Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211  
Old 04-16-2013, 10:41 AM
rickmay's Avatar
like music to my ears
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicago area, soon to be in lower taxed area
Posts: 117
NO, and YES

If you are referring to the arrow on the lower left, the engineer had also drawn an opposing arrow from the tire. This braking force causes the rotation around the center of gravity.

No, matter, the technical explanation. I have more information. Mercedes identifies the trailing arm as a "trailing arm." As time has progressed, it is more correctly called a semi-trailing arm. A trailing arm runs straight-a-way to the rear of the car. A semi-trailing arm is at an angle, such as in a W123.

I also found terminology of what I have been calling a "dip." It is actually termed "anti-lift" technology. Mercedes, BMW, Porsche have all used this anti-lift technology and it is attributed to the rear semi-trailing arm. Here is a link that discusses these technologies.

April 2000

Here are the specs on a Mercedes W126 - 500ESonder

W126-500SESonder-2-Fahrwerk/en

Please note the third line item (rear suspension) on trailing arms; it says,
semi-trailing arm axle with starting- and braking-torque compensation. At this point the actual physics behind this is inconsequential to me. All that matters is that the rear of the car dips because of anti-lift technology. Under normal braking conditions, my early Mercedes stayed quite flat.

So, Brian, you originally said there is no such thing and that I should patent it. Brian, somebody already has, almost 50 years ago. Now, I see you coming around a little bit, but your thinking is likey (making your last explanation, very, very doubtful) wrong since my calipers are on the rear-side of the axle.

Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 04-16-2013, 10:43 AM
rickmay's Avatar
like music to my ears
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicago area, soon to be in lower taxed area
Posts: 117
Did you know that Mercedes

has large full sized diesel cars that get 45 MPG highway?

Is that true, Brian?
Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 04-16-2013, 10:45 AM
rickmay's Avatar
like music to my ears
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicago area, soon to be in lower taxed area
Posts: 117
and yes, Sixto

In the right hands, four wheel drive racing cars far out-perform two wheel drive cars. See earlier post.
Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 04-16-2013, 11:21 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,942
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickmay View Post
If you are referring to the arrow on the lower left, the engineer had also drawn an opposing arrow from the tire. This braking force causes the rotation around the center of gravity.

No, matter, the technical explanation. I have more information. Mercedes identifies the trailing arm as a "trailing arm." As time has progressed, it is more correctly called a semi-trailing arm. A trailing arm runs straight-a-way to the rear of the car. A semi-trailing arm is at an angle, such as in a W123.

I also found terminology of what I have been calling a "dip." It is actually termed "anti-lift" technology. Mercedes, BMW, Porsche have all used this anti-lift technology and it is attributed to the rear semi-trailing arm. Here is a link that discusses these technologies.

April 2000

Here are the specs on a Mercedes W126 - 500ESonder

W126-500SESonder-2-Fahrwerk/en

Please note the third line item (rear suspension) on trailing arms; it says,
semi-trailing arm axle with starting- and braking-torque compensation. At this point the actual physics behind this is inconsequential to me. All that matters is that the rear of the car dips because of anti-lift technology. Under normal braking conditions, my early Mercedes stayed quite flat.

So, Brian, you originally said there is no such thing and that I should patent it. Brian, somebody already has, almost 50 years ago. Now, I see you coming around a little bit, but your thinking is likey (making your last explanation, very, very doubtful) wrong since my calipers are on the rear-side of the axle.
Just because they have anti lift features in the design does not mean it actually dips under braking.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 04-16-2013, 11:34 AM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickmay View Post
has large full sized diesel cars that get 45 MPG highway?

Is that true, Brian?

sure, according to craigslist and ebay, my 240 is under performing. It should be running at least 50mpg.

__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 04-16-2013, 11:56 AM
rickmay's Avatar
like music to my ears
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicago area, soon to be in lower taxed area
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
Congratulations.

You have successfully redefined physics and have figured out how to make both the front and the rear of a vehicle compress their springs equally in a braking situation, despite the fact that the CG of the vehicle forces a significant weight transfer to the front wheels.

In a panic stop, the rear wheels are practically unloaded completely.

You really ought to patent this invention as the automobile manufacturers would be highly interested in understanding how it works.

