![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cold air intake?
These look cool, but are they not advised. Has anybody seen or used anything like these on their diesel mercedes? Not refering to the propane injection just the airintakes with oil separator...
http://www.wade************************/diesel.html |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
What the hell? How is that better than the stock system?
__________________
1985 CA 300D Turbo , 213K mi |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Those are not cold air intakes they are hot air intakes. The factory intake gets air through the tube in front of the radiator, those get air from behind the radiator. Stupid.
__________________
'83 240D with 617.952 and 2.88 '01 VW Beetle TDI '05 Jeep Liberty CRD '89 Toyota 4x4, needs 2L-T '78 280Z with L28ET - 12.86@110 Oil Burner Kartel #35 http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b1...oD/bioclip.jpg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Hahahahahahaha! Here we go again. RT
__________________
When all else fails, vote from the rooftops! 84' Mercedes Benz 300D Anthracite/black, 171K 03' Volkswagen Jetta TDI blue/black, 93K 93' Chevrolet C2500HD ExCab 6.5TD, Two-tone blue, 252K |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
One thing that still bothers me is the fact that the air box on the 87 300D doesnt have a intake duct next to the radiator like the 617's in the W123 and W126 had. So would it make a difference whether it had the stock filter or the "cold air" intake? The intake on the air box just points towards the fender which doesnt seem to get to much air coming through it?
They didnt add the vents on the passanger side fender until the 2.5T came out in the W124.
__________________
Current: 05 E320 CDI 07 GL320 CDI 08 Sprinter 05 Dodge Cummins 01 Dodge Cummins Previous 2004 E55 AMG 2002 C32 AMG (#2) 1995 E300 1978 300D 1987 300D 2002 C32 AMG(blown motor :[ 1981 300SD 1983 300SD 1987 300SDL 2002 Jetta TDI 1996 S420 1995 S500 1993 190E 2.6 1992 190E 2.3 1985 190E 2.3 5-Speed |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
All of Mercedes' diesel intakes are cold air intakes from the factory.
Wade performance is a complete CON. EVERY ONE of their "cold" air intakes is a HOT air intake. Don't even consider propane, it is not worth the time/money. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
From looking at the design, I don't see how it could increase "performance". Frankly, I feel most of the ads for "performance intakes and exhausts" for most cars is nothing more than cosmetics.
However, I have seen several folks report that the main reason they went to such an intake is it eliminated their problem with broken air cleaner mounts. But valve adjustments, matched injectors, and new engine mounts usually cure that problem.
__________________
Sam 84 300SD 350K+ miles ( Blue Belle ) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Wade Performance, I think this guy sells on E-Bay under the name
steelwindow. this looks like the same guy. Charlie
__________________
there were three HP ratings on the OM616... 1) Not much power 2) Even less power 3) Not nearly enough power!! 240D w/auto Anyone that thinks a 240D is slow drives too fast. 80 240D Naturally Exasperated, 4-Spd 388k DD 150mph spedo 3:58 Diff We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I believe the original poster was speaking about the oil separator 3/4 down the page. He understands the filters are "not advised".
__________________
Adam Lumsden (83) 300D Vice-President of the MBCA International Stars Section |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I might like one of their spiffy red oil separators though.
__________________
green 85 300SD 200K miles "Das Schlepper Frog" With a OM603 TBO360 turbo ( To be intercooled someday ![]() ![]() ![]() white 79 300SD 200K'ish miles "Farfegnugen" (RIP - cracked crank) desert storm primer 63 T-bird "The Undead" (long term hibernation) http://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig692a.png |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, the price is certainly right. I made one out of PVC, and the materials cost was close to $20, almost as much.
__________________
'83 240D with 617.952 and 2.88 '01 VW Beetle TDI '05 Jeep Liberty CRD '89 Toyota 4x4, needs 2L-T '78 280Z with L28ET - 12.86@110 Oil Burner Kartel #35 http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b1...oD/bioclip.jpg |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
this is total crap, dont do it.
__________________
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? As long as they would add one additional commandment for you to keep thy religion to thyself. George Carlin (Wonder where he is now..) 1981 240d (engine donor 1983 240d) recently rebuilt engine hurray! - No more.. fought a tree and the tree won. pearl black 1983 240d 4speed (Converted!@$$%) atleast the tranny was rebuilt. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
You're right Ruben. For some reason the 87 190DT had the slots in the fender, the 2.5T in the 124 got slots, but the 3.0T got none.
I'd like to install a slotted fender in my '87, but haven't gotten motivated enough to buy a new one, so as soon as a reasonably priced used one shows up I'll have it painted and install it. I'm not sure it needs it, the stock '87 setup seems to get plenty of air through the fender without the concerns of a big splash on the right hydrolocking my engine, but it has that purposeful look.
__________________
![]() Gone to the dark side - Jeff |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Beware - controversial views below
Although this flies in the face of conventional wisdom on this and many other mortoring web sites, taking intake air from behind the radiator is not IMO an entirely stupid thing to do.
When you are sludging around town, the air behind the radiator will be quite a bit hotter than in front. The engine isn't being used to make a lot of power, and the hot air improves the engine's efficiency. When you are motoring on the open road, the air blasting through the radiator doesn't actually become that much hotter, and so, the power loss is minimal. If you want a car for out and out power, or drag strip potential, it isn't an older diesel engined MB. It's a bit like asking someone like dame Kiri te Kanawa to sing with the Spice Girls. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
What study did you get that from?
Cold air is more efficient because the denser air makes the fuel burn more cleanly and extracts more energy from the burning process. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|