Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #691  
Old 12-18-2012, 11:48 AM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by retmil46 View Post
Bull****. You completely misunderstood the point.

The argument being that when taking into account the two factors I mentioned, instead of a reasoned rational discussion and response to events such as this, we're even more likely, as a country, to have an emotional knee-jerk response that does nothing to address the problem, or even makes matters worse.

For example, as one poster already mentioned, the Patriot Act in response to 9/11.
so you think that armed teachers is a rational reaction? how about armored desks, and military training for all teaching staff?

how about brain scans for the whole population? does that sound like reasoned rational discussion? whats more reasoned and rational, evading the 2nd amendment issues at all and finding new ways to bring more weapons in as a threadbare sense of security, or actually discussing the differences between then and now, and how amendments can easily stand to be altered to reflect a much bigger country with different problems these days?

Totally agree on the patriot act.

__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #692  
Old 12-18-2012, 11:51 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
note to self:

Arguing with Mr. Dropnosky is a complete waste of time and should not be continued because he believes, without any substantive data, that random acts of violence against unarmed civilians will go down if he introduces legislation to control the supply side of the weapons.

This is despite ample evidence that very tight handgun laws in NY and CT do not prevent these occurrences.

FWIW, I'm not a second amendment RWNJ and couldn't care less if Mr. Dropnosky legislates the automatic handgun out of existence. I cannot carry one anyway due the laws of this state.

About two miles from here a DB with an illegal handgun walked into a pharmacy on a Sunday morning and executed the pharmacist, a young woman at the register, and two customers because he needed some crystal meth. Ask Mr. Dropnosky how his new laws worked out for those folks.

At least 4 dead in Medford pharmacy shooting - NYPOST.com
Reply With Quote
  #693  
Old 12-18-2012, 11:51 AM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
Switzerland and Israel both seem to have a lot of guns but not much gun violence. It seems their situation needs to be looked at to see why and how it apparently works so well.

Duh! Isn't it funny how it works that way? Both countries have a policy where virtually everyone serves in the military, gets training and proficiency. The bad guys in those countries know that doing something in the midst of all those guns and gunners will likely have serious and immediate consequences.

I remember seeing a young guy on a small motorcycle riding along next to me on the streets of Zurich with an UZI hanging on the back of the motorcycle.

In the airports of most of those countries it is VERY common to see police with a small, full automatic weopon on their person.

Along these lines, it's no coincidence that the crime rate has gone down since the widening trend toward concealed carry training and permits being issued in more and more states.
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #694  
Old 12-18-2012, 11:53 AM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
note to self:

Arguing with Mr. Dropnosky is a complete waste of time and should not be continued because he believes, without any substantive data, that random acts of violence against unarmed civilians will go down if he introduces legislation to control the supply side of the weapons.

This is despite ample evidence that very tight handgun laws in NY and CT do not prevent these occurrences.

FWIW, I'm not a second amendment RWNJ and couldn't care less if Mr. Dropnosky legislates the automatic handgun out of existence. I cannot carry one anyway due the laws of this state.

About two miles from here a DB with an illegal handgun walked into a pharmacy on a Sunday morning and executed the pharmacist, a young woman at the register, and two customers because he needed some crystal meth. Ask Mr. Dropnosky how his new laws worked out for those folks.

At least 4 dead in Medford pharmacy shooting - NYPOST.com

I'm disappointed in you Brian. You are normally a MUCH quicker study than this.
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #695  
Old 12-18-2012, 11:54 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
I'm disappointed in you Brian. You are normally a MUCH quicker study than this.
......LOL........excellent.
Reply With Quote
  #696  
Old 12-18-2012, 11:56 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by dropnosky View Post
a call to personal responsibility does what? how does that protect against a nutjob like in this situation?

I also have no need or desire to own weapons anymore. I stand to inherit a couple historic firearms, but I would happily surrender them if I believed that surrendering them would make it less likely that these types of atrocities can continue, which I do.

