Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-26-2006, 09:08 AM
MattBelliveau's Avatar
Gotta another one...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,685
Clarification requested : 617 motor - DI?

Could someone let me know if I'm correct in saying that the 617 motor uses Direct Injection? If not, which type? Thanks.

__________________
1989 300E 144K
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-26-2006, 09:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
It's indirectly injected, into prechambers.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-26-2006, 11:18 AM
Tabor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Also, a lot of us prefer the injection into pre-chambers. Mercedes did it to keep noise down. It has the added affects of preventing a nailing injector from burning a hole in a piston. Also, I think it reduces polymerization under some whacky WVO situations.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-26-2006, 11:37 AM
Willing Participant
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,404
Yes, it's great, it's rugged, all that. Direct injection is slightly more efficient, though.
__________________
1982 300CD Petrol/Black Leather
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-26-2006, 12:08 PM
MattBelliveau's Avatar
Gotta another one...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,685
I was asking so that the answer might aid the research I've been doing on the effects of WVO on these engines. I'm asumming that DI sprays the pattern directly into the CC, correct? While IDI sprays the pattern into the prechamber, which relays it into the CC. If this is true, it would explain the claim of DI being more efficient, for there is one less variable involved. Thank you, guys.
__________________
1989 300E 144K
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-26-2006, 12:18 PM
MattBelliveau's Avatar
Gotta another one...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,685
...and in that case, what does TDI stand for?
__________________
1989 300E 144K
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-26-2006, 12:20 PM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 27,018
yeah, and also, DI has a better power curve.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattBelliveau
I was asking so that the answer might aid the research I've been doing on the effects of WVO on these engines. I'm asumming that DI sprays the pattern directly into the CC, correct? While IDI sprays the pattern into the prechamber, which relays it into the CC. If this is true, it would explain the claim of DI being more efficient, for there is one less variable involved. Thank you, guys.
due mostly to the fact that the combustion can expand directly onto the piston. with PC combustion must flow through the PC tube or whatever orifice it uses to pass into the CC.
I do like the piston burn protection and ... "quiet" combustion? anyway.
John
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-26-2006, 12:26 PM
MattBelliveau's Avatar
Gotta another one...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,685
piston burn protection...since the fuel is not sitting in the CC, right?
__________________
1989 300E 144K
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-26-2006, 12:28 PM
TheDon's Avatar
Ghost of Diesels Past
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattBelliveau
...and in that case, what does TDI stand for?
Turbo Direct Injection i belive..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-26-2006, 12:35 PM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 27,018
Well...

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattBelliveau
piston burn protection...since the fuel is not sitting in the CC, right?
More like since fuel is getting spread around by the PC ball. before getting to the CC. a nailing DI fuel squirt can put a lot of HOT fuel in one spot on the piston and cause meltdown...
John
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-26-2006, 12:37 PM
MattBelliveau's Avatar
Gotta another one...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,685
Ahhh. TheDon, I checked out BHD's site this week. Pretty cool. ow long has that been up?
__________________
1989 300E 144K
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-26-2006, 12:43 PM
MattBelliveau's Avatar
Gotta another one...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,685
Quote:
Turbo Direct Injection i belive..
Does that refer to the fact that the engine is a turbo? If so, would my 300d be a TIDI?
__________________
1989 300E 144K
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-26-2006, 12:46 PM
TheDon's Avatar
Ghost of Diesels Past
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattBelliveau
Does that refer to the fact that the engine is a turbo? If so, would my 300d be a TIDI?
according to wikipedia TDI is Turbo Direct Injection.. i guess i was right.. and TIDI i guess
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-26-2006, 10:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by vstech
More like since fuel is getting spread around by the PC ball. before getting to the CC. a nailing DI fuel squirt can put a lot of HOT fuel in one spot on the piston and cause meltdown...
John
I actually had this happen on a C7 Cat once. Had it not been under warranty, things would have gotten real expensive real fast.

__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page