Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-14-2013, 10:42 PM
Mölyapina's Avatar
User title not in use
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Chelmsford, Massachusetts
Posts: 4,373
Is a W123 300D automatic directly compatible with a W126 300SD?

I'm thinking that the answer is no (electric speedometer in the W126 vs. the mechanical one in the W123), but could I swap over the speedometer parts from the 300SD transmission into the 300D transmission and use it in the 300SD?

Oh, and what about the cruise control? Could I just leave that disconnected for a while?

__________________
"Senior Luna, your sense of humor is still loco... but we love it, anyway." -rickymay ____ "Your sense of humor is still loco... " -MBeige ____ "Señor Luna, your sense of humor is quite järjetön" -Delibes

1982 300SD -- 211k, Texas car, tranny issues ____ 1979 240D 4-speed 234k -- turbo and tuned IP, third world taxi hot rod

2 Samuel 12:13: "David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord.” And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-14-2013, 11:00 PM
TheDon's Avatar
Ghost of Diesels Past
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,285
Is a W123 300D automatic directly compatible with a W126 300SD?

Swap tail shafts
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-14-2013, 11:06 PM
Mölyapina's Avatar
User title not in use
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Chelmsford, Massachusetts
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDon View Post
Swap tail shafts
Does that deal with the cruise control issue as well?
__________________
"Senior Luna, your sense of humor is still loco... but we love it, anyway." -rickymay ____ "Your sense of humor is still loco... " -MBeige ____ "Señor Luna, your sense of humor is quite järjetön" -Delibes

1982 300SD -- 211k, Texas car, tranny issues ____ 1979 240D 4-speed 234k -- turbo and tuned IP, third world taxi hot rod

2 Samuel 12:13: "David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord.” And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-14-2013, 11:17 PM
eatont9999's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,953
There is enough difference that I don't find myself using any parts from a W123 except for OM617 related parts on my 300SD. The cruise control seems to be the same. The computer is different, though. Same actuator and same switch. The wiring seems to be the same, too. Perhaps there is a sensor on the W123 as well as the mechanical speedo. If the differential ratio is different, the computer will be different. I believe the computers are calibrated for a certain gear ratio and sensor input. I have yet to meet an actuator unit that did not work with a W126 as well as a W123.
__________________
1991 F250 super-cab 7.3 IDI. (rebuilt by me) Banks Sidewinder turbo, hydroboost brakes, new IP and injectors.
2003 S430 - 107K
1983 300SD - Tanoshii - mostly restored ~400K+.
1983 300SD - Good interior. Engine finally tamed ~250K.
Monark Nozzle Install Video - http://tinyurl.com/ptd2tge
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-16-2013, 01:13 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Idaho
Posts: 384
My 300d has a sd tran in it and could see a way to swap the reader
__________________
84 300sd 2.47 dif 360k
26 mpg needs lots of love
given to me in pitty

89 civic hatchback auto 140k
33mpgs soon to be low to mid 40's
been in the family since mile 1

85 300d with unknown knock. driven over 30k with knock and still going. sold for $800
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-16-2013, 09:51 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
I think I'm correct in saying that the "swap the tail ends" myth has been busted by the likes of mach4, rollguy and deliveryvalve.

Have a look for mach4's diesel SL (107) conversion thread - I think there's evidence somewhere in that mega thread.
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-16-2013, 12:02 PM
Zacharias's Avatar
Not so amused
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: West Quebec
Posts: 4,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
I think I'm correct in saying that the "swap the tail ends" myth has been busted by the likes of mach4, rollguy and deliveryvalve.
x2.

I was about to get a trans from another member to go 126 -> 123 and decided to run it by my local indy Mercedes shop first.

The owner showed me the exploded parts diagrams for both. No way in hades I can see it working, from difference in the shape/footprint of the tail shaft housings alone. I was looking at the swap for a 1980 300td.
__________________


Mac
2002 e320 4matic estate│1985 300d│1980 300td
Previous: 1979 & 1982 & 1983 300sd │ 1982 240d

“Let's take a drive into the middle of nowhere with a packet of Marlboro lights and talk about our lives.” ― Joseph Heller, Catch-22
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-16-2013, 10:33 PM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 27,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
I think I'm correct in saying that the "swap the tail ends" myth has been busted by the likes of mach4, rollguy and deliveryvalve.

