Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 05-04-2019, 10:02 PM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,285
This is the company that has the paper towel type elements.

Gulf Coast Filters, Inc. Specializing in Bypass Oil filters, Fuel filters, Hydraulic filters and Custom filtering

Not that Gulf Coast and Frantz (which is still being made) sell elements for their filters. That would be a way to go if you are worried about common toilet paper.

__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 05-05-2019, 06:40 AM
spock505's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Blighty
Posts: 1,388
I suspect we are jumping to the wrong conclusions as to the nature and or purpose of the material in question, mechanics would have reported clogged pick-up meshes long ago with resulting engines starved of oil.

Having used these filters for years, I have never seen the above or any hint of debris either in pick-up or pan itself.
__________________
David


1996 Mercedes S124 E300TD - 129k - rolling restoration project -

1998 Mercedes W210 300TD - 118k (assimilated into above vehicle)
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 05-05-2019, 07:58 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by spock505 View Post
I suspect we are jumping to the wrong conclusions as to the nature and or purpose of the material in question, mechanics would have reported clogged pick-up meshes long ago with resulting engines starved of oil.

Having used these filters for years, I have never seen the above or any hint of debris either in pick-up or pan itself.
You beg the question of whether this design works at all.

If the bypass section was working efficiently, you would expect it to look like the photo in post 41 of this thread. You would also expect the oil to be cleaner, and not look like liquid darkness. But neither seems to be the case. The surprising thing about the photos in post 1 isn't the twigs and chaff, it's that the bypass element is so clean. It's gray and fluffy, not black and oily. By contrast, the full flow section is packed with nasty soot.

I'm of the opinion that the bypass section is poorly designed and ends up being ineffective. It may be because insufficient flow is routed through this section, or it may be that the protective "landscape" paper clogs and blocks flow. The reason sicks and bugs "work" in the bypass section is that the bypass section doesn't work. Only the little full flow section at the bottom is doing anything of value.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 05-06-2019, 01:57 AM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by spock505 View Post
I suspect we are jumping to the wrong conclusions as to the nature and or purpose of the material in question, mechanics would have reported clogged pick-up meshes long ago with resulting engines starved of oil.

Having used these filters for years, I have never seen the above or any hint of debris either in pick-up or pan itself.
First off, there was no real question upfront. As I stated before, we have known for a long time that many of the filters are packed with this sort of media. There is no international incident here just because I opened up a new one and posted the pics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mxfrank View Post
You beg the question of whether this design works at all.

If the bypass section was working efficiently, you would expect it to look like the photo in post 41 of this thread. You would also expect the oil to be cleaner, and not look like liquid darkness. But neither seems to be the case. The surprising thing about the photos in post 1 isn't the twigs and chaff, it's that the bypass element is so clean. It's gray and fluffy, not black and oily. By contrast, the full flow section is packed with nasty soot.

I'm of the opinion that the bypass section is poorly designed and ends up being ineffective. It may be because insufficient flow is routed through this section, or it may be that the protective "landscape" paper clogs and blocks flow. The reason sicks and bugs "work" in the bypass section is that the bypass section doesn't work. Only the little full flow section at the bottom is doing anything of value.
I agree; nobody knows if it truly works at all. I suppose someone with good metal working skills could be brave, cut open one of these, remove media, and then do an oil analysis one cycle with the media, one without...

The reality is that these old IDI engines load a lot of soot in the oil, and so perhaps this may help... May not as well.

But the other reality is that it takes a very miniscule fraction of soot to make the oil black as can be. Put new oil in, start the car and idle it for a minute, then check the dipstick - its pretty black then, with no appreciable soot loaded.

That said, your final paragraph somewhat misses the mark, IMO. It may be ineffective, but that's not the role or function of the "landscape" fabric outer separator (which should be designed for maximum flow as the depth of the packing should be doing the filtering). Sticks and bugs neither do or dont work. They are just there. The only effect is an absolutely tiny reduction in the number of dense-packed fibers, and equally minimal volume in that part of the element that has the dense packed fibers.

BTW the Baldwin P102 is dual pleated media IIRC.
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (113k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
1993 300SD (291k)
1993 300D 2.5T (338k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (265k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K)
1985 300D (233K)

Last edited by JHZR2; 05-06-2019 at 02:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 05-06-2019, 10:22 AM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,285
We need to get someone that has added a commercially made bypass oil filter to their system to comment on the Oil Color.

With the Frantz or my homemade filter housing with the string wound filter the Oil still turned black as it did with the stock oil filter.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 05-06-2019, 11:40 AM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel911 View Post
We need to get someone that has added a commercially made bypass oil filter to their system to comment on the Oil Color.

With the Frantz or my homemade filter housing with the string wound filter the Oil still turned black as it did with the stock oil filter.
Agree. Someone somewhere has experience.

Spot is like carbon black. It takes very little to affect color, so not sure color is a good determinant. The carbon is likely tiny, tiny particles. The oil add pack also is designed to keep those tiny particles dispersed vs aggregated.

I suspect that soot loading percentages would be a better metric. But data all the same is essential.
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (113k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
1993 300SD (291k)
1993 300D 2.5T (338k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (265k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K)
1985 300D (233K)
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 05-06-2019, 01:51 PM
Mad Scientist
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,600
If someone daily drives one of these engines consistently and services their oil at a regular interval is willing to do a UOA and compare results with one of the cotton field mowing filters and either Baldwin P102 or Hastings LF380, I'd chip in for it.

