Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 08-11-2011, 10:21 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
If you can't find common ground does that mean one of you is stupid or a dupe?

I don't think so.

Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 08-11-2011, 10:38 PM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
If you can't find common ground does that mean one of you is stupid or a dupe?

I don't think so.
Gosh I sure hope I did not say or imply that.

I hope I said he and I look at the same scene and see it differently.

If he had made factual claims or supplied referenced links I could go farther.

I heard him say, "this is how I see it."

I said, OK here are half-a-dozen factual claims, references, links.

I can't do much more after that.

Heck, I started my post saying Honus, my friend.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 08-11-2011, 10:48 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Oh hell, Marc Antony started in a similar vein. Then look what happened.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 08-11-2011, 11:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjh View Post
I agree that after 9-11 much of the nation supported Bush.

I'm not sure 'true-believers' on the right would consider me one of them. I tend to be more individualistic.

The graph from the Quarterly Journal of Economics gives a quantified reason for view the NY Times as a progressive paper.

The ombudsman at the NY Times has stated that the paper's editorial staff promotes a progressive agenda.

Their opinion writers: Maureen Down, Paul Krugman, etc make no pretense of being anything but progressives.

So.

Perhaps on this issue we can't find a common ground.

.
I tried to find links to support my recollection about the Times and the Post being Bush's lap dogs, but mostly what I found were left-wing websites saying the same thing without providing any good links. The one website that I thought would help - www.dailyhowler.com - won't let me search its archives. When I try a search, it gives a message saying that I need to jump through some hoops on my computer to make the search work. Life is too short for that, so I will just say that I distinctly recall my disgust at the Post's editorial page (the one on the left side of the paper, not the page with all the various columnists) and its support for the invasion of Iraq. It wasn't just their conclusion that offended, it was the way they stretched to reach it. The Times, of course, printed the embarrassing Judith Miller coverage of the case for the war. Here's an article about that: http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/media/features/9226/

I only read the Times every now and then, so I can't really say whether it's reputation as a left-leaning paper is deserved. Its coverage of Iraq, however, shows that whatever left-leaning tendencies it has, those tendencies get pushed to the side when they see an opportunity to get an edge on the competition.

Beyond that, I don't have much else to offer.

I have no idea what Botnst is talking about with the stuff about whether one of us is stupid or a dupe.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 08-11-2011, 11:47 PM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus View Post
I tried to find links to support my recollection about the Times and the Post being Bush's lap dogs,....
That's OK.

I'm trying to figure out who is Marc Anthony, who is Cleopatra, who is J. Caesar and I guess where the asp is located. Anyway I'll look at your comments.

As far as I am concerned we're doing fine.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 08-11-2011, 11:55 PM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus View Post
I tried to find links to support my recollection about the Times and the Post being Bush's lap dogs, but mostly what I found were left-wing websites saying the same thing without providing any good links. ....
We're good man, don't worry about it.

It's getting to be my bed-time.

Bush is a mystery to me.

Don't know how it made it where he did.

Take care.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 08-12-2011, 07:49 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
I was reading y'all's dialogue and recognized its genuineness without the seeming necessity of name-calling and accusations of indoctrination.

How is it possible?
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 08-12-2011, 09:30 AM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
I was reading y'all's dialogue and recognized its genuineness without the seeming necessity of name-calling and accusations of indoctrination.

How is it possible?
I suppose Honus dosen't think that I'm out to get him, just listening, thinking and speaking.

And he's comfortable enough with himself that we can talk about stuff without being concerned that something dreadful is going occur.

I mean if people stay within the bounds of propriety and decency why can't we talk about all sorts of stuff?
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 08-12-2011, 09:35 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus View Post
Sometimes I catch myself badmouthing our invasion of Iraq without really considering how disrespectful it must seem to those who have lost loved ones over there. It's a shame that it's come to that.
Worthy people can die for a poor cause. It's not the job of soldiers to play politics -- it's the job of politicians not to misuse those soldiers.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 08-12-2011, 10:07 AM
dynalow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,599
Tell Me. What were their names?

