Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2005, 11:31 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
S320 vs S420

How are the S320's? Is the car to big for the I6? How does the I6 compare to the small V8 in fuel mileage and ease of fixing the thing? I am not to concerned about speed but I would like a little pick up. Lets put it this way if an S320 is faster than my 300SDL it would be fast enough for me.

I see some very clean looking 97-99 S320's in the $16k range. Assuming the evap core is done these seem like a good buy. The S320's probably have fewer options, buying the last year of a base model seems like a good buy.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2005, 11:52 PM
Geezer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 1,316
This may get you started.

http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/overview.aspx?modelid=1917&src=vip

Um, the W140's weigh about 4,700 lbs!

S320 4,700 lb / 228 hp = 20.6 lbs/hp
S420 4,700 lb / 275 hp = 17.1 lbs/hp

More M-B model information here...

http://home.hiwaay.net/~gbf/mbmodels.html

300SDL 3,900 lbs / 148 hp = 26.4 lbs/hp

240D 3,250 lbs / 67 hp = 48.5 lbs/hp

Rear axle ratios may differ, and will make up some of the difference, so don't take this too seriously.

I doubt that any car that M-B produced was really too underpowered, and besides, what's your hurry?

Best Regards,
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-08-2005, 01:38 AM
AlexTheSeal's Avatar
Addicted to torque
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warren, OR
Posts: 248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim H
Rear axle ratios may differ, and will make up some of the difference, so don't take this too seriously.

I doubt that any car that M-B produced was really too underpowered
Bingo. You just have to hit the go pedal a little harder, and what's wrong with that? No sweeter sound in the world than a straight six working for a living. Don't be one of those typical American bozo drivers who thinks any car with less than a 300-hp V-8 is underpowered just because you have to push the accelerator down more than an eighth of an inch when you're merging onto the freeway.
__________________
AlexTheSeal: hack mechanic, inadvertent drifting champ, builder of infernal devices, professional epistemologist

'87 300D Turbo, roadtrip mileage champ (for sale!)
'92 Isuzu Trooper, mudder extraordinaire (for sale!)
'82 Honda Silverwing, cockroach of motorcycles
And various boring daily drivers...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-08-2005, 09:19 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexTheSeal
Bingo. You just have to hit the go pedal a little harder, and what's wrong with that? No sweeter sound in the world than a straight six working for a living. Don't be one of those typical American bozo drivers who thinks any car with less than a 300-hp V-8 is underpowered just because you have to push the accelerator down more than an eighth of an inch when you're merging onto the freeway.
Exactly. What Alex said, Hattie.

You are not going to race anybody up I-95 anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-08-2005, 09:24 AM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Exactly I cannot afford to speed I pay enough in insurance already. So an S320 is a lot faster than my SDL, ok that is plenty of speed for me. A base W140 has more options than I will every use, I realy only want, power windows, climate control, power seats, and a sunroof.

But another aspect of this, the V8 might get better fuel mileage. I know the 420SEL's get better mileage than the 300SEL's. The V8 doesn't have to work as hard to move the car around.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-08-2005, 09:42 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy
But another aspect of this, the V8 might get better fuel mileage. I know the 420SEL's get better mileage than the 300SEL's. The V8 doesn't have to work as hard to move the car around.
Do you have some data on this? I would have a difficult time believing that the V8 can get better mileage than the I-6 unless the gearing on the V-8 is much taller. IIRC, they geared the I-6 very short because they were concerned with the lack of power. This would hurt the I-6 badly on the highway.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-08-2005, 10:49 AM
Geezer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 1,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy
So an S320 is a lot faster than my SDL, ok that is plenty of speed for me....
Umm, Hattie, it may not be any faster, since at 100 mph they are the same speed. It might be a little quicker 0 to 60mph, though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy
But another aspect of this, the V8 might get better fuel mileage. I know the 420SEL's get better mileage than the 300SEL's. The V8 doesn't have to work as hard to move the car around.
Um, er, actually the I6 and the V8 both have to work as hard, since it takes pretty much the same horsepower to move either car at 70 mph. It's a question of how much fuel it takes to make the required horsepower.

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question262.htm

Exerpted from the above link:

In a car traveling down a highway at the posted speed on level ground, the engine is doing three things:

1. It is overcoming rolling resistance in the drive train.
2. It is overcoming air resistance.
3. It is powering accessories like the alternator, the power steering pump and the air conditioner.


The engine might need to produce no more than 10 or 20 horsepower (HP) to carry this load. The reason why cars have 100- or 200-horsepower engines to is handle acceleration from a standing stop, as well as for passing and hill climbing. We only use the maximum HP rating for 1% of our driving time. The rest of the time, we are carrying around the weight and the friction of the much larger engine, which wastes a lot of energy.


All cars can cruise all day long at freeway-legal speeds. M-B's will do it in a certain comfort.

Our SDL's, or even the 67hp 240D, make quite enough horsepower to run down the highway. Oh, they may not make as much horsepower as the big gassers, and it therefore takes a few seconds more to reach cruising speed, but they use less fuel (25-30mpg instead of 15-17mpg) to make the required horsepower.

