cmbdiesel |
07-21-2013 03:32 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTUpower
(Post 3179641)
I have friends in the Hollywood/film industry and they don't say WET. A quick google shows no "white entertainment television" links. Care to back up your defense of your friends racist term?
I believe in the duality that either races are different or we should not have nor recognize races at all. Different will always invite the comparison of which is better. It is impossible to NOT compare and then come to a conclusion of which is "better". As I have said earlier- medical reasons withstanding- there is little or no use in recognizing "race" in a mixed world and doing so has made our world worse.
Genetic superiority is fact, not a belief. I proved to you earlier this month with genes and world records. You wish to ignore this because it does not fit into your political POV. Don't go pushing that so mean one race is superior to another race- it means genes dictate what some people will do and do better than others who do not have that gene. It does not mean all of any race is better than all of any other race in any way, shape or form as we as the human race understand genetics. For example tall people are superior tree climbers to short people. Genes make you tall or short. Some groups which could be construed to be a "race" are taller than some other group which could be construed to be a "race". Therefore the first race is superior tree climbers. They are not a superior race however.
I don't believe any "race" is "better" than any other "race", period. Either you accept they are different and thereby open up the ugly comparisons which are and always will be forthcoming or you say people do not have a race. I choose and always have to ignore race unless absolutely needed; btw skin color is NOT race to me.
|
I'm not typically a TV guy, but I have heard the terms used.
Try googling it spelled out, not as an acronym.
If you had an issue with the term, maybe you should have taken it up with 10fords, as he was the one who presented it in this post.
http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/3179429-post685.html
You speak from both sides, so it is difficult to understand exactly the jist of what you are saying, that's why I let it drop last time we were discussing this.
I believe you still rely on outdated and flawed science for your conclusions.
The world records and such that you speak of are primarily the result of locational factors, not racial ones.
Reading the last part of your post here, I think we are saying the same thing, in different ways
|