Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-28-2010, 10:11 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfloriII View Post
Great point!! Why do we have to get insurance through employers?? If it were based on individual people making the purchases themselves costs would go way down. We buy every other kind of insurance ourselves.... why not health insurance?
I've bought my own health insurance in the past, it's avaiable if you want to buy it. Most employers offer it as a benifit to attract quality employees. The last time I bought my own, the premiums were around $15k per year for a familly of four. My wife's plan, through her employer, is only a fraction of the cost because it's subsidized.

Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-29-2010, 10:20 PM
Pooka
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 664
Waxman wants to speak to the executives about the costs they are quoting since many reports state that the companies are planning on taking the charges this year and that this is how much it is going to cost the companies this year.

The change that is going to cost the companies so much this year does not take effect until 2013. Waxman wants to know what charges they are talking about.

Bohener has said the companies should not have to answer to any committie. Waxman said that is up to them, but if they are going to take a charge such as this now when they are not entitled to it until 2013 he would like to know why.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-29-2010, 10:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by 450slcguy View Post
Ooh a misplaced word, how silly of me.
Fret not, as the SRJ fine for sullying the English language in this way is a mere "$100,000,000.00 million dollars".
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-30-2010, 11:21 AM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by guage View Post
Who do you suppose is going to pay in the end?


By DAVID REILLY, ELLEN E. SCHULTZ And RON WINSLOW

AT&T Inc. said it would take a $1 billion charge against earnings tied to the federal health-care overhaul, joining a number of other companies in reporting an impact from the bill signed into law this week.

The charges relate to prescription-drug benefits for retirees. Companies that provide this benefit, as AT&T does, receive a federal subsidy, plus they can deduct the value of this subsidy from their taxes. The health overhaul cancels the deductibility of the subsidy.

It is for that reason that companies are taking a charge against earnings. They "have a stream of tax benefits that they are losing way out into the future," said Roland McDevitt, director of health-care research at benefits consultant Towers Watson.

On Friday, 3M Co. joined AT&T in saying it would take a first-quarter charge, in 3M's case of $85 million to $90 million. Deere & Co., Caterpillar Inc. and AK Steel Holding Corp. also said they were taking such charges.

AT&T's is much larger than the others' because it has far more current and future retirees, and a large number of them are unionized, with guaranteed benefits.

The charges are "noncash," meaning companies don't have to write a check. But ultimately their tax bills will be higher given the change in tax treatment of the drug-benefit subsidy.

The charges are related to a 2003 law providing a prescription-drug benefit under Medicare. At the time it was adopted, some companies were threatening to drop drug coverage for their retirees, since this would now be available through Medicare. Congress voted them a 28% tax-free subsidy for continuing to provide coverage to retirees eligible for Medicare.

The subsidies caused the cost of companies' obligations for retiree benefits to decline. AT&T, for example, saw its obligation drop by $1.6 billion at the time.

The cost of providing retiree prescription-drug coverage was already tax-deductible before the 2003 law. After that law was signed, companies remained able to deduct the cost of providing the benefit, including the portion paid for by the subsidy.

The current health-care overhaul doesn't eliminate the subsidy, nor make it taxable. What it changes is that companies will no longer be able to deduct the portion of the drug benefit paid for by the subsidy.

Since companies had created an asset based on the expectation they would be getting these deductions over the lives of their current and future retirees, they say they need to take a charge reflecting the fall in the asset's value.

Accounting rules say the charges, which affect what are called "deferred tax assets," must be taken in the quarter in which a tax-law change is enacted. The first quarter ends Wednesday. Companies wouldn't have to announce the charges before they actually report their first-quarter earnings over the next several weeks. However, if they viewed the charges as material, they might feel they needed to inform shareholders immediately.

The one-time charges, running into the hundreds of millions of dollars, could add to the ongoing debate about the health overhaul's impact, even though the charges are noncash.

Mr. Zion of Credit Suisse estimated in a report this week that companies in the S&P 500 index will rack up a combined $4.5 billion charge due to the change in the value of the tax asset.
—Roger Cheng contributed to this article.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704100604575145981713658608.html
Excuse me, but this article says ATT not going to be getting free money from Uncle Sugar anymore. Perhaps you can explain how this is a bad thing ? And thanks for posting something showing how Healthcare Reform is going to cut the deficit.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-30-2010, 11:22 AM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by raslaje View Post
Exactly right. AT&T and every other employer with health benefits just passes the cost on to the customer. Let everybody get their own insurance. I just bet most of the people in favor of this bill had their insurance paid by their employer's customers.
How exactly does a company "pass the cost onto the customer" when they just took a big writedown ? Take an accounting class. Costs can be passed on if competition is doing the same thing. Does Verizon have a big population of union retirees going back to DOBs in the 1910's? getting fat pensions? I think not. So, ATT, sure, they can raise prices, but I can get a phone somewhere else now. My guess is they will mitigate this by doing just what they originally threatened to do, move their retirees onto the Bush Plan.

