05-04-2014, 01:46 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aklim
What has being a conservative or liberal or racist or anti-racist or history buff got to do with anything. Sounds like he is little more than a deadbeat tenant who is trying to wrap up his actions in the "flag and apple pie" routine to make himself sound heroic. People with an ax to grind will pick a side to justify their position.
He is just a unwilling to pay tenant who is being asked to leave. What has any philosophy got to do with the case at hand? The law is pretty clear. If you disagree we have a court system. If you cannot and/or will not abide by it, find yourself another country that is more in agreement with you. Is it simpler than that?
|
What if the judge in the court system YOU promote has a financial interest in the proceedings before him/her? As in a certain judge which has investments with Vanguard Securities but when asked to recuse himself involving a case INVOLVING Vanguard Securities refused to do so? Can you say BIAS/CONFLICT OF INTEREST? I knew you could.........
How about the fact that many of those who have won in court AND those who LOST in court have rated the experience "unsatisfactory" as opposed to those who opt for Binding Arbitration which has a better than 90% SATISFACTION rating?
There is one MAJOR MAJOR problem with using binding arbitration versus going to court. You end up cutting out that $500 an hour ATTOURNER (twister, transfer agent???) out of his piece of the pie. What a drag for the BAR association members, you chose to take the high road rather than fill a lawyer's pockets full of coin.
The court system is run and operated by the GOVERNMENT versus Binding Arbitration which IS a PRIVATE ENTERPRISE operation. Again, Binding Arbitration enjoys a substantially higher user satisfaction rating over the Government run court system.
"People get the government they DESERVE."
- Will Rogers
Be careful what you ask for because you just might get it.
|
Threaded Mode
