Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 06-19-2015, 07:41 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulfiqar View Post
Yes I have, good lord that was an experience.

I couldnt understand whose idea it was to place the starter in the valley of the engine.
Packaging. I remember when that engine was a new thing and it sounded like a great idea at the time. I'm guessing whoever signed off on the idea didn't have much/any experience in RAM-D testing. That's Reliability, Availability, Maintainability, and Durability. I worked in that field for a few years. It's best if your stuff just doesn't break during the design life expectancy, but if it does, you want it to be quick and easy to swap out. The original Porsche 911 is pretty good in that respect. It's designed along the lines of a race car in that it's expected that things will break and it's pretty easy to get to things and swap them out quickly.

__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-19-2015, 08:38 AM
tbomachines's Avatar
ಠ_ಠ
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 9,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmac2012 View Post
Dang. That does look challenging:




Unfortunately they also had a penchant for blowing head gaskets. I wouldn't want to be having to replace the rear HG or even changing spark plugs for that matter. There is a reason they are really cheap to purchase.


Sent from an abacus
__________________
TC
Current stable:
- 2004 Mazda RALLYWANKEL
- 2007 Saturn sky redline
- 2004 Explorer...under surgery.

Past: 135i, GTI, 300E, 300SD, 300SD, Stealth
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-19-2015, 09:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 3,999
The problem is not just limited to the gasket blowing out, the threads in the cylinder block strip out. You you get a can of worms in your hands.
__________________
2012 BMW X5 (Beef + Granite suspension model)

1995 E300D - The original humming machine (consumed by Flood 2017)
2000 E320 - The evolution (consumed by flood 2017)
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-19-2015, 10:01 AM
tbomachines's Avatar
ಠ_ಠ
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 9,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulfiqar View Post
The problem is not just limited to the gasket blowing out, the threads in the cylinder block strip out. You you get a can of worms in your hands.

Just makes you wonder why the heck they used the engine all those years. Granted when they are running right they are supposedly very nice, smooth and torquey...I'm sure Tyler can add his experience here. I may be mistaken but I think the only RWD car that they had the northstar on was the XLR?


Sent from an abacus
__________________
TC
Current stable:
- 2004 Mazda RALLYWANKEL
- 2007 Saturn sky redline
- 2004 Explorer...under surgery.

Past: 135i, GTI, 300E, 300SD, 300SD, Stealth
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-19-2015, 10:48 AM
Simpler=Better's Avatar
Ham Shanker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,544
Starter in the valley sounds great to me. You replace it what, every 100k? That's about time to refresh the intake gasket anyway. Keeps the starter out of the salt too.
__________________
$60 OM617 Blank Exhaust Flanges
$110 OM606 Blank Exhaust Flanges
No merc at the moment
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 06-19-2015, 11:52 AM
A Talent for Obfuscation
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: In the Deep State
Posts: 19,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbomachines View Post
Just makes you wonder why the heck they used the engine all those years. Granted when they are running right they are supposedly very nice, smooth and torquey...I'm sure Tyler can add his experience here. I may be mistaken but I think the only RWD car that they had the northstar on was the XLR?


Sent from an abacus
If you want to stretch things a bit, you could include the install of the 4.0 liter Olds Aurora Northstar into the RWD Shelby Series 1 during the late Nineties/early Aughts.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 06-19-2015, 06:57 PM
TylerH860's Avatar
KHAAAAAAN-gress
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 5,187
When this engine was developed it was quite an achievement. It was lighter (all aluminum), compact (4.6 Liter) , and more powerful (300HP) than the Europeans. Lots of neat little details designed for durability and ease of maintenance. The engine was actually designed to be able to drive 50 miles without coolant with no damage. Unfortunately they had a fatal flaw with the head gasket bolts, and were put into poorly designed cars/engine bays. You also had poor quality seals/gaskets. It was a huge step forward considering the heavy, larger, and only 200HP V8 it replaced.

I had a 98 STS and loved it. Currently driving the last of the Northstars, a 2007 DTS. They are pretty much worthless value wise and far more reliable than given credit, especially the 2007, but working on them is a huge pain. I think with an extra few inches in the back bay, better head gasket bolts, seals and gaskets, we would be talking about this engine in the same breath as the 3.8 V6.
__________________
1985 500SL Euro w/ AMG bits 130k
1984 300SD Turbodiesel 192k
1980 240D Stick China 188k
2001 CLK55 AMG 101k
2007 S600 Biturbo 149k Overheated Project, IT'S ALIVE!!!

Last edited by TylerH860; 06-19-2015 at 07:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 06-20-2015, 09:17 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 902
The 4.7 liter Toyota V8 has the starter in the valley as well. But that is a fabulous engine IMHO. My '98 LC has almost 300K miles on it.

Rgds,
Chris W.
'95 E300D, 444K
__________________
Objects in closer are mirror than they appear.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 06-21-2015, 01:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 3,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbomachines View Post
Just makes you wonder why the heck they used the engine all those years. Granted when they are running right they are supposedly very nice, smooth and torquey...I'm sure Tyler can add his experience here. I may be mistaken but I think the only RWD car that they had the northstar on was the XLR?


Sent from an abacus
as tyler pointed out the engine was quite advanced than the one it replaced, as usual with GM - their design is good, their execution is a total failure sometimes.

The engine is meant to rev like a motorcycle, its actually specified to leak some oil past its oil rings to keep them nicely lubed, they have collosal failures of the head bolt threads in the block, however there are some repair kits now that repair this issue quite good (I used it on my camry)

The engine cradle was sealed with rubber gasket which leaked after a while, GM's update to use threebond sealant repairs that permanently (actually violence is required to remove the bond - I love that sealant).

But as the car aged through its life, it was seen as a collosal failure because of such leaks and HG failures, repairs were not fast or cheap either and not everyone wrenches on their vehicles.
__________________
2012 BMW X5 (Beef + Granite suspension model)

1995 E300D - The original humming machine (consumed by Flood 2017)
2000 E320 - The evolution (consumed by flood 2017)
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 06-22-2015, 06:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Posts: 5,480
I'd nominate just about any V6 FWD van!

Happy Motoring, Mark
__________________
DrDKW
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 06-22-2015, 09:30 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerH860 View Post
When this engine was developed it was quite an achievement. It was lighter (all aluminum), compact (4.6 Liter) , and more powerful (300HP) than the Europeans. Lots of neat little details designed for durability and ease of maintenance. The engine was actually designed to be able to drive 50 miles without coolant with no damage. Unfortunately they had a fatal flaw with the head gasket bolts, and were put into poorly designed cars/engine bays. You also had poor quality seals/gaskets. It was a huge step forward considering the heavy, larger, and only 200HP V8 it replaced.

I had a 98 STS and loved it. Currently driving the last of the Northstars, a 2007 DTS. They are pretty much worthless value wise and far more reliable than given credit, especially the 2007, but working on them is a huge pain. I think with an extra few inches in the back bay, better head gasket bolts, seals and gaskets, we would be talking about this engine in the same breath as the 3.8 V6.
And if I could jump 44" vertically and was 7'-3, I probably would have been an excellent basketball player!

__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page