What drives me nuts is the spirit of no compromise, no discussion. As shown in this thread, when logical facts and examples of gun control effects on murder rates in other countries is demonstrated, the response is always that more guns are indeed the answer, not less. Same old story, different year.
Go ahead and write your will to transfer the guns to the police. That way they will not come into your possession. The cops will either melt them down or sell them to their officers for $5 each.

If more people would turn their guns into the police, the streets would be much safer. Only LEOs need guns. And a safer world, is what we are all after, right?
Reply With Quote
  #697  
Old 12-18-2012, 11:59 AM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
note to self:

Arguing with Mr. Dropnosky is a complete waste of time and should not be continued because he believes, without any substantive data, that random acts of violence against unarmed civilians will go down if he introduces legislation to control the supply side of the weapons.

This is despite ample evidence that very tight handgun laws in NY and CT do not prevent these occurrences.

FWIW, I'm not a second amendment RWNJ and couldn't care less if Mr. Dropnosky legislates the automatic handgun out of existence. I cannot carry one anyway due the laws of this state.

About two miles from here a DB with an illegal handgun walked into a pharmacy on a Sunday morning and executed the pharmacist, a young woman at the register, and two customers because he needed some crystal meth. Ask Mr. Dropnosky how his new laws worked out for those folks.

At least 4 dead in Medford pharmacy shooting - NYPOST.com
It didn't, they are dead.

However, when timmy the put upon 17 year old goes ape and wants to off his classmates with his dads 45, only to find that its gone as part of Mr. Dropnosky's laws, and he doesn't know how to get a gun, so chooses some other method that results in less people killed or no deaths at all, maybe rules of the kind I am proposing would have some value to you.

No solution will solve all the problems Brian, but it might do you good to actually consider ideas even if reprehensible to you for their potential merits, even if not complete and total for all uses of weapons.
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #698  
Old 12-18-2012, 11:59 AM
retmil46's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by dropnosky View Post
so you think that armed teachers is a rational reaction? how about armored desks, and military training for all teaching staff?

how about brain scans for the whole population? does that sound like reasoned rational discussion? whats more reasoned and rational, evading the 2nd amendment issues at all and finding new ways to bring more weapons in as a threadbare sense of security, or actually discussing the differences between then and now, and how amendments can easily stand to be altered to reflect a much bigger country with different problems these days?
Thank you for proving my point.

If you'd bothered to notice, I haven't advocated ANY of the ideas you mentioned above, in this thread.
__________________
Just say "NO" to Ethanol - Drive Diesel

Mitchell Oates
Mooresville, NC
'87 300D 212K miles
'87 300D 151K miles - R.I.P. 12/08
'05 Jeep Liberty CRD 67K miles
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club
Reply With Quote
  #699  
Old 12-18-2012, 12:01 PM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
I'm disappointed in you Brian. You are normally a MUCH quicker study than this.
oh boy, reason and analysis has entered the room. If it isn't mr emotion and the good ol days himself, back to pin issues on the president in some way, mark my words.
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #700  
Old 12-18-2012, 12:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix Arizona. Ex Durban R.S.A.
Posts: 6,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
Sorry..........I meant 3 over as in 23 mph in a 20 mph school zone.

I do find it curious that you don't carry anymore. The random acts of violence in stores, schools, etc. is not decreasing and you're a sitting duck if you're in the wrong place at the wrong time.

We cannot get a full carry here but I often muse if I would be better or worse if I had one.
Ah I understand now. Yes it's possible I guess but that just goes to show the stupidity of the thousand foot rule, or any other like it for that matter. I work in a school district, so carrying a gun on me would be unworkable as I have to enter many of 14 schools on a daily basis.

I don't carry outside of school because I just don't see the need. I'd so so if I felt it was necessary but having grown up in a far more violent society than the US, namely South Africa, the level of crime to which I was accustomed was off the charts worse than what exists here, unless of course you are in the worst of the worst areas like Detroit for example.

I'm not unaware of the reality of crime or the utility of handguns for personal protection, I just don't see the need for one in my situation and would not be able to carry one effectively any way on account of my work.

