![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Biomass based diesel vs biodiesel
I went to fill up at what I thought was a B20 pump in Fremont, CA yesterday when I was greeted by this confusing set of stickers.
http://i.imgur.com/hV72fAY.jpg Quote:
http://i.imgur.com/h66RuaD.jpg It was cheap. $2.75/gal when most stations are selling diesel at $3 or more. Regular unleaded at the same station was $2.79. Labeling confusion Well-Worth Products, Inc.: Articles - White Paper on Emergency Backup Power Generators and Fire Pumps Quote:
Biomass Diesel: Rising Star of the Renewable Fuel Standard | Bioenergy Connection Quote:
Propel Diesel HPR Quote:
Has anybody else tried this stuff? I'm curious to see how the fuel economy of this stuff compares to the conventional diesel I usually buy. EDIT: From what I've read so far the one big disadvantage biomass diesel has vs biodiesel is relatively poor lubricity. The manufacturer has to add the same lubricity additives as regular diesel (hence the 98% label) in order to bring the HFRR number below the 520 micron threshold. With regular diesel I was using 1% straight soybean oil to improve lubricity and I'm going to continue to do so with this stuff. So very good cetane but only average lubricity. EDIT 2: Quote:
EDIT 3 Propel Fuels is purchasing its renewable diesel from Nests oil of Finland (see above) AKA NexBTL. This confirms its 75+ cetane. Quote:
EDIT 4: Cetane info for anyone mixing it with regular diesel. The stuff sold at the pumps in California is 98% HVO. Quote:
EDIT 5: Here's where the fuel comes from and how its made. http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/2a2b/apps/neste-aus-rpt-031513.pdf
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words ![]() Last edited by tjts1; 03-04-2015 at 02:26 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
That's cool. I believe most of it is sold in CA. Round here it just gets mixed in with the regular pipeline supply so there's no way to know what amount of "green diesel" you're getting.
It's the high science version of the biodiesel we all know with the capability to be produced from the nastiest of the nasty feedstocks.
__________________
Current fleet 2006 E320 CDI 1992 300D - 5speed manual swapped former members 1984 300D "Blues Mobile" 1978 300CD "El Toro" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What station in Fremont did you find this at?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Chevron station at:
39707 Paseo Padre Pkwy - Fremont, CA
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
i came here to ask about this same product. i just filled up in oakland today where i used to get b20. i was kinda angry at first because i thought it was some gimmicky way of saying D2 but apparently its "biodiesel" made from animal fats ? i put it in a 617 which can run on anything so im not worried about that, but im interested to see whether it provides more power than biodiesel and/or if it maintains the smooth and quiet running effects.
__________________
1981 NA 300D 310k miles |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The only noticible difference is the engine is extremely smooth after a cold start. It was 45f this morning and usually I get a bit more vibration after the first minute of running at this temp. This morning, nothing. Dead smooth from the moment I turned the key. I can't seem to find specifications for this particular fuel but one web site claims hydrotreated biomass diesel is 80+ cetane If thats true it would exceed even the best biodiesel. I'm going to contact the seller for a data sheet. I took some comparison pics of 100% petro diesel (left, yellow) and biomass diesel (right, clear). petro diesel vs biomass based diesel - Album on Imgur
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words ![]() Last edited by tjts1; 02-15-2015 at 03:30 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Interesting coincidence. I've been up in the Bay Area for the last few weeks and found the "Propel Fuels" vendors offering B-20, so I've been running my '98 on it for the first time ever. (I was hoping for a quick cure for the one-cylinder nailing at idle & cold start miss issue, but alas no miracle occurred.)
Before heading down to So-Cal today, I went to fill up at a different Propel vendor (in Oakland on Grand Ave.) and found this HPR stuff instead of the B-20. I filled up with it (half a tank) so I effectively had a 40/50/10 mix of D2, HPR, & Biodiesel. Ran the car HARD, and I mean REALLY FLIPPING HARD on the I-5 Autobahn to hopefully blow out as much carbon as possible prior to attempting glow plug replacement in the next week or two. About Diesel HPR | Propel Diesel HPR If this stuff truly has an astronomical cetane rating, it will be interesting to see how it starts in the AM tomorrow. If it helped smooth out tjts1's cold start, I wonder if it will decrease my cold start single cylinder miss & nailing. I'll revisit this thread and keep you updated.
__________________
Current rolling stock: 2001 E55 183,000+ Newest member of the fleet. 2002 E320 83,000 - The "cream-puff"! 1992 500E 217,000+ 1995 E300D 412,000+ 1998 E300D 155,000+ 2001 E320 227,000+ 2001 E320 Wagon, 177,000+ Prior MBZ’s: 1952 220 Cab A 1966 300SE 1971 280SE 1973 350SLC (euro) 1980 450SLC 1980 450SLC (#2) 1978 450SLC 5.0 1984 300D ~243,000 & fondly remembered 1993 500E - sorely missed. ![]() 1975 VW Scirocco w/ slightly de-tuned Super-Vee engine - Sold after 30+ years. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
i'm now wondering how much of the fuel is from renewable sources. i forget what the label on the pump was. if there is little to no d2 blended then this will be my fuel of choice. i know that by law B20 was the maximum they could provide at a self service pump, anything above required signing waivers. but i'm wondering since this is supposedly identical in structure to petroleum maybe they can supply 100% biomass?
