Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2009, 04:25 PM
blackestate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 948
Alignment issue

Took the 82 in for an alignment today. I understand very little about this.
They said that they can not get it in all of the way.
Here are the numbers.
Left Right
-0.7 Camber 0.3
10.8 Caster 11.5
.23 Toe .19

He can not see anything wrong. It is not out by much. As long as it does not wear tires, I am tempted to leave it alone.
If it wears tires, which bushings are bad?

thanks
Doug

__________________
83 300SD Dark Silver Dark brown inside
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2009, 04:36 PM
79Mercy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,131
take it to the dealer, they'll get it perfect.
__________________
1985 300TD Turbo Euro-wagon
1979 280CE 225,200 miles
1985 300D Turbo 264,000 miles
1976 240D 190,000 miles
1979 300TD 220,000

GONE but not forgotten
1976 300D 195,300 miles
1983 300D Turbo 175,000 miles

http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...e485-1-2-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2009, 05:09 PM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,241
Was the alignment done on a car with old suspension rubber parts or was it done after replacing the rubber bushings?
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-29-2009, 05:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackestate View Post
If it wears tires, which bushings are bad?
The upper control arm bushings are notorious for sagging and causing negative camber. (Meaning that the top of the tire leans inboard.)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-29-2009, 05:16 PM
blackestate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 948
I did not replace any rubber bushings.
__________________
83 300SD Dark Silver Dark brown inside
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-29-2009, 09:53 PM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackestate View Post
I did not replace any rubber bushings.
Mercedes might not be able to do a better job if it has the old rubber on it.
I attempted/did my own alignment and I wish my specs were as close as yours (with all new rubber bushings and replaced worn parts).

As off spec as it is I have been driving on all kinds of roads and speeds and it seems OK and so far no noticable abnormal Tire wear and no shaking.

I think as long as your Tires don't have a problem and the Car tracks well when driving it should be OK.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-29-2009, 09:55 PM
curtludwig's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by tangofox007 View Post
The upper control arm bushings are notorious for sagging and causing negative camber. (Meaning that the top of the tire leans inboard.)
That helps me some. I did UCAs last fall and didn't get a new alignment, the tires have worn on the outer edge now. So the last alignment was spoiled with my new UCAs and I need a new alignment (that last part I already knew...)
__________________
Sadly Benz-less
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-30-2009, 12:27 AM
blackestate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 948
car has a slight pull to the right. I will see what happens as far as wear goes. Already did one front end, Not really excited to do another...
__________________
83 300SD Dark Silver Dark brown inside
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-30-2009, 01:52 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,281
But think of the satisfaction in knowing it will last a long time and not wear out the tires...
There really are no shortcuts on this.... do keep the toe in set regularly in the meantime..
you can do this yourself... lots of threads about it in archives...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-30-2009, 02:21 AM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,241
Do you know if the readings they gave are viewed from some one sitting in the Drivers seat or the view looking at front of the car when it comes to Left or Right?

Left Right
-0.7 Camber 0.3
10.8 Caster 11.5
.23 Toe .19

Did they run out of threads for adjustment down by the Guide Rod and the Guide Rod mpunt?
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-30-2009, 11:25 PM
blackestate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 948
I would assume sitting in the car. They said both wheels in effect were leaning to the right causing the pull to the right.
Found an issue tonight, see the thread on my vibration issue, and see if that would cause it?
__________________
83 300SD Dark Silver Dark brown inside
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-01-2009, 01:30 AM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackestate View Post
I would assume sitting in the car. They said both wheels in effect were leaning to the right causing the pull to the right.
Found an issue tonight, see the thread on my vibration issue, and see if that would cause it?
I was just curious as the Camber adustment down were ther Lower Control Arm is with the Eccentric plate/bolt does not have much of a range to it. But, adjusting there effects the Caster and adjusting the Caster with down by the Guide Rod had an effect on the Chamber.
The Guide Rod adjustment is mainly responsiable for the Caster Adjustment and due to a lot of threads it an adjustments there can give you a greater range of adjustment on the Chamber, but you may sacrafice the Caster adjustment (out of spec Caster is not as likely to cause Tire wear problems).

I ended up with the Wheels in a similar situation except that in order to get the Camber as close as I could (so it would not eat up the Tires) I had to reduce the Caster to the 7-8 range (around town it steers easier and still functions OK on the Freeway).
In reducing the Caster to get the Chamber I ran out of adjustment down by the Guide Rod (to reduce the Caster you shorten the length of the Guide Rod).
But, I in my case I suffered damage when I hit a 3-4 inch high Island on the Front Drivers side hard enough that it ruined the Rim on that side and cracked the Rear Trailing Arm on that side.
On the Passanger side I had to do considerable Beating to get the rusted in Eccentric Bolt out of the Control Arm Bushing.
So it could be in my case the Suspension Mounting Points have taken a beating; making it difficult to adjust correctly.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-01-2009, 09:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel911 View Post
I was just curious as the Camber adustment down were ther Lower Control Arm is with the Eccentric plate/bolt does not have much of a range to it.
Sometimes the range of adjustment is not adequate to overcome sagging bushings (especially UCA's) and worn ball joints.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-01-2009, 09:36 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackestate View Post
I would assume sitting in the car. They said both wheels in effect were leaning to the right causing the pull to the right.
He's correct. You've got positive camber on the right wheel which is not acceptable. The maximum number is zero and it's preferable to have -.5° negative (similar to the LF wheel).

Why didn't they align it?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-01-2009, 12:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,281
I think this negative camber was made famous by John DeLorean...when he was a bigwig at GM he drove his Mercedes into their shop and asked what it was that made it handle differently from the GM cars... if I remember correctly... it was this negative camber..which got incorporated into the Monte Carlo suspension.. about 1970 I think.. my aunt had one of those cars and it really did feel different...and NICE...it floated compared to most other cars..
Or I could just be making this whole thing up....

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page