Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #646  
Old 12-17-2012, 11:37 PM
cmac2012's Avatar
Renaissances Dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 35,958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
It might help to have some actual data about the actual threat so that one could suggest actual solutions to actual problems.

Just saying.
I'm not opposed to the data you present, but you aim somewhere away from what we are looking at. Did data predict this incident? Or that of McVeigh, Koresh, and more? Thought experiments have value. Above you sneered at my abundance of psychology and paucity of facts. What kid these days or in your youth played war games by imitating knife fighting? Are you kidding? It was tommy-guns or western style revolver or rifle gunplay, all the time. No obscure psychology is required to note that a semi-auto rifle emboldens one to a greater degree than a knife or just might, maybe anyhow.

You ignored my speculation that the principle may have been able to hinder him sufficiently to be apprehended if all he had was a knife. Nothing wildly ignorant (to ignore) of facts in that opinion. And besides, it's a thought experiment, not a doctor's thesis.

Jeez . . .
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
In the data, I believe 'slaughter' is not addressed as a category but perhaps 'violent' encompasses it? What do you think?
No one I know of is suggesting that we can end violent behavior. Since no one is going to allow criminals to brandish 50 cal. Gatling guns on top of small pickups on the freeway and in the hood, we can conclude that we do, and will, enforce limits on personal firearm ownership and use. The question is, at least in part, should we perhaps revise those limits at this time?

__________________
Te futueo et caballum tuum

1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K

Last edited by cmac2012; 12-18-2012 at 01:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #647  
Old 12-18-2012, 01:04 AM
cmac2012's Avatar
Renaissances Dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 35,958
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwitchKitty View Post
If you like making fun of people for "conspiracy theory" you should google
"port arthur" conspiracy

There are a whole lot of people close to that incident who believe it was staged and can back their position.
First I heard of it. I read a bit about it. What I've seen so far isn't compelling.
__________________
Te futueo et caballum tuum

1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote
  #648  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:44 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmac2012 View Post
I'm not opposed to the data you present, but you aim somewhere away from what we are looking at. Did data predict this incident? Or that of McVeigh, Koresh, and more? Thought experiments have value. Above you sneered at my abundance of psychology and paucity of facts. What kid these days or in your youth played war games by imitating knife fighting? Are you kidding? It was tommy-guns or western style revolver or rifle gunplay, all the time. No obscure psychology is required to note that a semi-auto rifle emboldens one to a greater degree than a knife or just might, maybe anyhow.

You ignored my speculation that the principle may have been able to hinder him sufficiently to be apprehended if all he had was a knife. Nothing wildly ignorant (to ignore) of facts in that opinion. And besides, it's a thought experiment, not a doctor's thesis.

Jeez . . .

No one I know of is suggesting that we can end violent behavior. Since no one is going to allow criminals to brandish 50 cal. Gatling guns on top of small pickups on the freeway and in the hood, we can conclude that we do, and will, enforce limits on personal firearm ownership and use. The question is, at least in part, should we perhaps revise those limits at this time?
I wouldn't say I ignored your speculative suggestion. In my opinion the stats don't warrant even more governmental incursion into a constitutionally protected right. I understand that we probably wont agree on that.

Perhaps this is a great time to celebrate federalism, in which the states have the right to impose rules and regs that may differ from each other but fall within teh broad parameters of constitutional review.
Reply With Quote
  #649  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:48 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by my83300cd View Post
.... How many permitted, untrained, unprepared persons are now lugging pistols around?
What percent of them commit crimes with their pistols?
Reply With Quote
  #650  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:52 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
Now lets look at that by fatalities.
Couldn't find what you requested. Perhaps if you are interested you can find the stats.

I did find this interesting tidbit:
n the last decade (since 2000) the homicide rate declined to levels last seen in the mid-1960s
 The homicide rate doubled from the early 1960s to the late 1970s, increasing from 4.6 per 100,000 U.S. residents in 1962 to 9.7 per 100,000 by 1979 (figure 1). (See Methodology for information on rate calculations.)
 In 1980 the rate peaked at 10.2 per 100,000 and subsequently fell to 7.9 per 100,000 in 1984.
 The rate rose again in the late 1980s and early 1990s to another peak in 1991 of 9.8 per 100,000.
The homicide rate declined sharply from 9.3 homicides per 100,000 in 1992 to 4.8 homicides per 100,000 in 2010.
The number of homicides reached an all-time high of 24,703 homicides in 1991 then fell rapidly to 15,522 homicides by 1999

Note: Data are based on annual estimates of homicide from previously published versions of Crime in the United States. Data for 1989 to 2008 reflect updated homicide estimates from Crime in the United States, 2008. Data for 2009 and 2010 reflect updated homicide estimates from Crime in the United States, 2010.
Source: FBI, Uniform Crime Reports, 1950-2010. FIGURE 2
Number of homicide victims, 1950–2010

The number of homicides increased steadily from the early 1950s until the mid-1970s (figure 2).
Between 1999 and 2008, the number of homicides remained relatively constant, ranging from a low of 15,552 homicides in 1999 to a high of 17,030 homicides in 2006. These homicide numbers were still below those reported in the 1970s, when the number of reported homicides first rose above 20,000 (reaching 20,710 in 1974).
Reply With Quote
  #651  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:56 AM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,321
I don't think that there are ANY constitutional laws that could be passed that would stop this sort of thing. It was against the law to bring a firearm within 1,000 feet of a school and THAT really helped out.