- Peter.
__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark
Formerly...
2000 GMC Sonoma
1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021
2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels
1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles.
1984 123 200
1979 116 280S
1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
1971 108 280S
Reply With Quote
  #701  
Old 12-18-2012, 12:04 PM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by retmil46 View Post
Thank you for proving my point.

If you'd bothered to notice, I haven't advocated ANY of the ideas you mentioned above, in this thread.

I have noticed that, those are some of the points brought up in this thread several times, along with others like myself spouting unachievable gun restriction goals.

I asked if you agree, not if you wrote them. Sounds like you don't
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #702  
Old 12-18-2012, 12:08 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by dropnosky View Post
It didn't, they are dead.

However, when timmy the put upon 17 year old goes ape and wants to off his classmates with his dads 45, only to find that its gone as part of Mr. Dropnosky's laws, and he doesn't know how to get a gun, so chooses some other method that results in less people killed or no deaths at all, maybe rules of the kind I am proposing would have some value to you.

No solution will solve all the problems Brian, but it might do you good to actually consider ideas even if reprehensible to you for their potential merits, even if not complete and total for all uses of weapons.
Exactly.

The scenario that you indicated is realistic and, if you could eliminate all handguns, including dads target shooting .45, your proposed solution would have merit to eliminate the very narrow scenario that you stated above.

I've certainly considered your idea and the idea itself is not reprehensible to me. Because you're unable to read what I post and process it, I'll say it again.........this time in bold:

I couldn't care less if Mr. Dropnosky's laws resulted in the elimination of all automatic handguns because in this state, I cannot legally carry one anyway.

The problem with your proposal is that it is a pipe dream. It's about as unrealistic as you could possible get in this country. Nobody is going to go for anything that restricts their ability to own a firearm. You'd be lucky to get gun registration in place in every state of the union. So, I wish you'd kindly quit with these over the top recommendations that have absolutely no basis in reality.

Like I originally said............"you and your kind"............all kinds of proposals...........all of them basically worthless in this society.
Reply With Quote
  #703  
Old 12-18-2012, 12:09 PM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuskyMan View Post
Go ahead and write your will to transfer the guns to the police. That way they will not come into your possession. The cops will either melt them down or sell them to their officers for $5 each.

If more people would turn their guns into the police, the streets would be much safer. Only LEOs need guns. And a safer world, is what we are all after, right?

The big point I was making that everyone seems to not be able to read, is that of all these mass shooting issues, the majority of the guns used were legally registered weapons from relatives or friends of the shooters that were stolen.

Stands to reason, that with those rounded up, you might see a difference in weapon accessibility for a suburbanite shooter, and either a change or heart, or a change in tactics. Would he still be able to kill people if he desires? Sure, what I advocate, is making it slightly less easy

I doubt the guns I would get would be of much use, two are japanese officer pistols, and the other a 45, but I would still be willing to turn them in, just the same.
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #704  
Old 12-18-2012, 12:09 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 52,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
You do understand that all the gun regulations that you could possibly dream up would not have stopped this tragedy?

You also understand that CT has some of the toughest gun laws in the country and it had absolutely no effect in stopping this tragedy?

So, go ahead and propose all kinds of regulations that will make it more difficult for the average person to have a gun. After you do that, don't be at all surprised if the ongoing random violence against unarmed assembled masses continues unabated.
How about the one where guns not in use are required to be stored in a certified gun safe? That might have stopped him.
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #705  
Old 12-18-2012, 12:12 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 52,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwitchKitty View Post
This thread is intellectually dishonest. The premise that it is time to discuss gun control translates to:

"We all know that the gun control laws have already been written some time ago and we have been waiting for an excellent opportunity like this to ram them down your throat again."

"Discuss" translates to "shut up and listen, we don't give a damn what you think". "We write the laws and you live by them".
As with some other topics with conservatives, you refuse to deal with them until it is too late and then you come out on the loosing end of the stick. Had you dealt with the issue before it hit critical mass perhaps you could have gotten out ahead of the issue.

__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page