__________________
1981 NA 300D 310k miles |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The HPR pump in Fremont said 98% biomass (pic in first post). I'm really liking this stuff so far. The engine is quieter, more eager to rev and from what I can see in my rear view mirror no smoke when I floor it at any RPM. Thats with a 50/50 mix in the tank of left over conventional diesel and HPR. After I run down this tank I'll try this fuel on its own.
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words ![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
1981 NA 300D 310k miles |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Thats almost worth driving down 1 hour for.
__________________
![]() Chris 84 280sl 82 300d euro |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, good stuff indeed!
Update: This HPR stuff seems pretty darn good. I've had a single cylinder cold-start alternating miss/nailing that settles down into a light nailing at idle after about 20 seconds of run time.
During the last two morning's cold start, the cylinder missed maybe 3-4 times instead of 10-12 times during the first 15 seconds or so before settling down. And once it is running stably, the nailing is significantly reduced in intensity, almost to where you barely hear it. So the increased cetane rating seems to make a significant difference there. Overall, the engine seems to be significantly smoother overall plus it seems as though it has more power too. Or it could be the placebo effect. ![]() Although I haven't finished out the tank yet, it seems as though the mileage is too good to be true for the hard driving that took place. (I'll know when I fill & top off the tank to calculate it.) Now how much of this is directly attributable to the 50/50 HPR/B20 blend in the tank is debatable, as the kamikaze run down I-5 to blow the snot/carbon/cobwebs out of the engine is also a contributory factor. Change more than one parameter at a time, and... well, you know. IDK... but if the HPR were available where I live I would most definitely keep using it.
__________________
Current rolling stock: 2001 E55 183,000+ Newest member of the fleet. 2002 E320 83,000 - The "cream-puff"! 1992 500E 217,000+ 1995 E300D 412,000+ 1998 E300D 155,000+ 2001 E320 227,000+ 2001 E320 Wagon, 177,000+ Prior MBZ’s: 1952 220 Cab A 1966 300SE 1971 280SE 1973 350SLC (euro) 1980 450SLC 1980 450SLC (#2) 1978 450SLC 5.0 1984 300D ~243,000 & fondly remembered 1993 500E - sorely missed. ![]() 1975 VW Scirocco w/ slightly de-tuned Super-Vee engine - Sold after 30+ years. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
i was just going to say this seems to have, at least partially, solved my injector nailing problem
__________________
1981 NA 300D 310k miles |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
its cheap. cheaper than diesel and i think only a dime more than unleaded at the station i was at. definitely worth filling up some carboys with it.
__________________
1981 NA 300D 310k miles |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
A few more bits of information I've been able to dig up. The manufacturer claims its "40% higher cetane than conventional diesel". If they are comparing it to CA 53 minimum cetane, that would make this 74 cetane. Another hydrotreated vegetable oil manufacturer in Europe is claiming 80+ cetane.
The end product goes by several different names depending on the market: biomass based diesel (US FTC name) green diesel HVO- hydrotreated vegetable oil reneweable diesel paraffinic diesel The hydrotreating process can be applied to any number of feed stocks including animal fats, plant oils, crude oil, natural gas (GTL -gas to liquid fuel) and even gassified wood. Regardless of the feedstock, the hydrotreating process yields essentially the same thing. A very high cetane, high energy density, low lubricity fuel that is clear in color and can be run in all diesel engine at any ratio unlike biodiesel. NEXBTL Renewable Diesel vs. Fossil Diesel Don't try this at home: http://youtu.be/9n9223uQgiA The downside is LUBRICITY. In the US diesel fuel has to have an HFRR of less than 520 micron. In Europe its less than 460 micron. While biodiesel has very good lubricity (less than 300 micron) the hydrotreated fuel is much worse... 640 micron. The manufacturer has to put lubricity additives in the fuel in order for it to meet the ASTM D975 standard in the US of less than 520 micron wear scar. I would suggest using a lubricity additive with this fuel just to be sure (TCW3, WVO, SVO etc). ![]() HVO is old name for our "biomass diesel" EN590 is Euro spec petrolium diesel similar to current ULSD GTL - natural gas to liquid fuel usually produced through Fischer–Tropsch process FAME - Fatty acid methyl esters, aka biodiesel Notice that HVO has a higher energy density per KG but slightly lower energy density per liter than conventional diesel. Too bad we don't by fuel by the KG or LB. Also notice how they fudged on the lubricity by saying well they all have to meet the same 460 micron lubricity standard so theres no diff IF the lubricity additives are there. Biodiesel is in the 300 micron range without the additives. In this PDF they buried the lubricity of the fuel in a footnote on page 15. ![]()
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words ![]() Last edited by tjts1; 02-18-2015 at 02:00 AM. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|