The politicians are so full of themselves that they think they can pass a law to fix anything. I wonder if they ever stopped to think that their thousand foot law kept anyone from having a weopon to defend the kids with? They are too buisy moving us closer to European Socialism and decaying morality.
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #652  
Old 12-18-2012, 08:19 AM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
I agree with Twitchkitty.

History clearly demonstrates that the government steps through a process of control of private ownership of firearms. First is registry. Last is seizure. It has never gone the other way. Doesn't it make you curious why governments don't ever seek to increase the freedom of its citizens?

We measure congressional success by how many laws they pass. Does that not frighten you just a bit?
I can nearly guarantee that at least 75% of gun owners would become law breakers by refusing to register their guns.
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #653  
Old 12-18-2012, 08:19 AM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
I believe emotion will triumph over reason, and the government will take this "opportunity" to take away more liberty while promising more peace.

I am coming to grips with the reality that the country has changed. Freedom and liberty are no longer valued by the great mass of the populace. Security, safety, and having others provide for their needs ( wants/ demands) are the current desires.
Time for a new Constitutional Convention to officially bury the original Union and recognize the new reality.

It was a great country for 200 years or so. We couldn't keep it, so it is gone onto the dustbin of history.
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #654  
Old 12-18-2012, 08:21 AM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
I can nearly guarantee that at least 75% of gun owners would become law breakers by refusing to register their guns.
Why would you hope to make such a large portion of the population into criminals?
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #655  
Old 12-18-2012, 08:39 AM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
If we can have faddish platform shoes and wide lapels, or 2-toned Chevy Impalas we can have weapons fads.

I'll bet it's a fad. Explosives are easy to mix, obtain and use -- 1,000 Al Qaedstas can't all be geniuses, right? But the fad is to use firearms while explosives are so yesterday. Maybe we'll get lucky and have a blast.

If Americans got into a machete thing we'd do like Central Americans and hack at each other.
Explosives? That makes me think of the Weather Underground's Bill Ayers and his circle of friends...
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #656  
Old 12-18-2012, 08:52 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
I don't think that there are ANY constitutional laws that could be passed that would stop this sort of thing. It was against the law to bring a firearm within 1,000 feet of a school and THAT really helped out.

The politicians are so full of themselves that they think they can pass a law to fix anything. I wonder if they ever stopped to think that their thousand foot law kept anyone from having a weopon to defend the kids with? They are too buisy moving us closer to European Socialism and decaying morality.
The 1000 foot rule might not keep someone from getting close to a school with a gun but if caught at least they can be arrested.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #657  
Old 12-18-2012, 08:58 AM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
I believe emotion will triumph over reason, and the government will take this "opportunity" to take away more liberty while promising more peace.

I am coming to grips with the reality that the country has changed. Freedom and liberty are no longer valued by the great mass of the populace. Security, safety, and having others provide for their needs ( wants/ demands) are the current desires.
Time for a new Constitutional Convention to officially bury the original Union and recognize the new reality.

It was a great country for 200 years or so. We couldn't keep it, so it is gone onto the dustbin of history.
You're exactly correct! The gun grabbers don't even have the decency to wait until after the funerals to start on this.
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #658  
Old 12-18-2012, 09:00 AM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
The 1000 foot rule might not keep someone from getting close to a school with a gun but if caught at least they can be arrested.

Yes, and it means they can arrest someone who might have been armed and capable of stopping nuts like this. The nuts are totally willing to break that law. The people with the character to stop the bastid also have the character that causes them to obey the law and not be armed to protect their students.
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #659  
Old 12-18-2012, 09:13 AM
waterboarding w/medmech
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Coming to your hometown
Posts: 7,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jorn View Post
And who pays for that? When old Ronnie had to save some money in the 80's he closed all the mental hospitals and kicked them on the street. And here we are.
I've got news for you: the exodus of th ederanged from mental institutions started in the late 50s, early 60s. Thank Ken Kesey and all the other advocates for the reform of mental institutions. Instead of reform of the truly bad system n place, the mentally ill were shuffled off to the streets...
Reply With Quote
  #660  
Old 12-18-2012, 09:23 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix Arizona. Ex Durban R.S.A.
Posts: 6,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
The 1000 foot rule might not keep someone from getting close to a school with a gun but if caught at least they can be arrested.
I really fail to see how any rational person can assume that there is some value in this rule.
Oh, yes, you can arrest them of course, but to do that you'd have to have police officers stationed at every school checking everybody who comes within a thousand feet of it.

Never will be enough police so it's a nonsense rule to begin with. Not to mention the fact that as has been stated it simply prevents law abiding individuals who might have been able to stop whackjobs from doing so.

It is in fact a particularly stupid rule in my opinion.

- Peter.

__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark
Formerly...
2000 GMC Sonoma
1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021
2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels
1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles.
1984 123 200
1979 116 280S
1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
1971 108 280S
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page