Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Vintage Mercedes Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 02-16-2005, 02:28 PM
RR3 RR3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 50
The injector pump was already adjusted by the mechanic at MB who only works on 6.3. He is 60 plus and ready for retirement, I think he's done all the right things with the car.

As for the whitewall, I assume there are no V rated whitewalls? Actually I thin I will go change the 14 inch wheels to 15 inch wheels, would this give me any better options for white walled v rated tires?

Thanks,

R

Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 02-17-2005, 02:16 PM
natman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Any pics of the new beast?

RR3,

Sucha great post certainly desrves some fulfillment?!

Nathan
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 02-18-2005, 11:53 AM
RR3 RR3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 50
The diagrams of the grease fittings, dont show grease nipples at the rear wheels?
But I do remember seeing some there.
Gerry, where exactly are the rear brake holds located, in each wheel bearing?

I will make some digital pics next week.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 02-18-2005, 01:59 PM
gerryvz's Avatar
"Unhinged Troll" - Jim B.
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by RR3
The diagrams of the grease fittings, dont show grease nipples at the rear wheels?
But I do remember seeing some there.
Gerry, where exactly are the rear brake holds located, in each wheel bearing?

I will make some digital pics next week.
No, the brake hold bearings are located on the axle, and I believe the grease nipples are in the vicinity as well (axle shafts).

Cheers,
Gerry
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 04-19-2005, 05:46 AM
wbain5280's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Northern Va.
Posts: 3,386
Oh Oh, here's another one buying a rolling parts car.

http://forums.mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=85710
__________________
Regards

Warren

Currently 1965 220Sb, 2002 FORD Crown Vic Police Interceptor

Had 1965 220SEb, 1967 230S, 280SE 4.5, 300SE (W126), 420SEL

ENTER > = (HP RPN)

Not part of the in-crowd since 1952.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 04-19-2005, 11:27 AM
gerryvz's Avatar
"Unhinged Troll" - Jim B.
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,268
I have seen dozens of these types over the years. It got so that it is predictable, hence the creation of the PDF document I did in January.

I wish this latest character good luck. Always hate to see people spending their 401ks, taking out home equity lines, robbing their kids' education trusts, etc. to fix up a $5,000 eBay M-100 car, when they just could have spent the proper money up front and had a car with far fewer needs.

As I've said, if my PPT saves one marriage or preserves the capital for one child's higher education, then it will have done its job.

Cheers,
Gerry
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 04-19-2005, 04:46 PM
BlackE55
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I read through Gerry's ppt *after* just barely losing an eBay auction on a 6.3.

In all seriousness, it probably did save my marriage. Looked at some 500Es, but ultimately decided on an M3. Well, umm, die hard Mercedes enthusiasts may think it was a worse choice than a money pit on Bundts. Oh well, me likey.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 04-19-2005, 05:25 PM
gerryvz's Avatar
"Unhinged Troll" - Jim B.
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,268
Difficult to go wrong with an M3, but a 500E is in my opinion a better car. Especially with NOS installed

Sometimes it just comes down to whether you want a coupe of a sedan. That decision makes the choice easier.

Glad you didn't get an eBay 6.3. 98% of the time, they are a disaster waiting to happen. I mean, say you buy a rusty car that was billed as rust-free, or purchase a car in dire need of mechanical work that was billed in the auction as a $5,000 creampuff?

Who is going to stick up for you? Is eBay going to do anything about it? They're laughing all the way to the bank, having made their money on sellers' fees. Are you going to spend $5-10K on a lawyer over a $5K car? By the time that debacle is over, you could have just spent the $15K on a nice 6.3 and be enjoying it out on the country roads whilst boasting a *****-eating cheek-to-cheek grin every time you hit the accelerator.

6.3 vs. 500E though. No contest. 500E wins hands down. Every single measure of performance, reliability, quality, engineering, longevity and parts availability and cost SCREAMS 500E.

Cheers,
Gerry
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 04-19-2005, 06:15 PM
BlackE55
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I love the 500E and very much different than the M3. The later being more of a track car than a drag monster. I looked at the C36 and C43, but there again are the issues of 4 doors and an automatic.

Since I own a 560 SEL, I figured a light, low-frills, manual coupe was the way to go this time around.

Getting psyched for the GingerMan track in MI later this June! Wish I could track it more, but I don't have that many weekends available.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 04-19-2005, 08:55 PM
Tomguy's Avatar
Vintage Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: near Scranton, PA
Posts: 5,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerryvz
6.3 vs. 500E though. No contest. 500E wins hands down. Every single measure of performance, reliability, quality, engineering, longevity and parts availability and cost SCREAMS 500E.
We'll see how true that is when the 500E becomes a 35 year-old model!
__________________
Current:
2021 Charger Scat Pack Widebody "Sinabee"
2018 Durango R/T

Previous:
1972 280SE 4.5
2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited "Hefe", 1992 Jeep Cherokee Laredo "Jeepy", 2006 Charger R/T "Hemi"
1999 Chrysler 300M - RIP @ 221k
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 04-19-2005, 09:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 100
But Gerry, they don't look like a classic 6.3. That's where I am, I agree that any stock E500 can kill any stock 6.3 in any event. But which one has a classic look now? I concede all other points but looks.
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 04-20-2005, 12:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 439
Yea, the 108 and 109 are just beautiful cars and will be just that, a classic for all time. I do not not care if the 109 is a 6.3, a 3.5 or a 4.5 it is made with the same craftmanship the wonderful lines the fine quality of fit and polish. Any 109 that is well maintained can stand with the best of cars short of the hand crafted auto of the 30's. They have a place in History. Short of a severe accident mine will be around for another 30 years.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 04-20-2005, 02:57 AM
gerryvz's Avatar
"Unhinged Troll" - Jim B.
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by tosbt
Yea, the 108 and 109 are just beautiful cars and will be just that, a classic for all time. I do not not care if the 109 is a 6.3, a 3.5 or a 4.5 it is made with the same craftmanship the wonderful lines the fine quality of fit and polish. Any 109 that is well maintained can stand with the best of cars short of the hand crafted auto of the 30's. They have a place in History. Short of a severe accident mine will be around for another 30 years.
I once too had a boner over these cars. Then I sobered up. Boner-B-Gone. The blood that was once in my nether parts, rushed back to my head. I can think much more clearly now with the additional blood going from my aorta into my brain, instead of downward...

Cheers,
Gerry
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 04-20-2005, 03:01 AM
gerryvz's Avatar
"Unhinged Troll" - Jim B.
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomguy
We'll see how true that is when the 500E becomes a 35 year-old model!

Well, that's 25 years from now. Plenty of time for *****-eating grins and giggles, far more than any 109 would provide !!

Not worried about parts availability. Are you suggesting that a 500E is less durable than a 6.3? 6.3s seem to have a bad habit of developing rust, while 124 cars decidedly generally do not.

I can currently purchase 1.3 complete factory manufactured 500E engines for the price of one measly 6.3 cylinder head new. So I guess for the price of two 6.3 cylinder heads, I could have 2.6 500E motors. Sounds like a great deal to me.

Cheers,
Gerry
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 04-20-2005, 10:11 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 439
Cool

When my hobbie becomes an obsession then it time to move on. The bridge between the two can only be termoil. I also collect shotguns, not long ago a salesman said " you should put this one in a box and never shoot her" my response was "if she was a pertty woman I sure as hell would kiss her". She's going to cost me time and money but I'm going to play with her and if she becomes to difficult or time consuming then move on..............and don't look back.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page