Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #376  
Old 07-14-2012, 07:50 AM
engatwork's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Soperton, Ga. USA
Posts: 14,960
Quote:
welded shut
stick or tig?

__________________
Jim
  #377  
Old 07-14-2012, 08:13 AM
layback40's Avatar
Not Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria Australia - down under!!
Posts: 4,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by engatwork View Post
stick or tig?
Good to see you taking this thread as seriously as it deserves !!

BTW ~ mig actually
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group

I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort....

1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket.
1980 300D now parts car 800k miles
1984 300D 500k miles
1987 250td 160k miles English import
2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles
1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo.
1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion.
Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving
  #378  
Old 07-14-2012, 08:36 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Stick? You must be older than you say. I'll get somebody to check.
  #379  
Old 07-14-2012, 10:11 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
I believe I have posted MANY times that GW and his administration spent wildly. I submit this is at variance with your "fact".

Is it indeed a "fact" that " Republicans spend more money with reckless abandon, than the Democrats ever could."? I would ask you how you can even post such a statement when the current administration has spent more wildly than all previous administrations combined. Healthcare alone is now estimated to cost more that $2 Trillion for the first decade. Remember that they promised to keep it under $1 Trillion--so already it is a fact that they lied about that.
You have mentioned that GW spent way too much. However, you refuse to look at other past Republican administrations and compare with the Democrats of the same time period. It's not strictly GW that is the culprit here.

The current administration suffers on two levels...........spending too much and having insufficient revenue. You'd need to analyze which part of that equation dominates. I certainly won't defend this administration. The fool just doesn't understand what he's doing long term. However, with him as the exception, the Dems have contributed less to the total deficit over the past 50 years than the Repos. The legacy of this individual will not be a good one because of his disregard of basic finances.

I agree that they lied about the cost of their free health care to get it rammed through the Congress and, at the current cost, I'm afraid I cannot support it anymore.


Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
Typical Republican and Democratic administration both spend wildly--but on different interest groups.
Using history as a guide, and excepting the current occupant, the Republicans have spent more.

If you want to use the current occupant as your leverage to claim the high ground with regard to spending, have at it............but, it's weak.
  #380  
Old 07-14-2012, 10:15 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
You'd make an exemplary traffic cop.
Actually, I would be excellent at that profession. You wouldn't find any DB's going 75 in a 55.........that's for sure.
  #381  
Old 07-14-2012, 10:17 AM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
You have mentioned that GW spent way too much. However, you refuse to look at other past Republican administrations and compare with the Democrats of the same time period. It's not strictly GW that is the culprit here.

The current administration suffers on two levels...........spending too much and having insufficient revenue. You'd need to analyze which part of that equation dominates. I certainly won't defend this administration. The fool just doesn't understand what he's doing long term. However, with him as the exception, the Dems have contributed less to the total deficit over the past 50 years than the Repos. The legacy of this individual will not be a good one because of his disregard of basic finances.

I agree that they lied about the cost of their free health care to get it rammed through the Congress and, at the current cost, I'm afraid I cannot support it anymore.




Using history as a guide, and excepting the current occupant, the Republicans have spent more.

If you want to use the current occupant as your leverage to claim the high ground with regard to spending, have at it............but, it's weak.
Question. Why do we blame Obama, GW, etc, etc? After all, doesn't the President basically submit a "Mother, may I" list to Congress who takes it and screws it like a $2 hooker in a men's prison till it comes out with some of the stuff the President proposed but tons of other stuff he never agreed to but will have to if he wants some of his stuff to go thru? IOW a hostage situation?
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
  #382  
Old 07-14-2012, 10:18 AM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
Actually, I would be excellent at that profession. You wouldn't find any DB's going 75 in a 55.........that's for sure.
A traffic cop gets paid. Did you?
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
  #383  
Old 07-14-2012, 10:23 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by aklim View Post
Question. Why do we blame Obama, GW, etc, etc? After all, doesn't the President basically submit a "Mother, may I" list to Congress who takes it and screws it like a $2 hooker in a men's prison till it comes out with some of the stuff the President proposed but tons of other stuff he never agreed to but will have to if he wants some of his stuff to go thru? IOW a hostage situation?
If he has the balls, he can veto the budget...........or threaten to veto it.