Last edited by JollyRoger; 03-30-2010 at 11:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-30-2010, 11:23 AM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by guage View Post
Raise the cost of product or service to pay the offset. Or let go some employees.
Ah, excuse me, but you missed the "retirees" part. That is who this applies too. Perhaps they could just put them on Medicare like everyone else?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-30-2010, 11:25 AM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by 450slcguy View Post
Well so far Rush Limbaugh, Skid Row, and AustinCE have indicated there getting ready to leave. Obviously they don't believe in our system of government and have a better place in mind. Good for them, good riddance and lots of luck in their new country.
I hear that Somalia and Yemen have no national healthcare. All the nice places are out.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-30-2010, 11:26 AM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig View Post
Actually, it sounds like they were given a "bribe" in 2003 to continue to provide drug benefits to their union retirees and the new bill has taken it away. I assume they will now get rid of that benefit in their next union contract.

The good news is that mandatory health coverage will make unions even less relevant and level the playing field for non-union workers. It also means that part of my phone bill will not be going to pay these union benefits.
It doesn't apply to current employees, it applies to their retirees. They have sugary health care plans, and Big Business got a big fat sugar plum from the Republican Congress in 2003 so that their retirees would not get all pissy over being kicked off their sugary prescription drug plans onto Bush's crummy Medicare Prescription Drug plan, which would cost the GOP precious Florida votes in the 2004 election. Obama has ended this massive bribe, saving the taxpayer billions. And now it's spin time for the Death Panel Right. Logic and facts, they're a hell of a drug.

Last edited by JollyRoger; 03-30-2010 at 11:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-30-2010, 11:40 AM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe View Post
After the vote, Al Sharpton makes the statement that "Americans overwhelmingly voted for socialism when they elected President Obama." as well as the statement "This began the transformation of the country that the President promised when he was elected"
Al Sharpton is a government official? Why should I give a rat's rear what he says? Why is what he says so important to you?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-30-2010, 02:03 PM
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,470
Quote:
Originally Posted by JollyRoger View Post
Al Sharpton is a government official? Why should I give a rat's rear what he says? Why is what he says so important to you?
Strawman arguement alert.....
__________________
'06 E320 CDI
'17 Corvette Stingray Vert
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-30-2010, 02:05 PM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe View Post
Correct.

Count on both happening.

For examples:
Just yesterday, Caterpillar and Deere and Company both reported increases of $100,000,000.00 million dollars in increased healthcare-related costs each.....and that is for just the remainder of this year - 2010!!!

In the months ahead as Capitalism continues crumbling, and unemployment rises - I predict that Obama and the 50.5% of Congress that voted government medicine in will proclaim that Capitalism doesn't work. I told you so here.
This thread is hilarious. Here we have the righties blatantly defending corporate welfare. Boo hoo, I'm all broke up over these guys and their customers having to pay more instead of ripping off the taxpayer. Sniff, sniff, get me a hanky! Poor old Caterpiller should be getting $100,000,000 from the taxpayer, those poor, poor corporations! How dare Obama take it away and give it to sick people!
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-30-2010, 10:31 PM
guage's Avatar
PEEKABOO I SEE YOU
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,899
Maybe a different country will give them a better incentive to mfg there!
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-30-2010, 10:51 PM
TylerH860's Avatar
KHAAAAAAN-gress
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 5,187
They are going to have the same healthy bottom line no matter what. To assume they will just eat the cost shows ignorance of the system. Having an extra hundred million dollar burden, even if it seems silly they got it in the first place, will have consequences on average Americans. Their only option now is to cut back or pass the costs off to the consumer. Neither pan out well for us.

That is the crux of this whole welfare and entitlement system.
__________________
1985 500SL Euro w/ AMG bits 130k
1984 300SD Turbodiesel 192k
1980 240D Stick China 188k
2001 CLK55 AMG 101k
2007 S600 Biturbo 149k Overheated Project, IT'S ALIVE!!!
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-30-2010, 11:30 PM
Chris Bell's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by guage View Post
Maybe a different country will give them a better incentive to mfg there!
And then we'll all set around and lament the loss middle class manufacturing jobs.
But hey..we got our entitlement program, lifes good.

__________________
I'm sick of .sig files
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page