I don't drive my truck regularly enough to make my engine a good candidate. Also, with the cost of a UOA being 80% the cost of an oil and filter change, I just..........change my oil.
__________________
617 swapped Toyota Pickup, 22-24 MPG, 50k miles on swap
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 05-06-2019, 04:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,540
Much to do about nothing. I don't care what is stuffed in there as long as it does the job. My concern is the filtering spec and the replacement interval. The spec is beyond my control but I can look it up. The interval is my responsibility.
__________________
Not MBZ nor A/C trained professional but a die-hard DIY and green engineer. Use the info at your own peril. Picked up 2 Infractions because of disagreements. NOW reversed.

W124 Keyless remote, PM for details. http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/mercedes-used-parts-sale-wanted/334620-fs-w124-chasis-keyless-remote-%2450-shipped.html

1 X 2006 CDI
1 x 87 300SDL
1 x 87 300D
1 x 87 300TDT wagon
1 x 83 300D
1 x 84 190D ( 5 sp ) - All R134 converted + keyless entry.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 05-06-2019, 07:22 PM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by ah-kay View Post
Much to do about nothing. I don't care what is stuffed in there as long as it does the job. My concern is the filtering spec and the replacement interval. The spec is beyond my control but I can look it up. The interval is my responsibility.
Agree; this was intended to be very much "for fun" just because I wanted to see the stuff myself..

IIRC its either 17 or 32 micron, per the wix website; one of those values is for the 617 the other for the 603, I think...

Wix website at least has a number. Where else would you look it up?
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (113k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
1993 300SD (291k)
1993 300D 2.5T (338k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (265k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K)
1985 300D (233K)
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 05-07-2019, 11:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oberlin, OH
Posts: 641
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHZR2 View Post
Agree; this was intended to be very much "for fun" just because I wanted to see the stuff myself..

IIRC its either 17 or 32 micron, per the wix website; one of those values is for the 617 the other for the 603, I think...

Wix website at least has a number. Where else would you look it up?
Agree, it is interesting. I'm going to stick with MB OEM filters or MANN and change oil within the recommended OCI. The MB filters should be manufactured to meet the spec. required.
__________________
-- Chris

'95 E300, 216k miles, Silver Surfer
'05 E320 CDI, 138k miles
'07 S550 4matic, 69k miles

Gone but not forgotten:

'76 300D, 350k miles?, SOLD in 1995
'75 240D, 300k miles, SOLD in 1991
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 05-07-2019, 12:19 PM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHZR2 View Post
Agree; this was intended to be very much "for fun" just because I wanted to see the stuff myself..

IIRC its either 17 or 32 micron, per the wix website; one of those values is for the 617 the other for the 603, I think...

Wix website at least has a number. Where else would you look it up?
You can go to the Baldwin site. Baldwin and Hastings are part of the same company and the filters for the 617.952 are the same and were made in the USA.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 05-07-2019, 01:02 PM
777funk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,031
Maybe they know something we don't about filtering. Still that doesn't look good. I wonder about WIX filters.
__________________
-E300d '99 350k
-Suburban '93 220k
-TDI Jetta '03 350k
Sold
-F250 '96 7.3
-Dodge Ram 12V
-E320 '95 200k
-E320 Wagon 1994 155k
-300d Turbo '87 187k miles
-E320 1994 200k
-300d Turbo '84 245k (sold to Dan62)
-300d Turbo '84 180k
-300sd '80 300k
-7.3 Powerstroke Diesel 15P Van 500k+ miles
-190d '89 Non Turbo 2.5 5cyl 240k (my first MB)
Tom's Imports of Columbia MO Ruined the IP in changing leaky delivery valve O-Rings - Refused to stand behind his work. Mid-MO MB drivers-AVOID Tom's.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 05-07-2019, 01:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oberlin, OH
Posts: 641
Worrying about filters is misplaced worry imho.

If it is MB OEM, you are good. Go on to the next item requiring attention on your vehicle.
__________________
-- Chris

'95 E300, 216k miles, Silver Surfer
'05 E320 CDI, 138k miles
'07 S550 4matic, 69k miles

Gone but not forgotten:

'76 300D, 350k miles?, SOLD in 1995
'75 240D, 300k miles, SOLD in 1991
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 05-07-2019, 03:58 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 3,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by chronometers View Post
Worrying about filters is misplaced worry imho.

If it is MB OEM, you are good. Go on to the next item requiring attention on your vehicle.
Cant say better than that.
__________________
2012 BMW X5 (Beef + Granite suspension model)

1995 E300D - The original humming machine (consumed by Flood 2017)
2000 E320 - The evolution (consumed by flood 2017)
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 05-07-2019, 06:09 PM
spock505's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Blighty
Posts: 1,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHZR2 View Post
First off, there was no real question upfront. As I stated before, we have known for a long time that many of the filters are packed with this sort of media. There is no international incident here just because I opened up a new one and posted the pics.
The overall inference is that this stuff is either a) no good or b) filter makers are being cheap skates by using such media - this is the overwhelming takeaway from anyone reading these threads.

Your original s a good one as it provokes comment, however those comments were more to the side of 'floor shavings' and such without any real evidence.

Without intervention it will just go around in circles without conclusion, plus I have just contacted Virgil to ask him what type of filter is fitted to Thunderbird 4

__________________
David


1996 Mercedes S124 E300TD - 129k - rolling restoration project -

1998 Mercedes W210 300TD - 118k (assimilated into above vehicle)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page