Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 11-16-2007, 06:35 PM
Larry Delor's Avatar
What, Me Worry?
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Sarasota, Fl.
Posts: 3,115
Are some of the Radar installations still equipped with vacuum tube equipment, or did they finally get those all updated?

__________________
It is a truism that almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so. Robert A. Heinlein


09 Jetta TDI
1985 300D
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-17-2007, 01:04 AM
WVOtoGO's Avatar
Up & Over
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Usually, in the skies above you.
Posts: 151
It's time for the "Let's Say..." Game !!

Let’s say airport “A”, and the ATC at airport “A” can handle 30 incoming flights an hour. That’s one flight every two minutes. Not a problem.
Now let’s say that the FAA states there has to be a minimum time spacing of at least one minute between arriving flights. OK - Not a problem.
And we have enough gates at airport “A” to have one gate being vacated every two minutes. That’s good. No problem.

So now let’s say we have flights coming from airports “B”, “C” and “D” and they all are lined up and spaced so that they are two minutes apart heading into airport “A”. Again – Not a problem.

This is all real easy in a perfect world. And this is also how many of the airport/flight loads and ATC requirements are calculated in the real world today.

So now we have everything at airport “A” running just peachy-keen.

Here’s just a few of the contributing factors:
In an effort to make money - The airlines will attempt fill every two minute slot with a full load going into airport “A”. (Sounds like a good business plan.)
In an effort to operate safely – The ATC at airport “A” will try to keep everyone two minutes apart. (Shouldn’t be a problem.)
In an effort to operate smoothly – The airlines using airport “A” will try to vacate a gate every two minutes. (Ok – sounds good.)
In an effort to keep you safe in the sky – TSA will try to get everything checked so that a gate is vacated with a full load every two minutes. (Of course ! After all. The only thing more important than your safety to those folks is keeping you on time.)
Let’s add the Dobbs trucks and the fuel crews doing their best to keep things moving smoothly. (Never been a problem with food or fuel deliveries in the history of catering or OPEC. Thus - Should be fine.)
And, God forbid we leave out the most important cog in the machine. All the passengers and all the folks related to getting said passengers to airport “A,” are doing everything they can to keep things running smoothly, and on time.

Sounds fool proof to me !!

But actually - Airport “A” is a great big open gear box just waiting for a loose wrench to fall into it.

I’m sure that every member of this forum can come up with all kinds of “wrenches” that they’ve either experienced or know of, that can (and do) cause airport “A” to come to a screeching halt.

The way I see it. If we posted them on this thread, by next week we would have enough reasons (or wrenches in the gears) as to why the airport/airline/faa/atc/airplane/taxi/baggage/tsa/istayedataholidayinnexpresslastnight system doesn’t work the way we always want it to. Or think that it should.

From such a list/thread, maybe then we could come up with someone to blame for it all.
__________________
1980 300D - Veggie Burner !
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-17-2007, 01:14 AM
Larry Delor's Avatar
What, Me Worry?
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Sarasota, Fl.
Posts: 3,115
For me, its been starters on A320's.
__________________
It is a truism that almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so. Robert A. Heinlein


09 Jetta TDI
1985 300D
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-17-2007, 01:16 AM
Mistress's Avatar
No crying in baseball
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Inside a vortex
Posts: 626
Thank you, WVO we were waiting....

You saw "Pushing Tin," didn't you? I'll be by around 2:00p.m. for my ride with the Mrs. and Svetlana.....sorry for the detour folks.
__________________
"It's normal for these things to empty your wallet and break your heart in the process."
2012 SLK 350
1987 420 SEL
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-17-2007, 01:24 AM
WVOtoGO's Avatar
Up & Over
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Usually, in the skies above you.
Posts: 151
Saw the flick a few years back. Good one, for sure.

I PM'd you on the other line.
__________________
1980 300D - Veggie Burner !
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-17-2007, 01:32 AM
Jim B.'s Avatar
Who's flying this thing ?
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N. California./ N. Nevada
Posts: 3,611
You are making us all so jealous

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mistress View Post
You have no idea how crowed air space is...I was flying last Sunday right out side the ADIZ and within 3 minutes I had lots of company...
Oh, man, Sid, that must be fun, to get to be able to toss out throwaway lines, like that one......

"I've decided to take flying lessons. I've had it with the ground"

"And then we heard "Newsweek" was looking for us in Paris"...
__________________
1991 560 SEC AMG, 199k <---- 300 hp 10:1 ECE euro HV ...

1995 E 420, 170k "The Red Plum" (sold)

2015 BMW 535i xdrive awd Stage 1 DINAN, 6k, <----364 hp

1967 Mercury Cougar, 49k

2013 Jaguar XF, 20k <----340 hp Supercharged, All Wheel Drive (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-17-2007, 02:35 AM
WVOtoGO's Avatar
Up & Over
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Usually, in the skies above you.
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mistress View Post
You have no idea how crowed air space is...I was flying last Sunday right out side the ADIZ and within 3 minutes I had lots of company...
Now didn't Martha teach you not to tease the ADIZ commanders?

