![]() |
|
|
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with Scott Longston. Wonder if it would be a good idea to put all oil-related threads into their own forum?
__________________
Bob Roe Lehigh Valley PA USA 1973 Olds 88, 1972 MB 280SE, 1978 Datsun 280Z, 1971 Ford T-Bird, 1972 Olds 88, 1983 Nissan Sentra, 1985 Sentra, 1973 230.6, 1990 Acura Integra, 1991 Volvo 940GLE wagon, 1983 300SD, 1984 300SD, 1995 Subaru Legacy L wagon, 2002 Mountaineer, 1991 300TE wagon, 2008 Murano, 2007 R320CDI 4Matic 52K, some Hyundai, 2008 BMW 535xi wagon, all gone... currently 2007 Honda Odyssey Touring, 2014 E350 4matic |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
I hate to throw more oil on the fire, but Mobil's website says that Mobil 1 is compatible with gasoline and diesel engines a number of times.
I see that Mercedes-Benz recommends Mobil 1 on their newer products, so that's promising. Also, modern Mobil 1 more than likely exceeds the requirements of the 80s and earlier passenger car diesels. -Joe |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
I think if you look at ANY brand synthetic, you will see a "C" rating. Whether or not this oil is up to Mercedes latest standards, I don't know. The newer FSS cars probaly have stricter standards. Oil ratings do become absolete over time. Obviously at some point a CH rated oil will be replaced by CI. This doesn't mean your SOL if your car originally called for CH, because the CI would superceed it.
__________________
1999 MB SL500 (110,000 mi) 2004 Volvo V70 2.5T (220,000 mi) 2014 Tesla Model S 85 (136,000 mi) MBCA member |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The oil debate again What do you think of this | dpbrowne | Diesel Discussion | 101 | 04-01-2005 02:33 PM |
Kerry was wrong about the war. | boneheaddoctor | Off-Topic Discussion | 8 | 11-19-2004 02:05 PM |
The great confusion at Mobil | loubapache | Tech Help | 61 | 06-15-2002 08:00 PM |