Have a look for mach4's diesel SL (107) conversion thread - I think there's evidence somewhere in that mega thread.
nope, not TOTALLY busted... a 123turbo auto trans will work in a 126 if the tail shaft and sender ring is swapped. however, it will NOT work the other way around.

this is assuming both trans are the 722.3xx the 2xx and 4xx will not fit parts to the 3xx or each other.

the 123 mechanical sender fits on the 126 output shaft, but there is no provisions for oiling the parts... so only the electronic sender can be swapped...



Quote:
Originally Posted by Zacharias View Post
x2.

I was about to get a trans from another member to go 126 -> 123 and decided to run it by my local indy Mercedes shop first.

The owner showed me the exploded parts diagrams for both. No way in hades I can see it working, from difference in the shape/footprint of the tail shaft housings alone. I was looking at the swap for a 1980 300td.
your 1980 722.2xx trans is totally different from the .3xx in the 126's...
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 560SL convertible
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
2005 Dodge Sprinter 2500 158"WB
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-17-2013, 03:04 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by vstech View Post
nope, not TOTALLY busted... a 123turbo auto trans will work in a 126 if the tail shaft and sender ring is swapped. however, it will NOT work the other way around.

this is assuming both trans are the 722.3xx the 2xx and 4xx will not fit parts to the 3xx or each other.

the 123 mechanical sender fits on the 126 output shaft, but there is no provisions for oiling the parts... so only the electronic sender can be swapped...
So in the context of this thread you are saying yes then?

You could use a 722.315 - remove the tail cone and the mechanical speedometer part and put the tail cone part from the 722.303 in its place.
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-17-2013, 10:23 AM
mach4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego County, CA
Posts: 2,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
So in the context of this thread you are saying yes then?

You could use a 722.315 - remove the tail cone and the mechanical speedometer part and put the tail cone part from the 722.303 in its place.
That's exactly what I've done on my 617->107 swap, although I used the tail cone from the 722.3 out of the 380SL. I also swapped the yoke in order to keep the SL's larger flex disks and driveshaft. It works perfectly.
__________________
Current Stable
  • 380SL (diesel)
  • Corvette C5
  • Manx
  • Baja Bug
  • F350 Powerstroke
  • Auburn Boattail Speedster replica
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-18-2013, 04:16 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by mach4 View Post
That's exactly what I've done on my 617->107 swap, although I used the tail cone from the 722.3 out of the 380SL. I also swapped the yoke in order to keep the SL's larger flex disks and driveshaft. It works perfectly.
Well it looks like I'll have to read through that thread again!

Confused - that's me...
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-18-2013, 10:29 AM
mach4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego County, CA
Posts: 2,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
Well it looks like I'll have to read through that thread again!

Confused - that's me...
I went back and checked the various threads and i don't think I ever detailed that part. When I replaced the 722.4 with a 722.3 I took the tail cone from the SL's 722.3 and swapped it to the 722.3 of the 300D. This is what gave me the electric speedo and the option to keep the larger yoke.

I considered this fixing a problem not part of the swap. Guess I should have documented it in the thread.
__________________
Current Stable
  • 380SL (diesel)
  • Corvette C5
  • Manx
  • Baja Bug
  • F350 Powerstroke
  • Auburn Boattail Speedster replica
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-18-2013, 12:44 PM
Zacharias's Avatar
Not so amused
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: West Quebec
Posts: 4,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by vstech View Post
your 1980 722.2xx trans is totally different from the .3xx in the 126's...
Do you mean the Bowden setup or something else? I was doing a complete linkage swap to use the Bowden setup on the earlier car.

Actually my '80 has a vacuum-control-only trans -- .117>? if I recall correctly.

When I saw the parts diagrams it was apparent how completely different the shape of the housing is in the tailshaft area. I could see a difference by looking at the pic of the trans I was supposed to get, but for some reason I still thought the other tailshaft housing would bolt up....
__________________


Mac
2002 e320 4matic estate│1985 300d│1980 300td
Previous: 1979 & 1982 & 1983 300sd │ 1982 240d

“Let's take a drive into the middle of nowhere with a packet of Marlboro lights and talk about our lives.” ― Joseph Heller, Catch-22
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-18-2013, 02:53 PM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by mach4 View Post
I went back and checked the various threads and i don't think I ever detailed that part. When I replaced the 722.4 with a 722.3 I took the tail cone from the SL's 722.3 and swapped it to the 722.3 of the 300D. This is what gave me the electric speedo and the option to keep the larger yoke.

I considered this fixing a problem not part of the swap. Guess I should have documented it in the thread.
Hey that's fine - at least I'm not loosing my marbles faster than I thought I was!

__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page