Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 12-08-2004, 10:11 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
Reminds me of what the geniuses used to say about Reagan. Remember when he was 'simplistic' and all those other terms of intellectual condescension? It shouldn't take long to find all the clever Op/Ed pieces by those luminaries of the left. In twenty years, they forget what they said of him and recall how he reached across the aisle. Riiight.
None of which proves a thing about W.

Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 12-08-2004, 10:14 AM
MedMech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Let me ask you guys, how many of you are smart enough to rally the support to become president?
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 12-08-2004, 10:37 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by MedMech
Let me ask you guys, how many of you are smart enough to rally the support to become president?
Not me. When it comes to politics, no one operates at a higher level than W. He definitely has me beat there. On the other hand, I am able to put together as many as two coherent sentences of original thought without help from Karl.

My guess, and that's all it is, is that W is of average intelligence. The problem is that his occupation calls for higher than average intelligence, so he often looks like a knucklehead.

Mediocre intellectual ability is probably the least of W's problems. The real reasons he has failed at so many things are his arrogance, his lack of curiosity, and his lack of a moral compass.

I got a Bushism of the Day calendar for Christmas '03. Here is the Bushism for December 3:

"One of the interesting initiatives we've taken in Washington, D.C., is we've got these vampire-busting devices. A vampire is a - cell deal you can plug in the wall to charge your cell phone." Denver; August 14, 2001.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 12-08-2004, 01:48 PM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
dculkin
I believe you are guilty of some wishful thinking. re: Bush being only of average intelligence. I remember near the end of the recent campaign that some reporter asked Kerry to comment on the fact that Bush had higher intelligence scores on his military testing than did the--oh, so smart---John Kerry. Don't fall into the trap of thinking that people with whom you agree are smart, while with whom you disagree are stupid.
As to his being articulate--well thats a bit different than intelligence. I hate to listen to him because he is not so articulate. People I know who were born and raised in Texas, say thats just the way they talk. I don't know.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 12-08-2004, 02:24 PM
savas's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by MedMech
Let me ask you guys, how many of you are smart enough to rally the support to become president?
Do you really HAVE to be smart to become president? I think you need to be motivated, very wealthy and be well connected or come from a well connected family. It takes some talent and charm to network and make connections if your family didn't do it for you but I don't think you need to be a genius. I think, like many things in life, with motivation and money you can get a lot of things done and succeed even if you are not the smartest and the brightest or even close.
__________________
I'd rather argue against a hundred idiots, than have one agree with me. — Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 12-08-2004, 02:32 PM
KirkVining's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by MedMech
Elected to President of the United States at 54, re-elected @ 58 Yale Grad, fighter pilot.

Yea he's an idiot, but lets not tell him until '08 Ok guys.
got us into Iraq quagmire @ 56
failed to catch bin laden
mismanaged economy
responsible for greatest drop in the value of the dollar in history
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 12-08-2004, 02:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler
...Don't fall into the trap of thinking that people with whom you agree are smart, while with whom you disagree are stupid.
I don't think I have fallen into that trap with respect to W. There are plenty of people with whom I disagree who are clearly not stupid. Antonin Scalia, for example. I don't think W is dumb because he disagrees with me, I just see a lot of evidence that he is dumb.

Quote:
As to his being articulate--well thats a bit different than intelligence...
No doubt about it.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 12-08-2004, 02:35 PM
KirkVining's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin
Not me. When it comes to politics, no one operates at a higher level than W. He definitely has me beat there. On the other hand, I am able to put together as many as two coherent sentences of original thought without help from Karl.

My guess, and that's all it is, is that W is of average intelligence. The problem is that his occupation calls for higher than average intelligence, so he often looks like a knucklehead.

Mediocre intellectual ability is probably the least of W's problems. The real reasons he has failed at so many things are his arrogance, his lack of curiosity, and his lack of a moral compass.

I got a Bushism of the Day calendar for Christmas '03. Here is the Bushism for December 3:

"One of the interesting initiatives we've taken in Washington, D.C., is we've got these vampire-busting devices. A vampire is a - cell deal you can plug in the wall to charge your cell phone." Denver; August 14, 2001.
"The past is over"
"The problem in Iraq is that it was a catastrophic success"
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 12-08-2004, 02:43 PM
KirkVining's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler
At this point, there are only three options, as I see it; There may be some tweaking on these points but basically its these 3.
1) Cut and run---just leave. Declare victory and leave. From the point of view of US prestige around the world, I think this is an absolute loser. No one will believe us when we say how determined we are.
2) Finish the job, then leave. The Bush plan. The tough part is determing when its OK to leave. Its that judgment thing again---When is Iraq stable enough to justify the cost to that point and allow us to leave with most of our prestige intact.
3) Never leave. the Imperial US. We just stay and establish bases in each country as we conquer it. Use ancient Rome as the model. Very distasteful to me, personally.

