Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help




Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes ShopForum > Technical Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-11-2001, 04:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Vernon, CT
Posts: 1,846
I am going to be replacing my rear shocks with OEM Bilsteins. The question I have is which would be best for my '80 W116, standard or heavy duty. I tried looking up the part number for the HD shocks, but it came up as not being in the data base. I got the part number for the HD shocks from the benzbin. With the weight of my W116, would a heavy duty shock be best or would it give to harsh of a ride. Not that I want my car to float like a Caddy, but I don't want to have a bone jarring ride either. Also if someone to clearify the removing and replace of the rear shocks. I looked at the manual and it gives the impression that you can remove the shocks with the car on the ground. It says to remove the back seat, unbolt the top bolt through the access hole. Then remove the 2 lower bolts that attach it to the control arm, and just remove it in a downward direction. The reason I am questioning this is because there wouldn't be any room to pull the whole shock out. Maybe the meant to say after removing the top bolt, to raise the vehicle, then remove the 2 lower bolts.
Any past experience from anyone would be greatly appreciated.
__________________
1999 MB SL500 (101,000 mi)
1983 Porsche 911SC (149,000 mi)
2004 Volvo V70 2.5T (205,000 mi)
2014 Tesla Model S 85 (75,000 mi)
PCA member
MBCA member
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-12-2001, 02:29 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: LEMONT-CHICAGO
Posts: 412
By the way nice looking car. I must commend you on the nice condition and also noticed how clean your front wheels are. I think the rear suspension needs to be unloaded in order to get the shocks out of there. I would also recommend heavy duty shocks. The handling will be a little better. The ride will not be too harsh unless you put some harder compound, wider tires on the car.
__________________
1990 190E 2.6
1996 Grand Voyager 3.3
1985 Mustang GT 5.0 5 SPD
1982 Suzuki GS 750T
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-12-2001, 08:11 PM
2.5 TURBO
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Send me back to Atlanta
Posts: 876
on a 300D

My Hayes manual does not say to lift the rear of the car off the ground, but my Chilton's Manual does, so go figure. I would think you would have to remove the wheel and lift the car up..I always did on my Chevys...
__________________
2000 Ford 7.3 Powerstroke 4x4
2006 Mazda Tribute
1983 Black 300 D (donated to charity)
1993 Teal 300 D (160K) Sold
"I love the smell of burnt diesel fuel in the morning, it smells like ....VICTORY"

Semper Fidelis
USMC 1973-1976
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-12-2001, 08:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Vernon, CT
Posts: 1,846
The more I think about it, you probably remove the top bolts with the car on the ground, then jack the car up. With the car on the ground there isn't enough ground clearance to pull out a fully extended shock absorber. Of course when dealing with compressed suspension components, guessing on what to do can be dangerous, so that's why I started this post.
__________________
1999 MB SL500 (101,000 mi)
1983 Porsche 911SC (149,000 mi)
2004 Volvo V70 2.5T (205,000 mi)
2014 Tesla Model S 85 (75,000 mi)
PCA member
MBCA member
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-12-2001, 08:58 PM
SW SW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Houston, TX. USA
Posts: 590
Use the MB jack for proper clearance

I have changed the rear shocks on my w123 using the stock mb jack at full height. They drop right out. I never took the wheel off.
__________________
2001 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins Turbo Diesel - 4x4, auto, 3.54 gears, long bed
-------------------------------------
'92 300D 2.5 Turbodiesel - sold
'83 300D Turbodiesel - 4 speed manual/2.88 diff - sold
'87 300D Turbodiesel - sold
'82 300D Turbodiesel - sold
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-12-2001, 09:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 1,193
I think the standard bilstiens would be fine for your car. That is likely what you have been driving on, and what the car originally came with. Standard doesn't mean soft, it just means its what the car came with. The HDs will firm up the ride a lot more.

__________________
Jason Priest
1999 E430
1995 E420 - retired
1986 420SEL - retired
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rear shocks MlPR ML, GL, G-Wagen, R-Class, Unimog, Sprinter 0 08-06-2004 10:33 PM
1989 MB 560sel rear shocks question?? jeff-abalone Tech Help 1 07-31-2004 07:22 PM
front and rear shocks for '83 300D turbo kenbrady Diesel Discussion 13 04-06-2004 12:44 AM
changing rear shocks on 300E - DIY (?) bd37703 Tech Help 1 04-14-2003 07:33 AM
Rear Shocks for 300 SDL Brad Houck Tech Help 4 08-03-2001 09:50 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2011 Pelican Parts - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page