Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-19-2009, 06:39 AM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strife View Post
This is a big battle going on now between the car manufacturers and the EPA - the formula to credit an electric or (mostly) electric car with some equivalent highway MPG rating. There's a lot of money at stake.
Seems like the formula should incorporate similar thinking to how they arrive at the Corporate fuel ratings--total miles divied by total gallons.
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-19-2009, 07:24 AM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
Seems like the formula should incorporate similar thinking to how they arrive at the Corporate fuel ratings--total miles divied by total gallons.
That ignores the energy required to charge the batteries.

I think 35MPG is doable for many vehicles. Anyone who has been paying attention realizes that 35 is not a huge step. Look at the numbers - http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_04_23.html The MPG ratings have been fairly static in some classes, while posting modest gains in others.
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-19-2009, 09:58 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 254
Bye anything over 2,750 pounds.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-19-2009, 10:48 AM
SwampYankee's Avatar
New England Hick
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 1,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulC View Post
Bye anything over 2,750 pounds.
Peels for everyone!
__________________

1980 300TD-China Blue/Blue MBTex-2nd Owner, 107K (Alt Blau) OBK #15
'06 Chevy Tahoe Z71 (for the wife & 4 kids, current mule) '03 Honda Odyssey (son #1's ride, reluctantly) '99 GMC Suburban (255K+ miles, semi-retired mule) 21' SeaRay Seville (summer escape pod)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-19-2009, 10:50 AM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwampYankee View Post
Peels for everyone!
I'd drive one!
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-19-2009, 12:44 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 53,015
US car manufactures have cried wolf too many times. Seat bealts.... it drive the cost up of cars. Air bags... it drive the cost up of cars. ABS, it...... OH shut the hell up already.

If my 13 yr old Diesel can get 32mpg then there is no problem getting a 4500 lb vehicle over 35mpr in 2016.
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-19-2009, 02:41 PM
SwampYankee's Avatar
New England Hick
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 1,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by pawoSD View Post
I'd drive one!
Actually I would, too. Assuming I could squeeze my fat @$$ into it.
__________________

1980 300TD-China Blue/Blue MBTex-2nd Owner, 107K (Alt Blau) OBK #15
'06 Chevy Tahoe Z71 (for the wife & 4 kids, current mule) '03 Honda Odyssey (son #1's ride, reluctantly) '99 GMC Suburban (255K+ miles, semi-retired mule) 21' SeaRay Seville (summer escape pod)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-19-2009, 10:50 AM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Jeremy Clarkson tested a high end Jag with a twin turbo V6 diesel a while back, and even driving wastefully and with all car options on and such....he still got well over 40mpg.....

If the Jetta TDI wagon can get over 40mpg.....then 35.5 should be an easy target. And I bet both of those vehicles weigh a lot more than 2,750....
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-19-2009, 06:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
I don't see the big deal either. My 2004 Jetta weighs 3000 lbs and easily gets 45 mpg. And the older ones get even better mileage because they have less power. Anyone who insists cars can't get 35 mpg 7 years from now must be smoking something. Heck, even the auto industry is going along with it this time, so what's the problem?
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-20-2009, 06:54 AM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
New lighter, more fuel efficient cars AND population control at the same time!
Eliminate safety glass, crush zones, bumpers, air bags, seat belts, ABS, ESC,4 wheel brakes. Souinds like a smart cars without all the refinements. The Peel it is
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-20-2009, 08:54 AM
waterboarding w/medmech
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Coming to your hometown
Posts: 7,987
Tata Nano anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-20-2009, 09:07 AM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by Txjake View Post
Tata Nano anyone?
You seem to have the opinion that getting decent fuel mileage will result in very small cheap cars. Detroit got you right where they want you.
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-20-2009, 09:53 AM
waterboarding w/medmech
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Coming to your hometown
Posts: 7,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbdiesel View Post
You seem to have the opinion that getting decent fuel mileage will result in very small cheap cars. Detroit got you right where they want you.
no, dont be ridiculous. I was just pointing out that the Tata, recently discussed here, would be a vehicle that would fit the requirements for the new fuel standards. BTW, there is nothing wrong with small cheap cars; part of the problem now is that the big three sold Amrica on the idea of bigger is better. When I was a kid, trucks were not the norm, people might hav ea truck for work, but most folks drove sedans or wagons. Now, the propensity is towards big truck like SUVs or 4 door trucks. Detroit made more profit on those, and I am sure would love to keep selling them.

here are some small, cheap cars that are way cool...

1. VW Beetle
2. VW Rabbit
3. Citroen DCV
4. Suzuki Metro
5. VW Polo
6. Tata Nano
7. Morris Minor
8. Mini Cooper (original)
9. MG & Triumphs of all sorts
10. Renault Le Car

wow, look, small cheap cars that I like and not one of them is from Detroit! I guess you are right, Detroit has me just where they want me....

BTW, Kudos on having a Land Cruiser, certainly a stick in the eye to fuel economy stds; I know, I have a 1968 FJ55
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:22 AM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by Txjake View Post
BTW, Kudos on having a Land Cruiser, certainly a stick in the eye to fuel economy stds; I know, I have a 1968 FJ55
Jeezus ain't that the truth... I'm toying with a 617 swap......The diesel that Toyota developed for the FJ doesn't seem worth bothering with. Currently, the big problem is the vehicle lives in CO, and I live in CT.
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:55 AM
waterboarding w/medmech
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Coming to your hometown
Posts: 7,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbdiesel View Post
Jeezus ain't that the truth... I'm toying with a 617 swap......The diesel that Toyota developed for the FJ doesn't seem worth bothering with. Currently, the big problem is the vehicle lives in CO, and I live in CT.
617? I have heard of the 4B swaps, etc. SOR sells 'half cut" diesel units to do a swap, basically front half of a foreign market Cruiser with an oil burner. It aint cheap though IH8Mud has a lot of conversion info and threads. Sounds like a road trip is in order to get your rig. You can always stop for a beer break in OKC; I'll buy.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page