By the way, not everyone who supported the president in the recent election is pleased with war--but could not support a person like Kerry.
I will guarantee you the plan has always been #3. #2, what you call "The Bush Plan" is nothing more than cover story for this. But it will never work. There are a billion Muslims on this planet. Just that fact alone will assure a never ending supply of terrorists, jihadists, Baathists and suicide bombers endlessly being sucked into the sewer drain of Iraq, and an endless supply of hatred and anti-American propaganda being exported out to the rest of the world, and an endless supply of dead and wounded being exported back to America. This thing is now forever imprinted in the world's mind as act of criminal aggression on our part, and we will forever be the bad guys. It has ruined our image in the world, and this nazi, fascist approach to solving our problems will cost us dearly. It is a mistake of massive proportions.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 12-08-2004, 05:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Charlotte, NCizzle
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by shane
"But he tried to kill my daddy!" Favorite line of mine said by reigning POTUS. Hitler analogy is extreme but relevent. A man like Bush who evaded genuine military duty, failed consistently in business, is an alcholic and recovered dope fiend, and was saved by a televangelist preacher, now runs the country that granted him extra powerful powers to deal with the creators of 911. With that power this guy goes to war under proven and false reasons. Hell the UN did not even back him. All this for an attempt on daddy. Now if this doesn't sound ruthless I don't know what does.
one request. Instead of blaming it on bush, blame it on his cabinet. He did not know there were not wmd's over there. He was misinformed. He has not denied that they havnt found any wmd's.

edit* i hope u dont thinkl he is still an alcoholic. Watch "Journeys with george"
__________________
1993 400e
Charlotte
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 12-08-2004, 07:32 PM
MedMech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilvanakis
Do you really HAVE to be smart to become president? I think you need to be motivated, very wealthy and be well connected or come from a well connected family. It takes some talent and charm to network and make connections if your family didn't do it for you but I don't think you need to be a genius. I think, like many things in life, with motivation and money you can get a lot of things done and succeed even if you are not the smartest and the brightest or even close.
Kerry had more money and better connections BUT
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 12-08-2004, 07:46 PM
shane's Avatar
nevermind
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 469
Bush is to blame, as he has the power to stop or begin most anything his cabinet wants. That is why it is HIS cabinet. Now we all know that Bush is a puppet for the republicans. So seeing that he is the co-conspirator figure head of a corrupt and greedy gov't why not rag on him. Plus he is such an easy target for ridicule. The true power underneath him are just mean, greedy, old men with much better than average intelligence, that justify their selfish means by thinking they deserve whatever they get because the public is too stupid to realize the truth. Unfortunately they appear to be right. The real victim in all of this is the majority of the population.

Now cut the crap about me being a Clinton supporter. I never was. But the level of corruption (which was always present) has achieved a scary new plateau unknown to me in my brief 34 years. And only about half of the population are interested enough about this to research it. Sad.
__________________
The only thing we have to fear is fear itself!
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 12-08-2004, 09:34 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin
None of which proves a thing about W.
Didn't mean to imply a thing about the current guy. Meant to imply all sorts of insults about folks who diss'd ol' Ronnie as a mental dwarf and such.

It amuses me that folks take such wonderful pleasure in talking-up Mr Bush's intellectual shortcomings. I cannot imagine that making me feel any better about losing a contest. I mean, if I lose at something, I prefer to believe my opponent is the planetary best and got lucky.

"Hey everybody, I lost the election to a dumbass. Not only that, the people who did vote for him are all religious zealots, bigots, stupid, or Nazis."

No wonder ya lost. Pass me the bong when you're done. I want some a' dat $hit, too.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 12-08-2004, 10:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Charlotte, NCizzle
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by MedMech
Kerry had more money and better connections BUT
not true at all. Bush's campaign raised more money this campaign than any previous presidential campaign. Hes the one that adapted the fastest to mccain feingold
__________________
1993 400e
Charlotte
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 12-08-2004, 10:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Charlotte, NCizzle
Posts: 238
shane i absolutely agree with your statement about the corruption. it just seems like its becoming more apparent these days. What it comes down to is money. Whoever raises the most wins. Sad it works this way but thats what it has come to. Seems like candidates are appealing more to what the majority of the people want to hear as opposed to what they really beleive or think is right all because of political ads. Everything is done to get votes. I dont think its always been like that. I dont agree with bush with everything he stands for at all. Im pro choice, and im against a constitutional amendment that defines marriage between a man and woman (i dont agree with gay marriage but beleive it is the states right to decide). I just looked at wheere the country was, who was running, and decided bush would be the best man to keep our country running strong.

hows that coming from a high school senior

__________________
1993 400e
Charlotte
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page