Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-21-2010, 04:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 436
Anyone de-stroke a 3.5 l S-class? Makes a 3.2L

Just wondering if anyone here has this experience!



Michael

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-21-2010, 04:36 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,097
Explain how that would work. Reducing the stroke would also dramatically lower compression levels, and the engine would likely not even run.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 83k - mine - (OC-85,500)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 13k - wifes (OC-17k)
'01 E320 Wagon - 159k - mine (OC-160,000)
'01 E320 - 179k - dad's (OC-182,500)
'07 E350 Wagon - 131k - dad's (OC-132,500)
'01 SL500 - 51k - dad's (OC-52,000)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 57k - Brothers (OC-64,000)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-21-2010, 04:39 PM
JEBalles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Carlisle, MA
Posts: 1,225
longer pistons? what's the point? (I know nothing about this subject)
__________________
1983 240D 3.0T 4-speed manual, now sold

1989 Subaru GL Wagon 5-speed Touring Edition
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-21-2010, 04:51 PM
JimmyL's Avatar
Rogue T Intolerant!!!
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sunnyvale, Texas (DFW)
Posts: 9,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by samiam44 View Post
Anyone de-stroke a 3.5 l S-class? Makes a 3.2L
Sure. Twice last week.......
__________________
Jimmy L.
'05 Acura TL 6MT
2001 ML430 My Spare

Gone:
'95 E300 188K "Batmobile" Texas Unfriendly Black
'85 300TD 235K "The Wagon" Texas Friendly White
'80 240D 154K "China" Scar engine installed
'81 300TD 240K "Smash"
'80 240D 230K "The Squash"
'81 240D 293K"Scar" Rear ended harder than Elton John
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-21-2010, 06:25 PM
DeliveryValve's Avatar
Chairman of my Benz
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central California
Posts: 4,132
That would be like putting a 2mm oversized piston in a 3.0L 603 block.



On a side note, I think a 3.5L 603.970/1 crank with a 3.0L 603.961 rods (installed either the 3.0 or 3.5 block) would make a pretty good torque motor. Theoretically using this combo will alter the rod/stroke causing the piston to remain at top dead center longer creating more torque. But all this would work if you can make customs pistons for the correct compression ratio and won't burn up.









.
__________________
1983 123.133 California
- GreaseCar Veg System


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-21-2010, 08:15 PM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,767
Shortening the stroke will not change the TDC time, still making a circle on the C-rod end.

As far as torque, should reduce torque as the lever arm is decreased. However, typically better for high RPM.
__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-21-2010, 10:14 PM
compu_85's Avatar
Waiting for his Model 3..
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Springfield VA
Posts: 5,174
The extra torque of the 3.5l is very nice, I wouldn't want to lessen it. When working correctly the 603.97 is a very nice driver.

-Jason
__________________
1991 350SDL. 230,000 miles (new motor @ 150,000).

2013 Fiat 500E. 20,000 miles, 80 miles at a time.
2012 Passat TDI. 95,000 miles. More space, power, and fuel economy than the Benz
2004 Touareg V10 TDI. 150,000 miles. One of 450.
1999 Jetta TDI. 310,000 miles.
1992 Jetta ECOdiesel. 156,000 miles. 1 of 48. Sold.
1991 Jetta ECOdiesel. 430,000 miles. 1 of 700. Sold to VeeDubTDI, totaled in front of our house
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-23-2010, 01:47 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 436
Well,

Yes if you put 3.0 crank in it- you put 3.0 l rods in it too. Thought that would be obvious. The reason is the 3.5's have reliability problems because of the bore/stroke ratio. Factory for a time had beefed up rods and pistons.

M

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2018 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page