He has quite a bit of influence over the Congress, depending on how much political capital he wants to invest. Mr. Clinton was a master of this game............the current occupant, not so much.
  #384  
Old 07-14-2012, 10:24 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by aklim View Post
A traffic cop gets paid. Did you?
Rhetorical.
  #385  
Old 07-14-2012, 02:21 PM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
If he has the balls, he can veto the budget...........or threaten to veto it.

He has quite a bit of influence over the Congress, depending on how much political capital he wants to invest. Mr. Clinton was a master of this game............the current occupant, not so much.
Or the party in power can refuse to even pass a budget after turning down the President's plan.
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
  #386  
Old 07-14-2012, 02:33 PM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
Or the party in power can refuse to even pass a budget after turning down the President's plan.
And give up a chance of getting some of their own pork in the budget? I let your pork in, you let mine and we shove it to the President for signature. Can he veto? Sure? But all or nothing. He does not have line item veto so we have a hostage situation.

In the meantime, the clock is ticking and the President gets more heat. So unless he is really popular like Clinton was, at the very least, he'd be sticking his political future and be pissing off his own party who wants their pork.
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
  #387  
Old 07-14-2012, 02:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 25
Has Obama administration spent more money than all previous presidents?








Answer:

In absolute terms, yes.

The Public Debt of the United States when Obama started office (Jan 2009) was about $9.8 Trillion. As of Jan 2012, it is just over $14.4 Trillion. For comparison, G.W. Bush started in 2001 with about $5.8 Trillion in debt, and finished with $9.8 Trillion.

As for the size of the Federal Budget, it has averaged $3.5 Trillion / year under Obama, and $2.5 Trillion / year under G.W. Bush.

All figures are per the OMB and CBOE, which are the White House and Congress' accountants.

There are several major caveats to the above numbers, however. Firstly, one must also remember to INFLATION-ADJUST all figures before doing a comparison, as $1 in 1900 is worth significantly more than $1 in 2000. Secondly, the G.W. Bush numbers do NOT include "emergency expenditures" for military purposes, while the Obama numbers DO include them; in essence, cost for warfighting during the G.W. Bush Administration was hidden "off the books", and went directly onto the deficit, without being reported on the Budget. Lastly, and this is a BIG NOTE: Presidents (of any party) do not spend money. They have virtually no control over how the United States allocates its money - that duty (and responsibility) falls to Congress. While a President does have a veto, the reality of modern politics is that spending bills are almost always rolled up into massive "omnibus" bills, which are politically impossible to veto. So, the sole responsibility for spending in the United States now falls on Congress, not whichever President holds that office at the time.
  #388  
Old 07-14-2012, 02:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 25
This claim, that the CBO’s 2012 estimate suggests Obamacare will cost twice as much as originally projected when the bill was passed in 2010, has been widely trumpeted, by some rather doggedly, as another Obamacare failure, but unfortunately, it’s entirely dishonest accounting........



But the CBO’s new projections don’t substantially alter the picture we got in 2010, and it’s utterly dishonest to claim otherwise.


http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/03-13-Coverage%20Estimates.pdf
  #389  
Old 07-14-2012, 03:36 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern California, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
In the lower right hand corner of the main screen, you'll see "mod" on the blue bar.

Press it and you go to the moderator panel where you can check out all kinds of things such as IP addresses and find the list of banned members. On that list, you can see who was banned, the date, and when (if) the ban expires.
There are about 900 banned members right now. Most are banned for spam and for using multiple accounts.
__________________
Paul S.

2001 E430, Bourdeaux Red, Oyster interior.
79,200 miles.

1973 280SE 4.5, 170,000 miles. 568 Signal Red, Black MB Tex. "The Red Baron".
  #390  
Old 07-14-2012, 03:41 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by suginami View Post
There are about 900 banned members right now. Most are banned for spam and for using multiple accounts.
Yes, the Webmaster needs to cleanup that list. Hundreds of banned members for spam makes the list largely unusable.

Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2026 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page