that insurance is dear, and the time to repair is long. Also ask the Audi dealer for names of local body shops.

regards,

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-17-2004, 07:12 PM
'90 300TE 4-Matic
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
Posts: 7
No comments from me re the Audi Quattro as I know very little about that system but have a fair knowledge about 4-Matic after more than 2 years ownership.
The MB 4-Matic is actually not an AWD system. It works in 4 stages that come in very fast (<0.7 sec) when the sensors pick up a slip. There is more to it than this but basically the 4-Matic is a normal 2wd rear wheel drive. That is called "Stage 0". After slip it changes to "Stage 1" ie 35F/65R. More slip it goes to 50/50 (Stage 2). If that is not enough it goes to 50/50 + diff lock on the rear axle(Stage 3). When there is no more slip it goes back to stage 0 again. It made a fantastic difference on ice and snow but sometimes causes repair bills.....
I had it in Sweden during one pretty good winter and when the system works it is like driving on rails compared with 2wd that throws the rear end all over the place during accelleration.
__________________
'90 300TE 4-Matic

Last edited by NiuginiBenz; 09-17-2004 at 07:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-17-2004, 08:10 PM
dtf dtf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South East CT
Posts: 874
If you are talking about the '90 version, that is the first generation 4Matic. I think MB stopped using it in '92 or '93(?). It was re-introduced as the current electronic version in '98. From '94 to '96 they used the lousy ASR system. Awful in the snow even with Hakkapeliitta 2s loaded up. I'm not sure what happened with the 5 speed transmission in '97 though. I always wondered how the first generation 4Matic worked. Sounds cool actually.
__________________
dtf
1994 E320 Wagon (Died @ 308,669 miles)
1995 E300 Diesel (228,000)
1999 E300 Turbodiesel ( died @ 255,000)
2006 Toyota Tundra SR5 AC 4X4 (115,000 miles) rusted frame - sold to chop shop
2011 Audi A4 Avant (165,000 miles) Seized engine - donated to Salvation Army
BMW 330 xi 6 speed manual (175,034 miles)
2014 E350 4Matic Wagon 128,000 miles
2018 Dodge Ram 21,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-17-2004, 08:13 PM
dtf dtf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South East CT
Posts: 874
Why not go for the S8?
__________________
dtf
1994 E320 Wagon (Died @ 308,669 miles)
1995 E300 Diesel (228,000)
1999 E300 Turbodiesel ( died @ 255,000)
2006 Toyota Tundra SR5 AC 4X4 (115,000 miles) rusted frame - sold to chop shop
2011 Audi A4 Avant (165,000 miles) Seized engine - donated to Salvation Army
BMW 330 xi 6 speed manual (175,034 miles)
2014 E350 4Matic Wagon 128,000 miles
2018 Dodge Ram 21,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-18-2004, 12:41 PM
732002's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 486
Subaru

I would also look at Subaru's. They sell for less
and don't break down as often. Try Legacy GT
or WRX?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-18-2004, 06:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 320
Audi Quattro uses differential locks and the Mercedes 4matic system applies brakes to the spinning wheels. ML has a similar system.

Going uphill in an ML, if you apply brakes, the vehicle may start to slide down as breaking takes precedence over traction control.

Brakes may wear quicker in the 4matic if the system is used frequently.

Audi system is more efficient but expensive.

Mercedes system is cheaper but less efficient and relies heavily on electronics.

__________________
Zafar
94 E320 58000 Miles
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page