Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 03-13-2013, 12:18 AM
Ara T.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 2,075
Haven't used an optical drive in years... non issue for me. That said, it is pretty dumb of MS to expect that out of the average user.

__________________
1985 CA 300D Turbo , 213K mi
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-13-2013, 04:12 AM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,432
Umm

Quote:
Originally Posted by pawoSD View Post
Office 2013 is great.

I detect people using ancient junky computers.


DVD? Whats that? Oh yeah.....DefunctVideoDisc


Saying "lots of memory and huge hard drive" these days means your PC is reeealy old. Office 2013 will run just fine on any PC from the past 4-5 years with at least Vista on it.
That is a fact of economics, more than 50% of users have laptop and/or desk top CPU's over 10 years old.
If MS and others want to reduce their market, that is fine with me.
Websites are the same, they get 3 seconds to load a page, if it is too bloated with trash = I am gone...

OK, I forgot to mention.
This month I have been testing a maxed out "Alienware M17x", with several OS boot options.

My opinion remains, MS Office 2013 is limp bloated dreck.

I would junk all of my desk top CPU's, if I could keep the Laptop.

.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-13-2013, 06:49 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by pawoSD View Post
...
Saying "lots of memory and huge hard drive" these days means your PC is reeealy old. Office 2013 will run just fine on any PC from the past 4-5 years with at least Vista on it.
Clearly you don't work with large datasets.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-13-2013, 09:11 AM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
Clearly you don't work with large datasets.
No but I help people who do.

Office 2013 is indeed bloated, but when run on a modern PC is should not be an issue.


Economics is a poor argument for having an antiquated pc, you can buy so much computing power for hardly anything these days that is not even relevant anymore. A modern smartphone has more computing power than the average 7-8 year old PC.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-13-2013, 09:19 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by pawoSD View Post
No but I help people who do.

Office 2013 is indeed bloated, but when run on a modern PC is should not be an issue.


Economics is a poor argument for having an antiquated pc, you can buy so much computing power for hardly anything these days that is not even relevant anymore. A modern smartphone has more computing power than the average 7-8 year old PC.
This still doesn't change the arguments against the horribly misdesigned click-to-run install which ass-u-me's that everyone has 10 mb/s Internet access.

Furthermore -- "You can lease a new Kia for $99/mo that will outperform your W123. Why are you still driving that obsolete, inferior W123 and spending $75/mo on repairs?" If it ain't broke...
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-13-2013, 09:58 AM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
I used to have binders filled with OS and software install discs . . . Now, not so much and there's no issues with the PCs and Macs in the house.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-13-2013, 10:01 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTI View Post
I used to have binders filled with OS and software install discs . . . Now, not so much and there's no issues with the PCs and Macs in the house.
I'd rather have a few thumb drives filled with install images and product keys. If my hard drive or SSD shytes the bed, I can reinstall within minutes rather than waiting hours for a streaming install. Yeah, yeah updates -- software WORKS without them and they can be done on my own time.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-13-2013, 10:17 AM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
Hours to stream? You must be so in love with that Hayes Smartmodem . . .
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-13-2013, 10:25 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTI View Post
Hours to stream? You must be so in love with that Hayes Smartmodem . . .
I've never seen Orifice click-to-run install in less than an hour -- the bottleneck may be at MS's end. The process seems to be download a bit, install a bit, download some more, rather than downloading the whole package at once.

I'd rather have a full install that's a known, fully functional entity. Once install says it's done, it should be 100% done. Click-to-run is basically an evil combination of the worst traits of online and 1.44mb floppy-disk distribution systems, combined with Microsoft's typical lack of transparency.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-13-2013, 12:34 PM
JamesDean's Avatar
Electrical Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 5,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by pawoSD View Post
Economics is a poor argument for having an antiquated pc, you can buy so much computing power for hardly anything these days that is not even relevant anymore. A modern smartphone has more computing power than the average 7-8 year old PC.
I agree. This is a poor argument. Trying to support that much legacy stuff can be crippling.

I tried OpenOffice once. It was a clunky piece of crap.
__________________
Cruise Control not working? Send me PM or email (jamesdean59@gmail.com). I might be able to help out.
Check here for compatibility, diagnostics, and availability!

(4/11/2020: Hi Everyone! I am still taking orders and replying to emails/PMs/etc, I appreciate your patience in these crazy times. Stay safe and healthy!)


82 300SD 145k
89 420SEL 210k
89 560SEL 118k
90 300SE 262k RIP 5/25/2010
90 560SEL 154k
91 300D 2.5 Turbo. 241k
93 190E 3.0 235k
93 300E 195k
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-13-2013, 12:35 PM
JamesDean's Avatar
Electrical Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 5,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
I've never seen Orifice click-to-run install in less than an hour -- the bottleneck may be at MS's end. The process seems to be download a bit, install a bit, download some more, rather than downloading the whole package at once.

I'd rather have a full install that's a known, fully functional entity. Once install says it's done, it should be 100% done. Click-to-run is basically an evil combination of the worst traits of online and 1.44mb floppy-disk distribution systems, combined with Microsoft's typical lack of transparency.
I dont see any problem with this method of download some packages, install and go to the next package..

Thats pretty much how linux works when you install/upgrade software.
__________________
Cruise Control not working? Send me PM or email (jamesdean59@gmail.com). I might be able to help out.
Check here for compatibility, diagnostics, and availability!

(4/11/2020: Hi Everyone! I am still taking orders and replying to emails/PMs/etc, I appreciate your patience in these crazy times. Stay safe and healthy!)


82 300SD 145k
89 420SEL 210k
89 560SEL 118k
90 300SE 262k RIP 5/25/2010
90 560SEL 154k
91 300D 2.5 Turbo. 241k
93 190E 3.0 235k
93 300E 195k
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-13-2013, 12:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesDean View Post
I agree. This is a poor argument. Trying to support that much legacy stuff can be crippling.

I tried OpenOffice once. It was a clunky piece of crap.
The current versions aren't any slower nor worse to use than MS Office.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-13-2013, 12:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesDean View Post
I dont see any problem with this method of download some packages, install and go to the next package..

Thats pretty much how linux works when you install/upgrade software.
The difference is that the Linux installs readily indicate what stage they're at. Additionally, they don't imply functionality before the download of a package is fully completed, whereas Office does.

At the very least, there should be a "full install" option that indicates completion when downloading and installation are done.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-13-2013, 01:12 PM
anghrist's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lancaster, CA
Posts: 558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
Clearly you don't work with large datasets.
Or write embedded software in x86 Assembly Language.
__________________
2013 Volkswagen Jetta Hybrid SEL Premium (Sparky)
http://badges.fuelly.com/images/smallsig-us/193500.png


It's a car not a science experiment! Open the throttle!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-13-2013, 02:26 PM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,432
NO

Quote:
Originally Posted by pawoSD View Post
No but I help people who do.

Office 2013 is indeed bloated, but when run on a modern PC is should not be an issue.


Economics is a poor argument for having an antiquated pc, you can buy so much computing power for hardly anything these days that is not even relevant anymore. A modern smartphone has more computing power than the average 7-8 year old PC.
My view of smart phones:

* The cost is insane.
* They are stupid delicate.
* I wear glasses now = screen too small.
* They are outdated before reaching market.
* Dead zones = IMO worse than basic dumb cell.
* The planned obsolescence cycle is two years or less.
* All insurance I have found, refuse to cover more than two replacements per year. (five dumb cells in 2012).


.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page