Hope this makes sense.

Best Regards,
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-08-2005, 10:42 AM
A. Rosich's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim H

I doubt that any car that M-B produced was really too underpowered, and besides, what's your hurry?

Best Regards,
Jim


What about these few examples (I know they were NOT imported in the U.S., but they were available worldwide):

W126 260SE 2.6 liter 6-cyl
W140 280SE / S280 2.8 liter 6-cyl
W124 200E / E200 2.0 liter 4-cyl gasoline
W124 200D / E200 Diesel 2.0 liter 4-cyl

All of the previous models were exceptionally underpowered and slow, created to satisfy the demand at markets where taxes are very expensive on high powered and/or high displacement engines. Or just to create an "affordable" entry level model to the lineup.

One thing is for sure, a 50 c.c. scooter would overpass any of these cars in the highway easily.
__________________
A. Rosich
CL 500, 1998
S 500 L, 1998
E 320 T, 1995 [Sadly sold ]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-08-2005, 10:57 AM
Geezer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 1,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by A. Rosich
All of the previous models were exceptionally underpowered and slow...
One thing is for sure, a 50 c.c. scooter would overpass any of these cars in the highway easily.
Be careful not to confuse low acceleration with slow speed.

Underpowered, maybe, compared to other, more powerful versions, and certainly underpowered for USA expectations. A lot depends on your wallet, your ego, and urge to beat the guy beside you to the next red light.

Slow, as in slow to accelerate, I have no doubts.

Slow, as in cruisng speed, I don't know... I'd bet they would cruise all day at 70mph, admittedly with your right foot closer to the floor than you'd like.

Oh, I don't think the scooter would really stand a chance in top speed.

Best Regards,
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-09-2005, 02:48 AM
Provo Spain?
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 656
Between 94-99 what are the problems these models are known for?

I did a search on Epinions.com and people seemed to have nothing but great reviews for these things.

EDIT: Went and read the 140 thread, HOLY COW, if that ain't enough to keep me away from these I don't know what is!

Leaning back towards and E now.....
__________________
1994 C 280 117.5k, White (Good as new)
1997 Toyota Camry 149k Miles (Not so pretty anymore)

1990 190e 2.6 95k (Sold-Should not have)
1981 240d Stick ??? Miles...sold

Last edited by Jason Beal; 01-09-2005 at 01:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-09-2005, 06:53 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Well supposidly the later 97-99 models were pretty sorted out, also thats why I would want a more simple model. I figure since the S320/420's just have shocks the suspension shouldn't be anymore expensive or difficult to work on then my W126. The engines shouldn't be very troublesome, both were used with great reliabilty in the E class. The I6's blew head gaskets once in awhile, the M119 V8 is pretty close to flawless. The bodys can act up, stupid stuff like the door close assist can break. But I could live without the stupid options, I would try to fix them but if I couldn't oh well.

With any W140 just make sure the evap has been done, it is a $3k job and I wouldn't buy one unless it has been done.

I don't know W140's kind of scare me, an E430 might be a better choice.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-09-2005, 09:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,726
Quote:
Originally Posted by inetd
But on a darker note, I just read that Di's car was an S320 - and that fool had it going about 130 or so before he hit the wall so we know it'll go that fast.
Princess Diana's car was an unbadged S280 - even more to the point.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-10-2005, 03:16 PM
A. Rosich's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 883
Quote:
Originally Posted by inetd
To me, 5600 lbs is a lot of weight for a 6 cyl. But on a darker note, I just read that Di's car was an S320 - and that fool had it going about 130 or so before he hit the wall so we know it'll go that fast. .


The car where Lady Diana had her accident was not an S 320, nor an S 600 or an S 500 as mistankenly posted originally by many news organizations.

The car was an S 280.

The S 280 was a 2.8 liter, 6-cyl, short wheel base W140 which came standard with a five-speed MANUAL transmission, without A/C, had cloth covered seats, hubcaps instead of alloy wheels, no radio, no power seats and no sunroof.

The top speed of the W140 S 280 is listed on the M.B. brochure as 131 miles per hour.

People or companies who ordered the S 280 rarely specified ANY extras, as they just wanted the basic W140 as cheap as possible.
__________________
A. Rosich
CL 500, 1998
S 500 L, 1998
E 320 T, 1995 [Sadly sold ]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-11-2005, 09:00 AM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
A base S280 would be pretty nice.

From the pics I have seen of hers I am pretty sure it had the standard 8 hole wheels, and leather. I have seen a few S280's for sale in European cars mags and they always seem stripped.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-11-2005, 03:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Camp Hill, PA
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by inetd
But on a darker note, I just read that Di's car was an S320
..
I think the Di death car was actually an armored S280!
__________________
2002 500SL(Black/Black)
1992 300SE(Black/Black)
1992 190E 2.3(White/Navy)
1999 VW Jetta TDI(Pearl Green)
1986 SAAB 900 Base 3 door(White)
1983 Porsche 911SC(Chiffon)
1977 VW Scirocco(DiamondSilver)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page