Here is some more reading material for you.

Automobile Ride, Handling, and Suspension

A whole write-up on suspensions, but if you scroll down to near the very end, there is a info on Trailing Arm and Semi-Trailing Arm Suspensions. It looks an awful lot like my W123 rear end, and my 280S rear end.

It also seems to say, "Rear end lift during braking is countered by the downward component at the leading end of the arms. (semi-trailing arms, that is).

One need not understand all of the physics, but THAT IS "how it works."

It dips. No, it squats. No, it is anti-lift (huh?).
Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 04-16-2013, 01:39 PM
rickmay's Avatar
like music to my ears
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicago area, soon to be in lower taxed area
Posts: 117
twalgamuth

twalgamuth said,
Just because they have anti lift features in the design does not mean it actually dips under braking.

My 280S surely dipped in the rear end under normal braking conditions.

I still suspect it has to do with the greater gripping power of the organic brake pads that were on these cars when new. So, I decided to see if the organic pads were still available. Organic brake pads are known for their "high initial brake effect," according to Summit Racing. CAll it, "getting ahead of the dip."

T, have you tried organic pads, or did you switch to ceramic to avoid the extra dust? If you did, you did at least one thing to change the dynamics of your rear suspension. Did you put on heavy duty shock absorbers? If you did, you changed the dynamics of your rear suspension. Did you replace your rotors with the same ones Mercedes used in the eighties? Doubtful, so you have changed the dynamics of your rear suspension. If I remember correctly, MB used cast iron rotors, which also may not be around any more. Cast iron would also create a "high initial brake effect," to get ahead of the dip.

So, let's talk about rotors. These cars likely had cast iron rotors when they came out. Brembo states that, cast-iron, "chosen for its superior friction coefficient, high-heat and moisture-absorbtion capabilities." Brembo also no longer makes cast iron rotors. While Brembo is relating this to motor cycles, the technology timeline was similar for cars.

Brembo Rotors

So, what do you have in your car? It is likely a carbon steel rotor, which lasts longer and rusts less easily, BUT, it does not have as high a friction coefficient. Carbon fiber and carbon steel is used today as they have less weight.

So, if you thought you brought your car "up to specs" because you went to J. C. Whitney and bought the latest in ceramic pads and carbon steel rotors, I will tell you that your brakes are only about 75-90% of what they were when new. My guess is that your brakes are more like 75% functional when compared to a car coming off the showroom floor. It takes more pedal power to stop my 1983 240D than the cars I owned new back then, and my master cylinder has an extra 1/16 to 1/8 of an inch bore.

And, I checked again. My rear rotors are still behind the axle.
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 04-16-2013, 03:38 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,942
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickmay View Post
twalgamuth said,
Just because they have anti lift features in the design does not mean it actually dips under braking.

My 280S surely dipped in the rear end under normal braking conditions.

I still suspect it has to do with the greater gripping power of the organic brake pads that were on these cars when new. So, I decided to see if the organic pads were still available. Organic brake pads are known for their "high initial brake effect," according to Summit Racing. CAll it, "getting ahead of the dip."

T, have you tried organic pads, or did you switch to ceramic to avoid the extra dust? If you did, you did at least one thing to change the dynamics of your rear suspension. Did you put on heavy duty shock absorbers? If you did, you changed the dynamics of your rear suspension. Did you replace your rotors with the same ones Mercedes used in the eighties? Doubtful, so you have changed the dynamics of your rear suspension. If I remember correctly, MB used cast iron rotors, which also may not be around any more. Cast iron would also create a "high initial brake effect," to get ahead of the dip.

So, let's talk about rotors. These cars likely had cast iron rotors when they came out. Brembo states that, cast-iron, "chosen for its superior friction coefficient, high-heat and moisture-absorbtion capabilities." Brembo also no longer makes cast iron rotors. While Brembo is relating this to motor cycles, the technology timeline was similar for cars.

Brembo Rotors

So, what do you have in your car? It is likely a carbon steel rotor, which lasts longer and rusts less easily, BUT, it does not have as high a friction coefficient. Carbon fiber and carbon steel is used today as they have less weight.

