Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-02-2002, 10:34 PM
Chicagoland
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question Who makes the best used SUV for under $10K? Range Rover? Land Cruiser? Other?

Who makes the best used SUV for under $10K?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-03-2002, 12:32 AM
mbz380se
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'd look at a 1990-1995 Toyota 4-Runner. Head gaskets on the V-6 engines are the big issues with these trucks, so make sure they have been done.

The Jeep Grand Cherokee is also a credible alternative, especially if one gets the 4.0 liter Inline-6 and Selec-Trac full-time 4wd (the most reliable combination).

-Sam
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-03-2002, 12:51 AM
Clauser1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
New or pre owned?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-03-2002, 05:23 AM
Ashman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 4,749
Toyota Landcruiser would be a good bet if you can find a fairly new model.

Nissan Pathfinders if they have been maintained with low mileage, can be very reliable.

Big brute force, Chevy Tahoe/Suburban

Jeep Cherokee Laredo/Limited

Range Rover = Costly repairs and always breaking down.

Personally I like the look of the landcruisers the most.

Alon
__________________
'92 300CE - Sold
2004 C240 - 744 - C7 Wheels - Android Radio
2002 C320 - 816 - Sport Wagon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-03-2002, 08:30 AM
MedMech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Go with the Toyota. I wish I still had my 92 4-Runner.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-03-2002, 10:14 AM
engatwork's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Soperton, Ga. USA
Posts: 14,242
I like the Honda CR-V. Honda is coming out with a bigger version later this year called the Honda Pilot. Ours has been as reliable as anything we have ever owned.
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-03-2002, 11:45 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Posts: 5,480
As the happy owner of an '87 Isuzu pickup with 160,000 miles, my vote for cheap used SUV goes to Isuzu Trooper. (Yeah! I know Consumer Reports calls it the 'SUV of Death!) A friend bought a used '87 Trooper and drove it for almost 100,000 miles. It finally died at about 170,000 after survivng 3 kids, numerous dogs and cats, trips to the dump, and several snowy, salty winters with less than minimal maintenance. He replaced it with a '96 Land Rover Discovery. Seems about every other month, it dumps some expensive part which is only availible from the Land Rover Dealer for a 'blackmail' price! (Around Christmas, the rear antilock wheel sensor - $525, this week the alternator - $610, OUCH!)

Happy Motoring,
Mark
__________________
DrDKW
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-03-2002, 12:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: El Mirage,California
Posts: 2,643
Howdy Chicagoland,
The question is a little vague. Here are some things to consider. Are you going to need it to carry a lot of people?¿(5 or more) then you need one of the big boats. Are you going to need it for stuff and just a couple people?¿(midsize) Is it a daily driver for one or 2 people?¿(something small like Suzuki or Wrangler). Are you going to go off-road?¿ Tough, tight trails you would want something that is rugged enough to handle it or something that is easy and cheap to fix(again Wrangler or Suzuki). And then find it for less than $10,000. Sorry to muddy the waters
__________________
Frank X. Morris
17 Kia Niro
08 Jeep Wrangler 4 door unlimited
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-03-2002, 08:29 PM
Chicagoland
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Here is more info. I am looking at a pre-owned SUV. My wife will be driving this SUV as a daily driver. 2-3 people.

Thanks,
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-03-2002, 08:31 PM
Chicagoland
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
One more important element. The vehicle must have a good crash rating!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-03-2002, 08:38 PM
jsmith's Avatar
Ronin
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: At Sea
Posts: 1,729
i think the question as posed is enough to get proper answers. having picked up a 90's w124 i am into the whole economics of buying used. i mean, a new land cruiser is $50k! recent models would be out of your price range.

under $10k will get you an early 90's 4-runner. a land cruiser is probably a bit more although i would prefer that over the 4-runner. stay away from the rovers...
__________________
joE
1993 300e-2.8
- gone now <sigh>
"Do not adjust your mind, it's reality that's malfunctioning"
http://banners.wunderground.com/bann...L/Key_West.gif
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-03-2002, 09:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: El Mirage,California
Posts: 2,643
Howdy Chicagoland,
Now you will get several good recomendations that will give you a choice. I don't know about the crash test part on the Jeep Cherokee but it would be my choice. Find one with the 6 cylinder engine. Good luck in your hunt.
__________________
Frank X. Morris
17 Kia Niro
08 Jeep Wrangler 4 door unlimited
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-03-2002, 10:38 PM
zr one's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: toronto canada
Posts: 85
1985-1991 jeep grand wagoneer 4x4 360 with the select a trac man what a solid truck....i cryed when i sold my 87...woody (stickered)and all.
all she wanted was gas
__________________
1992 500E silver
1990 300ce AMG
1993 500e smoke silver-sold
1992 500e sold pearl black-sold
1966 mustang converible 289
1969 camaro x11
1991 ZR-1
1972 corvette roadster
2000 dodge cummins 4x4 sold
1994 e320 sold
1987 560sec Brabus
1987 300E (my first benz)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-03-2002, 11:18 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern California, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,538
I've read quite a bit about the reliability of the 4.0 liter straight 6 in the Jeep Cherokees.

I also can highly recommend the Toyota 4-runner, but I caution that they don't depreciate very much, thus expensive.

The Nissan Pathfinders are wonderful SUV's. What's more is they are unibody, not body on frame, so they ride more carlike and creak-free. Nissan's also depreciate more than Toyota's so they are a better used car buy.

If it was my money and I needed 4WD, I'd buy a Subaru wagon instead. A Subaru Outback has more interior room than a Ford Explorer or a Toyota 4 Runner. SUV's are dinosaurs. They have no sport and little utility. They drive terrible on the highway. They get terrible gas mileage. They also have marginal crash ratings, by and large. I know they have larger mass, but they don't have great crash protection engineered in them. Did you see the crash tests of the Ford 150's? They safety cages completely collapsed in off-set crash testing. Very scary.
__________________
Paul S.

2001 E430, Bourdeaux Red, Oyster interior.
79,200 miles.

1973 280SE 4.5, 170,000 miles. 568 Signal Red, Black MB Tex. "The Red Baron".
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-03-2002, 11:49 PM
rmasteller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lithopolis, Ohio
Posts: 706
Did someone say crash test? See the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety site here:
Crash Test Results

They don't go back too far, so finding one of your $10,000 cars here will be difficult, but looking around enough will allow you to see a trend on who has been historically safer. Also, see who makes the most models across the board that are safe. Very interesting stuff. Example: The '96-'99 E-Class MB was not too good in the frontal off-set crash, but '00-present is a lot better.

__________________
NOW: 2017 C43 AMG, 2006 Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon, 1966 230SL, 1980 450SL (for sale!)
PAST: 2006 C230, 1997 E300D, 1994 E420, 1994 Neon Spt Cpe, 1984 300ZX, 1983 Celica GT, 1976 Electra Limited, 1984 Honda Nighthawk 650, 1979 Suzuki PE175, 1978 Suzuki DS100
www.mbca.org - www.sl113.org - www.ohio4x4.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mixed opinions on Range rover problem.... Ashman Off-Topic Discussion 13 07-28-2008 06:12 PM
Range Rover Classic (Almost) Dead at 190,000 Miles TROVERMAN Off-Topic Discussion 4 04-13-2004 07:37 PM
Range Rover Mercedes Diesel Conversion DIESELNATION Diesel Discussion 6 12-26-2002 10:58 AM
Best used in $10K to $16K price range? LankyBlue Off-Topic Discussion 4 05-13-2002 12:09 PM
Range Rover Fixed!!! Ashman Off-Topic Discussion 1 05-11-2002 10:26 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page