Tell me what were their names. Tell me what were their names.
Did you have a friend on the good Rueben James?
Tell me what were their names. Tell me what were their names.
Did you have a friend on the good Rueben James?

Well, many years have passed since those brave men are gone.
And those cold, icey waters are still and they're calm.
Many years have passed, but still I wonder why

The worst of men must fight, and the best of men must die.




http://www.defense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=14728

Politics. Politics.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/08/photo-of-obama-saluting-fallen-troops-questioned/1
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 08-12-2011, 12:07 PM
RichC's Avatar
Internal Error 404
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 963
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjh View Post
Progressive programs have their own litany of travesties and horrors that they visit upon us.

Many folks like to see their side as virtuous and their opponents as demonic.

Your story about socks describes how you went about making your market decision. My criteria differs.

I'm pretty sure that a reasoned, non-passionate analysis would show that both of our perspectives have strengths and weaknesses.

Big businesses (who I dislike because of their arrogance), big government, big unions, big educational agendas, big media, etc.

I dislike all of it. May be necessary but to sum it up as liberal=good and right-wing=bad. I don't think it works that way.

PS - Compassion is a very popular 'buzz word'. Personally I'd like to provide the means whereby people have the opportunity to improve if they wish to. That's why I pursue 'wealth-creation.' This concept is profoundly foreign to progressives. I'm not going to argue that republicans are much better but I'm not looking to either for what I want.

...
I agree, neither side is all good or all bad.
But we do have to make judgments on an individual basis.
I was not trying to paint any group with a broad brush.
I was trying to understand how someone could believe that large corporations could be considered a liberal idea.

What is this "wealth creation" you seem to hold above the concept of compassion ?
__________________

When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace.
Jimi Hendrix
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 08-12-2011, 12:10 PM
RichC's Avatar
Internal Error 404
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 963
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
I was reading y'all's dialogue and recognized its genuineness without the seeming necessity of name-calling and accusations of indoctrination.

How is it possible?
It is funny you said that.
Hopefully you can figure this one out on your own.
__________________

When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace.
Jimi Hendrix
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 08-12-2011, 12:57 PM
cmac2012's Avatar
Me, Myself, and I
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 37,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjh View Post
Your remarks above are thoughtful and kind.



I got rid of my TV a number of years ago. Worked well for me.

You're sure not going to get me to defend Fox or virtually any other media. To suggest to any of these folks that their job is objectivity would fall on deaf ears.

I question if the total amount of biased-derisive content from the media directed towards Obama approaches the level Bush experienced in his later years.

Bush was given the benefit of the doubt, to some extent, after 9-11 but was pummeled as time passed.
Bush got much more of a honeymoon than Obama. There was some friction before 9/11 but nothing like the wall of NO that was erected for Obama in Jan. '09. Bush sowed the seeds of the opposition to him many times. Rarely has a guy less qualified risen to that sort of power, here anyway.

On Obama, Republicans have lost their minds. The other twist regarding the Dover story was that a WH photog took a photo of Obama saluting at the ceremony - word is the Pentagon did not allow press coverage of the event at the request of 19 of the 31 families involved. A real tempest in a teapot:

http://articles.boston.com/2011-08-10/ae/29872885_1_releases-photos-media-coverage-pentagon

__________________
Te futueo et caballum tuum

1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K

Last edited by cmac2012; 08-12-2011 at 01:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 08-12-2011, 01:01 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
Worthy people can die for a poor cause. It's not the job of soldiers to play politics -- it's the job of politicians not to misuse those soldiers.
Succinct, clear, on point.
Well said.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 08-12-2011, 01:09 PM
cmac2012's Avatar
Me, Myself, and I
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 37,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
Worthy people can die for a poor cause. It's not the job of soldiers to play politics -- it's the job of politicians not to misuse those soldiers.
I agree with this but at some point, the moral compass of the average person is the last safeguard against tyranny or at least folly. One (possibly) will be called upon oneday to answer for what one has done.

__________________
Te futueo et caballum tuum

1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page