View Single Post
  #2  
Old 03-13-2012, 12:42 AM
ROLLGUY's Avatar
ROLLGUY ROLLGUY is offline
ROLLGUY
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,260
I think if the only thing changed is the engine (keeping the 4 spd behind the 617), your MPG would not be what it was with the 4 cyl. I am not familiar with the OM617 numbers, but if it is a turbo, you would need to change the rear end ratio (higher=lower numerically) to get anything close to 30 MPG. (EDIT: just re-read that the donor is an '85, so it is turbo)
If you are close to CA, I could use a 240 bottom end!
Reply With Quote