Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 10-31-2009, 09:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,869
Does anyone have a link to the current rules? I got pretty familiar with the OTR truck driving hours when I was going for a CDL, but I know nothing about the aviation rules.

__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles.
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 10-31-2009, 09:32 PM
Pooka
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 664
Skippy...

I just heard a story that the OTR the road rules changed today. The number of hours a driver can do in a day just went from 11 to 10. I am sure there is more to it that that but that is all I heard.

Something to do with trying to reduce driver fatuge.
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 10-31-2009, 10:01 PM
Pooka
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 664
For FAA regs you can go to www.FAA.gov.

There is a search area there. I typed in 'sleeping during a flight' and found a Word document on Pilot sleeping recommendations from the FAA that I bet every airline management person is going to find waiting on their desk come Monday morning.

Or at least they should if they are really worried about the problem of Pilots sleeping during a flight. Turns out the FAA identified this problem long ago, did a study on it, presented a number of practical solutions, and.....

Yeah, looks like the airlines are really eager to take them up on their suggestions.
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 10-31-2009, 10:27 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pooka View Post
According to what I just saw on the NBC news the FAA is working on that now. Airline scheduling is getting a close look as well as the management since they are the ones who decide how much time a Pilot has off before they are scheduled to operate again. Looks like the whole 'fatgue' thing is about to be pushed to the fore no matter what the industry wants.

It's about time.

By the way... I can assure you the DOT looks at the question of 'intent' very, well, intently before they rule on any decision. When they are trying to reconstruct events the main question they have of an operator is 'why did you do that?'

Often the answer makes sense even if it is wrong, a flaw in thinking is spotted, and this goes into the way new rules are written for the operation of transportation systems.
You are aware that these two work as pilots for a commercial air carrier and, under their current regulations, they cannot fly more than 80 hours per month? Do you still wish to defend their actions due to excessive workload posed by their employer?

Don't believe every single thing you hear on NBC news. If it's related to aviation, you can bet your life savings that they don't have a clue what the hell they are talking about.

I can assure you that the DOT won't matter in the slightest.........the two pilots lost their tickets to fly........courtesy of the FAA.

There was no "flaw" in the operation of that aircraft..........the only "flaw" was two pilots who happened to doze off at the same time.
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 10-31-2009, 10:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,869
Thanks. I found what I was looking for in FAR 121. The basic breakdown of 1000 hrs in a year, 100 in a month, 30 in any seven days, and 8 hours in one shot is pretty simple, and doesn't seem like many hours. The part about required rest periods is a bit confusing to say the least.

For comparison, the FMCSA guide located here: http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/truck/driver/hos/fmcsa-guide-to-hos.pdf

allows up to 11 consecutive hours of driving and up to 14 consecutive hours on duty. It also has a limit of 60 hours on duty in a seven day period or 70 hours in an eight day period. This can theoretically be all driving time but usually includes some other duties (pre-trips, waiting to get loaded/unloaded, etc). I've known quite a few drivers who fudged the books in order to do even more than what is allowed under the regs.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles.
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 10-31-2009, 10:38 PM
WVOtoGO's Avatar
Up & Over
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Usually, in the skies above you.
Posts: 151
Brian -
Perhaps you could post what I just emailed you.

As for other statements being made here. I have to wonder how many flight hours they have in the cockpit.
What people tend to or seem to think is going on, as well as what they think should and or could go on, are so far from reality some times it makes me laugh.
__________________
1980 300D - Veggie Burner !
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 10-31-2009, 10:57 PM
WVOtoGO's Avatar
Up & Over
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Usually, in the skies above you.
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
BS.

They may have had no intent to fall asleep at the controls.........and it just happened........similar to you driving a vehicle and nodding off.

They most certainly are at fault........and you'd be at fault as well when your vehicle piles into a tree.

Just who's to blame if these two are not "at fault"?
X2
100%

And...
Who the heck said they both had to have passed out or fell asleep at the same time ??

And who cares how many hours they are allowed to fly in any given time period.

