Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76  
Old 05-22-2008, 10:39 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 57,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by aklim View Post
Didn't that go pretty well?
I thought they just agreed and are in the process of shutting down their reactor?

__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 05-22-2008, 10:47 PM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmash View Post
I thought they just agreed and are in the process of shutting down their reactor?
So they say. But given their past performance, would you trust them or would you believe they might shut it down and start something else up or stop the shutdown halfway?
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 05-22-2008, 10:59 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
I don't care what they're butchering each other for, it's still butchering. The same can be said of Sunni and Shiite Iraqis butchering each other. You could say it's over political power and it mainly is.

I could also say that I've never seen Muslims get all worked up about evolution. Anyway, I'm not a fan of any organized religion, they're all pretty repulsive to me.
You don't care? Boy, I sure do. For ecample, I believe that life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are worth risking my life, the lives of my generation, and generations to come. Life, liberty an dthe pursuit of happiness are most definitely worth the lives of anybody who would stand in opposition to them.

I agree concerning Muslims and evolution. In point of fact, I have never heard of a wacko Christian fundamentalist who threatened harm to anybody who taught or believed or studied evolution, either.

B
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 05-22-2008, 11:00 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by tankdriver View Post
Nobody is reasonable after you've assaulted them. They may temporarily concede, but bet your a$$ they'll take the first shot they can at you.
....
Like Germany, Italy, and Japan for example.

B
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 05-22-2008, 11:01 PM
450slcguy's Avatar
Don't Tread on Me
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 610
Quote:
Originally Posted by aklim View Post
So they say. But given their past performance, would you trust them or would you believe they might shut it down and start something else up or stop the shutdown halfway?

Halfway sounds about right. More hidden programs probably underground. Other programs being exported. They are not to be trusted and they will be back again. Radical regimes will not quit. They will just stall, hide, and deny.
__________________
Question Authority before it Questions you.
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 05-22-2008, 11:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
Like Germany, Italy, and Japan for example.

B
Except they were the invaders/assaulters. Which would make their opponents the ones who took their shots. And throwing up a wall halfway through Germany for ~5 decades. Or nuke two cities in exchange for a naval base.
__________________
1984 300TD
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 05-22-2008, 11:22 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by tankdriver View Post
Except they were the invaders/assaulters. Which would make their opponents the ones who took their shots. And throwing up a wall halfway through Germany for ~5 decades. Or nuke two cities in exchange for a naval base.
Why would it make any difference whether or not a country is the aggressor or not? Or are you advocating division of Iraq or of nuking Iraq?

You might recall that wars have been fought many times before. Sometimes to resolution and sometimes not. In my estimation, there is no generalization worth a damn because the details are extremely important and to ignore them is to blind oneself.

B
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 05-22-2008, 11:40 PM
cmac2012's Avatar
Me, Myself, and I
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 38,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwood View Post
My question exactly; who said anything about negotiations?
Exactly. If you refuse to even meet with an adversary and hear their complaints, and offer your counter claims, not much chance of making any sort of progress. Doesn't mean you're offering to give them the store.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 05-22-2008, 11:43 PM
cmac2012's Avatar
Me, Myself, and I
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 38,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
Nah, I just put that in there as a silly response to your equally silly and opposite statement, "Right wing hawks would have us believe that “appeasement” means doing anything other than acting as though we have the right to control the world unilaterally."

When I see statements like, "All XXXX believe YYYY" it makes me cringe.
You have a point, but I maintain there is a strain of that in the uber-hawk class now in charge.

I've heard radio interviews with people in the Sec. of State category in other nations describe meetings at international summits and they say there are two types of discussions: without the Americans present and with them. When we(them) are there, it's more of a "listen up people -- here's how it's gonna be."

I remember some press conferences back in '03 where the Dubbers was getting all haughty with the European press questions and it's a similar vibe.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K

Last edited by cmac2012; 05-23-2008 at 01:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 05-23-2008, 07:43 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmac2012 View Post
You have a point, but I maintain there is a strain of that in the uber-hawk class now in charge.
....
You have a point but I maintain that Left-wing pussies would have us believe that surrender is just a tool of negotiations.


B
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 05-23-2008, 05:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
I agree concerning Muslims and evolution. In point of fact, I have never heard of a wacko Christian fundamentalist who threatened harm to anybody who taught or believed or studied evolution, either.
B
You must have missed my last post where I mentioned the death threats against the judge who ruled in favor of evolution.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 05-23-2008, 05:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
You have a point but I maintain that Left-wing pussies would have us believe that surrender is just a tool of negotiations.


B
There's that S word again. For a long time people like you called it "cut and run" until it got old. I think it's time for you to come up with a new phrase again as the S word is getting old too.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 05-23-2008, 05:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by 450slcguy View Post
Only time will tell. They are a super secret societies and I believe they will be back for more soon enough. Countries like N. Korea and Iran do not honor agreements, they use them to stall and hide behind until their next surprise.
Our govt doesn't always honor agreements either or the constitution for that matter. The anti-ballistic missile treaty, torture, and warrantless wiretapping come to mind immediately. I'm sure there are more.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 05-23-2008, 06:01 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
There's that S word again. For a long time people like you called it "cut and run" until it got old. I think it's time for you to come up with a new phrase again as the S word is getting old too.
How about, "Cheese-eating surrender monkeys"?
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 05-23-2008, 06:07 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
Our govt doesn't always honor agreements either or the constitution for that matter. The anti-ballistic missile treaty, torture, and warrantless wiretapping come to mind immediately. I'm sure there are more.
Violate ABM treaty? Are you sure?
Torture, what torture?
Warrant-less wiretapping is illegal? Are you sure? Under all circumstances?

But I agree that the gov doesn't always act within the bounds of the constitution. If it did then there would be no need for a Supreme Court. Often non-gov entities and individuals don't know exactly what is or is not constitutional. If we all did did, then there would be no need for a Supreme Court in that instance, either. I wonder what the win-loss ratio v the gov is in Supreme Court cases. Is it constant over time? I have no idea but I'll bet somebody somewhere keeps up with those stats.

B

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2026 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page