|
|
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
What do I do with my steam engine?
__________________
DJ 84 300D Turbodiesel 190K with 4 speed manual sold in 03/2012 |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Jimmy L. '05 Acura TL 6MT 2001 ML430 My Spare Gone: '95 E300 188K "Batmobile" Texas Unfriendly Black '85 300TD 235K "The Wagon" Texas Friendly White '80 240D 154K "China" Scar engine installed '81 300TD 240K "Smash" '80 240D 230K "The Squash" '81 240D 293K"Scar" Rear ended harder than Elton John |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Really, they tried that
Originally Posted by tangofox007 View Post
They tried "spinning" engines in aircraft in the early days. There was a bit of a problem with the gyroscopic effect. They really didn't just "try" it. All large aircraft engines on commercial passenger as well as all aircraft in the AirForce, up too the Jet engine, were of the "radial" type and really were spinning engines
__________________
Junqueyardjim Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance. The only thing it cannot be is moderately important. C.S. Lewis 1983 Mercedes W123 240D 4 Speed 285,000 on the road with a 617 turbo, beautiful butter yellow, license plate # 83 240D INDIANA 2003 Jaguar Type X, AWD. beautiful, good mileage, Mom's car, but I won't let her drive it! |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
On the majority of aircraft with radial engines, the engine was mounted to the airframe and the propeller was mounted to the crankshaft. So the engine remained fixed and the crankshaft rotated. But there was a model or two in the early years that had the crankshaft mounted to the airframe and the prop mounted to the engine, so that the crank was fixed and the entire engine rotated. But that was not the case in the vast majority of radial engine applications. A spinning prop creates enough of a problem due to gyroscopic issues. I suspect that, if you got a R-4360 spinning, you would have to throttle back to idle before every turn!!! |
Bookmarks |
|
|