Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old 07-12-2015, 01:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 28
My W115 71 220D where the engine is actually a 1973 220D has a camshaft # that was not listed in the manual too. It might have been a #18 as well. I was trying to make sure it has the correct camshaft for the valve rocker arms and nuts (soft vs hardened), but never was able to figure it out.

On the chain situation, when I had the engine apart, I closely inspected my chain and saw 2 tiny metal shavings embedded in the chain links and preventing the chain from swiveling the way it should in two spots, so I had to replace it. If it hadn't been damaged, I would have reused it with an offset key (about 6 deg. stretch).
Against everyone's recommendation, I decided to use the beck/arnley chain. The reasons (not necessary in order of importance):
1. It is a continuous chain and doesn't have to be crimped (obviously it can only be installed with the crankshaft and all guides out of the block).
2. It is made in Japan.
3. It costs $45 shipped.

The IWIS chain may be better, but it costs $120, the crimp tool is very expensive and there is the chance that you might not crimp it correctly.

That is why I would vote for using an offset key unless you are doing a full rebuild, but that's just me

Now a question for you - You said "I've adjusted the IP and linkage to compensate for the lower air density here."
can you elaborate on that?
I am in Salt Lake City (4400 feet altitude) and I get gray smoke when first taking off in 1st and halfway trough second, and through 3rd and 4th I see some black smoke when accelerating. My diaphragm spring had 2 thick and 1 thin shim, I removed the 2 thick shims and the smoke seems much less - I assume that the same amount of vacuum will now be able to pull the rod a little more toward less fuel. What else is there to be adjusted? And what about the ip linkage? Maybe the tickler shaft engagement - it is half ball length right now (per FSM), maybe increase it to full ball's length so that at idle and low throttle, the tickler is slightly more pulled back and applies less fuel?
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page