__________________
1980 300D - Veggie Burner !
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-17-2007, 01:23 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
Are landings and take-offs evenly distributed over a 24 hr period at all airports?

If not, I can offer a solution.

B
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-17-2007, 04:33 PM
LaughingGravy's Avatar
Mmm.... Diesel.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: N. NJ
Posts: 434
Botnst reminds me of something else.
Newark (EWR) airport used to be a 24/7 airport. You used to be able to get red-eyes in and out at all times, obviously fewer in the hours between 11pm and 6AM, but flights nonetheless.
Now, EWR is all but completely shut down for passenger flights after 10PM and before 6AM. That's a solid 1/3 of the day where people used to be able to get cheaper flights and did.

That would alleviate a lot of congestion. There are a lot of people who would appreciate early and late flights if it meant getting to sleep in their own beds instead of spending yet another night away from home.


Technically, yes the airport is open, and a small number of flights still happen, but that number is ridiculously small and goes back to poor utilization of facilities.
__________________
85' 300D No inspection, No registration fees, Cheap insurance
"If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're going to see some serious %$&^."
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-17-2007, 04:56 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Building more airports and paying more for your ticket would probably go a long way to improving things.

If we would build one of those 300mph maglev trains and run a couple up and down the east coast, from say DC, to NY, to Boston, that would help a lot. Both on I95 and in the airports.

But God forbid we put any money into a 21st century mass transit system.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-18-2007, 01:23 AM
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,429
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
All airlines have a fixed number of aircraft.

By definition, every one of these aircraft flies every single day, unless it's in for scheduled maintenance. None of the serviceable aircraft are parked. The are all put into service because any revenue is better than no revenue.

On the holidays, there are no additional aircraft to be utilized. The same number of aircraft exist on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving as exist today.

Therefore, the routes that are flown by the various aircraft are not "more crowded" during a holiday, and the suggestion that military airways will help alleviate overcrowding is preposterous.
Good input.
__________________
'06 E320 CDI
'17 Corvette Stingray Vert
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-18-2007, 02:28 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaughingGravy View Post
Technically, yes the airport is open, and a small number of flights still happen, but that number is ridiculously small and goes back to poor utilization of facilities.
There's a rather good reason why there are few flights between 10 p.m and 6 a.m.

If you will recall the days of the red eyes, the number of people on the aircraft was typically not more than 50-60.

That's a losing proposition in today's economics. If you can find 150 people who want to leave SFO for EWR at 6:00 p.m. the airline would be happy to accommodate you.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-18-2007, 03:00 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
There's a rather good reason why there are few flights between 10 p.m and 6 a.m.

If you will recall the days of the red eyes, the number of people on the aircraft was typically not more than 50-60.

That's a losing proposition in today's economics. If you can find 150 people who want to leave SFO for EWR at 6:00 p.m. the airline would be happy to accommodate you.
Yes, that's right.

If the number of runways is limited and the number of minutes in a day is limited then ....
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-18-2007, 04:08 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 52,219
I just read what Bush had said and what this was all being done for.

The delays and cancellations during the holidays have nothing to do with ‘congestion’. As someone pointed out, we have the same flights every day of the. The problem is the people who work for the airline (or not as the case may be).

I work in an operational department. Being an airline, we have planes in the air 24/7/365. Non-pencil-pushing management is needed 24/7/365. When I was hired I was specifically asked if I was willing to work nights, weekends, birthdays, holidays and any day ending with the letter “y”. Like a wide eyed kid in a candy store I said yes. I have 8 years with American and I still am not even close to holding the holidays off for vacation. I was raised by my mom and dad to do what is right (the bastards had to give me a conscience) so as a result I have not been home for the holidays in 18 years. We have our holiday when I am off.

The point this is leading too is that during the holidays, the ‘sick list’ for all operational departments will go through the roof. My department can make due since we can split up the work among those who showed up and make it work. The FAA requires that there be at least 3 flight attendants on a Super 80. If I do not have 3 on board, that plane is not going any where.

Our sick list as well as other carriers will sky rocket. The service will be worse than normal since the larger planes (757, 767, 777,747 …) will be staffed at minimum and the remaining crew will have to work that much harder. We will be moving what ever crews do show up around to other flights and those flights will be delayed until I or one of my co-workers find a crew. In the event that we do not find a crew (which during the holidays will happen) we will cancel the flight and do our best to re accommodate the passengers on other flights that are packed to the gills already.

Not sure who told W his idea had a chance in hell of helping (probably the same dub ass who planed Iraq) but the cancellations and delays, if not weather related, have nothing to do with what he is changing.
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-18-2007, 04:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 247
People in the airlines business should be paid more. They go through a hell of an insult wagon during the holidays. My hat to you all!
If the job was better paying there will be more people to cover and more pride in doing the job. But going back to the issue here, I think the limited number of runways is really a problem. "Freeing" up more air space is not going to alleviate the landing or takeoff bottlenecks.
Someone else mentioned the maglev/ mass transit: we needed that like yesterday...

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page