The definition of crazy usually is arrived after an action. There are no known defenses of "crazy" except 1984 style monitoring which introduces a bevy of flaws and right restrictions. That only leaves defense from possible actions by crazy people. That in itself is flawed due to the altering of environments and inherent risks involved.

Point is this, since the people that wish harm are hard to pinpoint then all that is left is defense. Removing access to weapons is incorrect and is penalizing the lawful owners of such. That leaves hardening security and education of the threat.

This is nothing more then a brick by brick attempt of disassembling the second amendment then the safety of any school.

__________________
Satan creates nothing: he only ruins everything. He does not invent: he tampers. And his followers are no different ~ Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigaṇ

[QUOTE=Dubyagee;3072162]The definition of crazy usually is arrived after an action. There are no known defenses of "crazy" except 1984 style monitoring which introduces a bevy of flaws and right restrictions. That only leaves defense from possible actions by crazy people. That in itself is flawed due to the altering of environments and inherent risks involved.

Point is this, since the people that wish harm are hard to pinpoint then all that is left is defense. Removing access to weapons is incorrect and is penalizing the lawful owners of such. That leaves hardening security and education of the threat.

This is nothing more then a brick by brick attempt of disassembling the second amendment then the safety of any school.[/QUOTE]


Yes, the fight to maintain freedom is a continuing thing.

__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel