Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-26-2006, 09:08 AM
MattBelliveau's Avatar
Gotta another one...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,685
Clarification requested : 617 motor - DI?

Could someone let me know if I'm correct in saying that the 617 motor uses Direct Injection? If not, which type? Thanks.
__________________
1989 300E 144K
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-26-2006, 09:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
It's indirectly injected, into prechambers.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-26-2006, 11:18 AM
Tabor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Also, a lot of us prefer the injection into pre-chambers. Mercedes did it to keep noise down. It has the added affects of preventing a nailing injector from burning a hole in a piston. Also, I think it reduces polymerization under some whacky WVO situations.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-26-2006, 11:37 AM
Willing Participant
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,404
Yes, it's great, it's rugged, all that. Direct injection is slightly more efficient, though.
__________________
1982 300CD Petrol/Black Leather
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-26-2006, 12:08 PM
MattBelliveau's Avatar
Gotta another one...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,685
I was asking so that the answer might aid the research I've been doing on the effects of WVO on these engines. I'm asumming that DI sprays the pattern directly into the CC, correct? While IDI sprays the pattern into the prechamber, which relays it into the CC. If this is true, it would explain the claim of DI being more efficient, for there is one less variable involved. Thank you, guys.
__________________
1989 300E 144K
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-26-2006, 12:18 PM
MattBelliveau's Avatar
Gotta another one...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,685
...and in that case, what does TDI stand for?
__________________
1989 300E 144K
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-26-2006, 12:20 PM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 27,015
yeah, and also, DI has a better power curve.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattBelliveau
I was asking so that the answer might aid the research I've been doing on the effects of WVO on these engines. I'm asumming that DI sprays the pattern directly into the CC, correct? While IDI sprays the pattern into the prechamber, which relays it into the CC. If this is true, it would explain the claim of DI being more efficient, for there is one less variable involved. Thank you, guys.
due mostly to the fact that the combustion can expand directly onto the piston. with PC combustion must flow through the PC tube or whatever orifice it uses to pass into the CC.
I do like the piston burn protection and ... "quiet" combustion? anyway.
John
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page