If the two of them didn’t get a good nights rest the night before. One of them could have intentionally (and stated to the other they were going to do so) leaned back for a short nap. (Anyone who doesn’t think this happens is….)

The other has no issue with it at the time. But then finds himself dosing off as well. Not too common, but it sure can (and has) happened before.

Does someone really believe that the two pilots would both acknowledge that they were going to both “rest their eyes” during a flight, and thus turn the radio up?!

In all my flight hours, I can not remember one time when it was though as a good idea to turn the radio volume up in case we both feel asleep. (Much less do so because you both plan to rest your eyes.) If it were possible that we'd both fall asleep, and either of us knew it were possible. We’d be having a face slapping contest for the duration of the flight.
__________________
1980 300D - Veggie Burner !
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 10-31-2009, 11:49 PM
Pooka
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 664
Well, it's good to know that the nations airways are as well managed as they are.

I guess I should not be commenting on commercial air flight as I have not been on a commercial aircraft since the early 1980's. The oil company I worked for had a policy of no commercial flights for people above a specific level. We had our own jets not for any kind of perk. It was just considered safer than flying commercial.

I'm retired now and I never intend to fly again.

It will be interesting to see if the FAA lets this incident slide or if it moves to makes changes in the way personnel are scheduled for the airlines. According to the FAA's own figures over 250 passangers have been killed since 1991 due to accidents in which Pilot fatgue was a contributing factor.

I'm glad I don't have to solve these problems anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 11-01-2009, 12:12 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,869
250 since 1991 works out to some seriously good odds. I'm sure the number of people killed in privately owned car crashes due to the same cause is several orders of magnitude higher than that.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles.
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 11-02-2009, 08:32 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by WVOtoGO View Post

The other has no issue with it at the time. But then finds himself dosing off as well. Not too common, but it sure can (and has) happened before.
There is a small "window of opportunity" where the second pilot can realize that he's also in danger of falling asleep. The responsible thing to do, at that moment, is to wake the first pilot and explain the situation...........and, as you suggested.........get into some face slapping or other diversion for the remainder of the flight.
Reply With Quote
  #131  
Old 11-02-2009, 10:30 AM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
There is a small "window of opportunity" where the second pilot can realize that he's also in danger of falling asleep. The responsible thing to do, at that moment, is to wake the first pilot and explain the situation...........and, as you suggested.........get into some face slapping or other diversion for the remainder of the flight.
That is the part that strikes me as weird. This is like you having 2 engines on your boat and BOTH fail at the same time. One pilot falling asleep, sure. BOTH at the same time? What are the odds?
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 11-02-2009, 10:48 AM
Mistress's Avatar
No crying in baseball
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Inside a vortex
Posts: 626
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
BS.

They may have had no intent to fall asleep at the controls.........and it just happened........similar to you driving a vehicle and nodding off.

They most certainly are at fault........and you'd be at fault as well when your vehicle piles into a tree.

Just who's to blame if these two are not "at fault"?
auto pilot? Maybe that was asleep too.
__________________
"It's normal for these things to empty your wallet and break your heart in the process."
2012 SLK 350
1987 420 SEL
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 11-02-2009, 10:49 AM
Mistress's Avatar
No crying in baseball
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Inside a vortex
Posts: 626
Quote:
Originally Posted by aklim View Post
That is the part that strikes me as weird. This is like you having 2 engines on your boat and BOTH fail at the same time. One pilot falling asleep, sure. BOTH at the same time? What are the odds?
Funny thing you should mention that. My step-father was flying a C130 in Nam and guess what? All three pilots dozed off and woke up after hearing the altitude alarm go off at 2500 feet.....not a dry seat in house...
__________________
"It's normal for these things to empty your wallet and break your heart in the process."
2012 SLK 350
1987 420 SEL
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 11-02-2009, 10:52 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mistress View Post
auto pilot? Maybe that was asleep too.
The autopilot would be perfectly happy to hold FL370 until the aircraft ran out of fuel. It never sleeps.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page