![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Or are we going to get a 'We did things with a handshake back then' story... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Forgetting (if possible) this current event….
Under what circumstances would one argue that taking-up arms against the government (any government) is a reasonable course? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Wait, I know, when the IRS takes too long to allow tax-free status... Both of those ought to merit armed uprising. I would like to say that there has never been a good enough reason to take up arms against our government. For one thing, you'll lose every time. http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/open-discussion/353369-navy-so-awsome.html |
Quote:
|
Quote:
FROM WHAT IVE READ, he has not broken the law. If he broke the law find a tree a rope and call me. I'll personally slap the horse on the ass. |
Quote:
The way we know which is justified is by who writes the history. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Not broken the law? Then why would a US Federal Court have issued an order to cease and desist the grazing? I guess following the court's order was "optional?"
Part of the Order granting permanent injunction against Mr. Bundy: Nor is there a legitimate dispute that Bundy has grazed his cattle on the New Trespass Lands without federal authorization. The United States has submitted Bundy’s deposition excerpts indicating that Bundy has grazed livestock on the New Trespass Lands. Bundy principally opposes the United States’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction because the United States does not own the public lands in question. As this court previously ruled in United States v. Bundy, Case No. CV-S-98-531-JBR (RJJ) (D. Nev. Nov. 4, 1998), “the public lands in Nevada are the property of the United States because the United States has held title to those public lands since 1848, when Mexico ceded the land to the United States. CV-S-98-531 at 8 (citing United States v. Gardner, 107 F.3d 1314, 1318 (9th Cir. 1997)) Bundy [also contends] the observed cattle bearing his brand may not in fact be his own. Finally, the public interest is served by the enforcement of Congress’ mandate for management of the public rangelands, and by having federal laws and regulations applied to all citizens equally. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:United_States_v_Bundy_Court_Order_July_2013.pdf&page=3 The cattle seized were branded with Mr. Bundy's brand. :D |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website