Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 05-19-2009, 01:41 PM
Stressed Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Florida Big Bend region
Posts: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fulcrum525 View Post
Land Rover Discovery Td5-
Economy: 34.4mpg extra urban, 30.1mpg combined
0-60mph: 14.2 seconds (Slow; but still faster then a 240d with a lot more weight to push around)
Are those numbers from a U.K. source?
Is that 34.4 miles per imperial gallon? Or U.S. gallon?

I'm not busting on you, just pointing out that a gallon isn't always a gallon. The ones in the UK are about 20% larger than the ones in the U.S., so it helps to know which one someone is using when calculating MPG.

Before somebody else in this thread gives me an earful: Yes, I too would really like to see a larger variety of modern diesel engines available in passenger cars and light trucks in the U.S. I have (wisely) never held my breath waiting for them.

Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 05-19-2009, 01:44 PM
Stressed Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Florida Big Bend region
Posts: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmash View Post
4500 lb SUV? The E300 weighs about 4500 lb's so whats the big deal?
Is that 4500 lb the normal "curb weight" people often use when comparing vehicles?

I would think that you would have to add a substantial load of passengers and luggage to come up with that number for a W124 E300.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 05-19-2009, 01:51 PM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulC View Post
P.S. Wait until the Sierra Club fleebs see the consequences of the increased harvesting and burning of coal needed to stoke our electric powerplants to charge up what relatively few full-electric vehicles will be on line in the next 10 years.
Who says they have to emit anything? Being one who works in the refinery business, I can tell you that anything that comes out of a smokestack can be refined into something else instead, it's all just a matter of money. People who own fuel-inefficient cars should pay taxes to help pay for it, at this point it has become a matter of national security, and perhaps even the end of the species.

Last edited by JollyRoger; 05-19-2009 at 02:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 05-19-2009, 02:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 275
One bit of extra weight that can be eliminated are the electronic stability controls. Then people will be forced to drive a little better.
__________________
1984 300TD
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 05-19-2009, 02:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: St. Thomas PA
Posts: 957
Hatterasguy has the right idea with the taxes, provided the revenue is used for a worthwhile purpose as opposed to more "nation building". It is the easiest way to modify peoples' behavior without all this fuel economy legislation. This idea doesn't seem to be hurting the Europeans too badly- that's why they have all the fuel-efficient cars that they do.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 05-19-2009, 02:41 PM
SwampYankee's Avatar
New England Hick
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 1,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by pawoSD View Post
I'd drive one!
Actually I would, too. Assuming I could squeeze my fat @$$ into it.
__________________

1980 300TD-China Blue/Blue MBTex-2nd Owner, 107K (Alt Blau) OBK #15
'06 Chevy Tahoe Z71 (for the wife & 4 kids, current mule) '03 Honda Odyssey (son #1's ride, reluctantly) '99 GMC Suburban (255K+ miles, semi-retired mule) 21' SeaRay Seville (summer escape pod)
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 05-19-2009, 03:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by tankdriver View Post
One bit of extra weight that can be eliminated are the electronic stability controls. Then people will be forced to drive a little better.
Seat belts, airbags, ABS systems...let's cut the fat and return to the essence of the automotive experience circa 1946. Just don't hit a random squirrel crossing the roadway, else you smite the metal dashboard and the non-safety glass windshield.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 05-19-2009, 03:19 PM
TheDon's Avatar
Ghost of Diesels Past
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmash View Post
4500 lb SUV? The E300 weighs about 4500 lb's so whats the big deal?

It's time to start saving fuel. We cannot have everything we want.
thats GVW... the SDL weighs like 3700 lbs with a GVW of 4k... IIRC anything over 4999 GVW requires a CDL or certain endorsment
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 05-19-2009, 03:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fulcrum525 View Post
Land Rover Discovery Td5-
Economy: 34.4mpg extra urban, 30.1mpg combined
0-60mph: 14.2 seconds (Slow; but still faster then a 240d with a lot more weight to push around)


That is just one example out of many. (ok so the tailpipe doesn't smell like daffodils but I've never minded the smell of passanger car diesels)
As an added health benefit, 0 to 60 in 14.2 seconds will help tone flabby spinchter muscles as you try to merge into 70 mph freeway traffic from a short, hilly entrance ramp.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 05-19-2009, 04:10 PM
Stressed Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Florida Big Bend region
Posts: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDon View Post
thats GVW... the SDL weighs like 3700 lbs with a GVW of 4k... IIRC anything over 4999 GVW requires a CDL or certain endorsment
In Florida? Go look it up, grasshopper!
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 05-19-2009, 06:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
I don't see the big deal either. My 2004 Jetta weighs 3000 lbs and easily gets 45 mpg. And the older ones get even better mileage because they have less power. Anyone who insists cars can't get 35 mpg 7 years from now must be smoking something. Heck, even the auto industry is going along with it this time, so what's the problem?
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 05-19-2009, 06:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmash View Post
4500 lb SUV? The E300 weighs about 4500 lb's so whats the big deal?

It's time to start saving fuel. We cannot have everything we want.
Your E300 doesn't weigh 4500 lbs (that's the gross, not curb weight), but I agree with what you're saying. Even some of the smaller hybrid SUV's are already pushing over 30 mpg today. This is highly doable. I think what PaulC is protesting is the idea of saying goodbye to oversized poopboxes like the Hummer H2.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 05-19-2009, 07:19 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by Txjake View Post
you are absolutely smoking crack...a sustained fuel rate of $4-5 a gallon would wreck this economy more than it already is. The price of everything will go waaay up...and the end user (us) will pay for it


I never said we should do it, but I assume you had a little eco in college? Supply and demand, you need to raise the price to the point where other technoligy becomes affordable.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 05-19-2009, 07:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
How much you want to bet all the car manufactures fall way short of this and simply negotiate a reduction so its hardly meaningful?

People want their cake with no pain. If you want high mileage cars, and to reduce emissions etc, you need to raise the price of gas. As we saw last summer the breaking point is $4-$5 a gallon. The goverment can do this with taxes, and while it would be painful short term, long term it would probably be better.
I've always liked that idea, especially if the tax was used strictly to pay down the national debt. But I'm afraid it's a political non-starter.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 05-19-2009, 07:27 PM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
I never said we should do it, but I assume you had a little eco in college? Supply and demand, you need to raise the price to the point where other technoligy becomes affordable.
Never assume, you'd probably be wrong. Seems like Europe pays way more than we do, and have generally higher mpg for their vehicles......hm.....might be on to something here....

__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page