Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion > Alternative Fuels

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 03-23-2013, 11:10 AM
eatont9999's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidlee View Post
How long have you been running that mix in you car?
I have been running small amounts since I bought the car a year ago but in the last 5 months, I have started running more WMO and high concentrations of it. I know it is not a long period of time but like I said, it can save you a lot of money and if ever I had a problem with the IP or injectors, they can be replaced for a nominal amount of cash in comparison.

People lament over the engine consuming oil as fuel but I ask you to take a look at the intake of your turbo. Looks kinda like used engine oil in it, right? Well, even though the crank case oil vapors are filtered through the oil separator, oil vapor still gets into the engine and burnt as fuel. Burning the oil through the intake is the worst possible way to efficiently burn the oil because it is introduced into the cylinder at improper timing and not atomized like the fuel introduced through the injection system. Coking on the intake valves and exhaust valves can occur when the fuel is not burned properly.

I have done extensive research on burning WMO in Diesel engines and I believe that the only unknown is the effect on the IP. I have heard arguments that claim the carbon deposits wear out the IP and on the flip-side, I have heard arguments that the carbon is a lubricating agent same as the graphite lube in locks, etc. I take an economic point of view and I realize that if I save thousands of dollars and have to replace an engine for $250 on my time, I win in the end.

__________________
1991 F250 super-cab 7.3 IDI. (rebuilt by me) Banks Sidewinder turbo, hydroboost brakes, new IP and injectors.
2003 S430 - 107K
1983 300SD - Tanoshii - mostly restored ~400K+.
1983 300SD - Good interior. Engine finally tamed ~250K.
Monark Nozzle Install Video - http://tinyurl.com/ptd2tge
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-26-2013, 02:45 PM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 56,445
Quote:
Originally Posted by eatont9999 View Post
I have been running small amounts since I bought the car a year ago but in the last 5 months, I have started running more WMO and high concentrations of it. I know it is not a long period of time but like I said, it can save you a lot of money and if ever I had a problem with the IP or injectors, they can be replaced for a nominal amount of cash in comparison.

People lament over the engine consuming oil as fuel but I ask you to take a look at the intake of your turbo. Looks kinda like used engine oil in it, right? Well, even though the crank case oil vapors are filtered through the oil separator, oil vapor still gets into the engine and burnt as fuel. Burning the oil through the intake is the worst possible way to efficiently burn the oil because it is introduced into the cylinder at improper timing and not atomized like the fuel introduced through the injection system. Coking on the intake valves and exhaust valves can occur when the fuel is not burned properly.

I have done extensive research on burning WMO in Diesel engines and I believe that the only unknown is the effect on the IP. I have heard arguments that claim the carbon deposits wear out the IP and on the flip-side, I have heard arguments that the carbon is a lubricating agent same as the graphite lube in locks, etc. I take an economic point of view and I realize that if I save thousands of dollars and have to replace an engine for $250 on my time, I win in the end.
Bending science a little?
Do you really believe that Oil Vapor carries any particles that need to be Filtered?
The Vaporized Oil particles burn more easily because they are smaller than the Atomized Fuel that comes out of the Fuel Injector and Engine Oil has a Higher Cetane rate then Diesel Fuel so it ignites easier once it starts.

In order for the Oil Vapor to preignite like let us say Starting Fluid it has to be volotile; and it is only slighly more volotile than Diesel Fuel; and there also has to be enough Oil Vapor to stustain Combustion. Meaning you need a large Volume of Oil Vapor.

So it would take a whole lot of Oil Vapor at Engine cranking speeds for it to ignite. And, at cranking speeds there is no Blow-by and thus no Oil Vaopr to ignite.

The issue with buring WVO is that there is stuff in it like detergent and acids that no one should be attempting to burn in an Engine.

If you are simply out to save money and not worry about the longivity of the Engine and Fuel System then of course none of the above matters.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-26-2013, 03:17 PM
greazzer's Avatar
dieselinjectorguru.com
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Still in the Palmetto State
Posts: 6,598
The issue with buring WVO is that there is stuff in it like detergent and acids that no one should be attempting to burn in an Engine.

What is the Ph level of diesel: 5.6 at 25 C.

What is the Ph level of cooking oil: ?

Answer: Actually, you can't measure the pH of vegetable oil because it doesn't have one! pH is a measure of the hydrogen ion concentration in an aqueous solution (water). Because there is no water in vegetable oil, there is no pH value. However, if you did some fancy chemistry, it's much closer to 7, that being neutral. It's really not acidic.

So, I don't see how it is more acidic or it contains "acids". What detergents also ?
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 03-26-2013, 07:25 PM
ROLLGUY's Avatar
ROLLGUY
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by greazzer View Post
The issue with buring WVO is that there is stuff in it like detergent and acids that no one should be attempting to burn in an Engine.

What is the Ph level of diesel: 5.6 at 25 C.

What is the Ph level of cooking oil: ?

Answer: Actually, you can't measure the pH of vegetable oil because it doesn't have one! pH is a measure of the hydrogen ion concentration in an aqueous solution (water). Because there is no water in vegetable oil, there is no pH value. However, if you did some fancy chemistry, it's much closer to 7, that being neutral. It's really not acidic.

So, I don't see how it is more acidic or it contains "acids". What detergents also ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel911 View Post


The issue with buring WVO is that there is stuff in it like detergent and acids that no one should be attempting to burn in an Engine.
I think Diesel911 meant WMO not WVO
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 03-26-2013, 08:26 PM
greazzer's Avatar
dieselinjectorguru.com
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Still in the Palmetto State
Posts: 6,598
Oopps, my bad then.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 03-27-2013, 12:25 AM
eatont9999's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel911 View Post
Bending science a little?
Do you really believe that Oil Vapor carries any particles that need to be Filtered?
The Vaporized Oil particles burn more easily because they are smaller than the Atomized Fuel that comes out of the Fuel Injector and Engine Oil has a Higher Cetane rate then Diesel Fuel so it ignites easier once it starts.