So, if you thought you brought your car "up to specs" because you went to J. C. Whitney and bought the latest in ceramic pads and carbon steel rotors, I will tell you that your brakes are only about 75-90% of what they were when new. My guess is that your brakes are more like 75% functional when compared to a car coming off the showroom floor. It takes more pedal power to stop my 1983 240D than the cars I owned new back then, and my master cylinder has an extra 1/16 to 1/8 of an inch bore.

And, I checked again. My rear rotors are still behind the axle.
If they are you better not drive it until you get that straightened out.

You gotta take a rest from this subject Rick. Nobody is with you on this. You cannot change the physics of it no matter how much anti dive is built into the suspension, unless you have a full on active suspension run by a computer you are not going to get squat under braking no matter what position the caliper is on the rotor.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 04-16-2013, 04:50 PM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Isn't the Mercedes technology referred to as 'Anti-lift, Anti-squat'??
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #220  
Old 04-16-2013, 05:51 PM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickmay View Post
And, I checked again. My rear rotors are still behind the axle.
My rotors are kind of centered around the hub...

Front and rear calipers are aft on my w126.
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #221  
Old 04-16-2013, 06:34 PM
A Talent for Obfuscation
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: In the Deep State
Posts: 19,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbdiesel View Post
My rotors are kind of centered around the hub...

Front and rear calipers are aft on my w126.
Behind the rear bumper?
Reply With Quote
  #222  
Old 04-16-2013, 09:54 PM
Mölyapina's Avatar
User title not in use
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Chelmsford, Massachusetts
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by P.C. View Post
I was driving a newish Honda Pilot today in traffic and had to make a hard stop because some arse was driving the wrong way on a one-way street. I marveled how the 4-wheel ABS discs brought the car to a smooth, short stop, but what really wowed me was how the rear end dipped down...
NOOO! Don't do it! Don't do it! Delete that! Now!

__________________
"Senior Luna, your sense of humor is still loco... but we love it, anyway." -rickymay ____ "Your sense of humor is still loco... " -MBeige ____ "Señor Luna, your sense of humor is quite järjetön" -Delibes

1982 300SD -- 211k, Texas car, tranny issues ____ 1979 240D 4-speed 234k -- turbo and tuned IP, third world taxi hot rod

2 Samuel 12:13: "David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord.” And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die."
Reply With Quote
  #223  
Old 04-16-2013, 10:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
If they are you better not drive it until you get that straightened out.

You gotta take a rest from this subject Rick. Nobody is with you on this. You cannot change the physics of it no matter how much anti dive is built into the suspension, unless you have a full on active suspension run by a computer you are not going to get squat under braking no matter what position the caliper is on the rotor.
Why a computer? You could have a fully hydraulic compensator actuated by brake-line pressure. Not sure if it would be worth it, but you could. (And if you think about it, Citroen did insane things with their hydraulic systems in the 60s. Not a microchip or transistor in sight.)
Reply With Quote
  #224  
Old 04-17-2013, 09:48 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickmay View Post
One need not understand all of the physics, but THAT IS "how it works."
I agree. There are plenty of folks in the world that don't understand any physics and they are very similar to yourself. They already KNOW how it works.

Therefore, it is pointless to discuss any physics or engineering with them since they already know the answer.
Reply With Quote
  #225  
Old 04-17-2013, 10:02 AM
Mölyapina's Avatar
User title not in use
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Chelmsford, Massachusetts
Posts: 4,373
Okay, here we go:

I was driving our Corolla yesterday, and I made a panic stop for a stopped vehicle. The rear not only dipped down, it went lower than the front end. I have to side with rickymays on this one -- I was with you until now, Brian, but I guess the "laws of physics" can be broken occasionally, just like speed limits. Whatever it is, the rear of the Corolla made a noticeable dip down.

Sorry, but the truth must be known.

__________________
"Senior Luna, your sense of humor is still loco... but we love it, anyway." -rickymay ____ "Your sense of humor is still loco... " -MBeige ____ "Señor Luna, your sense of humor is quite järjetön" -Delibes

1982 300SD -- 211k, Texas car, tranny issues ____ 1979 240D 4-speed 234k -- turbo and tuned IP, third world taxi hot rod

2 Samuel 12:13: "David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord.” And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page