In order for the Oil Vapor to preignite like let us say Starting Fluid it has to be volotile; and it is only slighly more volotile than Diesel Fuel; and there also has to be enough Oil Vapor to stustain Combustion. Meaning you need a large Volume of Oil Vapor.

So it would take a whole lot of Oil Vapor at Engine cranking speeds for it to ignite. And, at cranking speeds there is no Blow-by and thus no Oil Vaopr to ignite.

The issue with buring WVO is that there is stuff in it like detergent and acids that no one should be attempting to burn in an Engine.

If you are simply out to save money and not worry about the longivity of the Engine and Fuel System then of course none of the above matters.
I'm not talking about oil vapor being ignited during startup. I'm talking about oil vapor being present in the cylinder beginning on the intake stroke The oil coats the cylinder, walls and valves before ignition occurs. Oil in contact with a surface cannot burn well due to lack of oxygen exposure and the direct contact with a colder surface during ignition. This, I believe, leads to added coking and or carbon deposits.

My original point is that the engine has consumed by means of intake air supply, crankcase oil, and burnt it as fuel since the engine was manufactured. All doing so by design. Not to mention carbon deposit-rich exhaust vapors.

Secondly, the vaporized oil contains the exact same chemicals and small particulate that is in the oil in your crank case. The oil is vaporized, not fractured or distilled. Take a look at what is in your PCV hose and if you see pitch black oil residue, you are looking at the same stuff that is in the crankcase. Carbon deposits, chemicals, etc. I do not believe the vapor is any different than the oil itself and it is large enough to carry through the carbon deposits, etc that you are concerned about.
__________________
1991 F250 super-cab 7.3 IDI. (rebuilt by me) Banks Sidewinder turbo, hydroboost brakes, new IP and injectors.
2003 S430 - 107K
1983 300SD - Tanoshii - mostly restored ~400K+.
1983 300SD - Good interior. Engine finally tamed ~250K.
Monark Nozzle Install Video - http://tinyurl.com/ptd2tge
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 03-30-2013, 02:58 PM
Ghoti's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Springfield, Oregon
Posts: 87
Kastoo's Guide to Mercedes Diesel Motors says, "Do it".
__________________
2004 E320 Wagon W211
2000 CLK430 Convertible W208
1985 300SD W126
1983 300D W123
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 03-31-2013, 11:35 AM
funola's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by eatont9999 View Post
I'm not talking about oil vapor being ignited during startup. I'm talking about oil vapor being present in the cylinder beginning on the intake stroke The oil coats the cylinder, walls and valves before ignition occurs. Oil in contact with a surface cannot burn well due to lack of oxygen exposure and the direct contact with a colder surface during ignition. This, I believe, leads to added coking and or carbon deposits.

My original point is that the engine has consumed by means of intake air supply, crankcase oil, and burnt it as fuel since the engine was manufactured. All doing so by design. Not to mention carbon deposit-rich exhaust vapors.

Secondly, the vaporized oil contains the exact same chemicals and small particulate that is in the oil in your crank case. The oil is vaporized, not fractured or distilled. Take a look at what is in your PCV hose and if you see pitch black oil residue, you are looking at the same stuff that is in the crankcase. Carbon deposits, chemicals, etc. I do not believe the vapor is any different than the oil itself and it is large enough to carry through the carbon deposits, etc that you are concerned about.
I agree engine oil vapor is not much different than engine oil, composition wise. The difference is the vapor goes directly into the combustion chamber and not through your injection pump/ injectors.
__________________
85 300D turbo pristine w 157k when purchased 167,870 July 2025
83 300 D turbo 297K runs great. SOLD!
83 240D 4 spd manual- parted out then junked
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 03-31-2013, 05:56 PM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,432
FYI

The correct term is unregulated fuel = fuel not entering the combustion chamber through the injector.

This topic is thoroughly covered in the following thread.

Run away diesel, why does it happen?
Run away diesel, why does it happen? - PeachParts Mercedes ShopForum

The combustion chamber is very forgiving of particulate, many orders of magnitude beyond the injection pump or injectors.

.
__________________
ASE Master Mechanic
https://whunter.carrd.co/

Prototype R&D/testing:
Thermal & Aerodynamic System Engineering (TASE) Senior vehicle instrumentation technician.
Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH).
Dynamometer.
Heat exchanger durability.
HV-A/C Climate Control.
Vehicle build.
Fleet Durability
Technical Quality Auditor.
Automotive Technical Writer

1985 300SD
1983 300D
2003 Volvo V70

https://www.boldegoist.com/
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 05-22-2013, 01:02 AM
Just Benz'n
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: idaho
Posts: 153
i just started doing this ... in a 617 in a mazda pickup .
im pumping the wmo through a
screen > gearpump > 5 micron fiber filter > 10 micron absolute filter / water seperator
and them mixing about 1 to 6 with diesel .

i notice more smoke when its cold .. but not a lot more .

__________________
current fleet
Ford f350 dully 7.3L 1990 . ats turbo , zf5
Mazda 4x4 b2600 with 617 20-26 mpg
Past fleet
1983 240D w123 232k 25-30 MPG
1984 Ford f250,1979 ford 150 300-6 (sold@ 251K )
81 300D, 79 240D , 2x 76 300D ,74 240D , 2x 89 grand prix , 85 grand fury , and several other fords

Custom machine shop work ..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page