![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm considering buying either an '06 E320 CDI or an '07 E320 CDI. The '06 has the inline 6 and the '07 the new Bluetec V-6. I would certainly appreciate any comments regarding the differences in mileage/smoothness/reliability/experiences between these two engines. Also, does the '06 CDI have the 7 speed automatic transmission? I believe the '07 CDI comes with the 7 speed trans. THANKS for all your input!!!
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Inline is always better.
__________________
1999 w140, quit voting to old, and to old to fight, a god damned veteran, deutschland deutschland uber alles uber alles in der welt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
X2 - that's what I have always found in diesels in general, but not familular with either of those . . .
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The 06 has the 5spd 722.6 trans and SBC brake system. MB has warrantied SBC for 10 yrs from date put in service due to problems. Proven I6 CDI engine and trans.
The 07 should have the 7spd 722.9 trans and SBC was dropped. New V6 engine design; not AdBlue. Many internal components designed to be repalced in pairs. Dot 9 trans had some early issues (04?) but seems reliable now. I've been looking mainly at 06's myself, although would take an 07 if the right deal came along. No exprience concerning the driving differences.
__________________
Terry Allison N. Calif. & Boca Chica, Panama 09' E320 Bluetec 77k (USA) 09' Hyundai Santa Fe Diesel 48k (S.A.) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I've driven both. Both are very smooth, but the V6 is quieter. The I6 has quite a bit of diesel injection rattle at around 1500RPM - it is noisier than the old OM606, for example. The V6 is almost completely silent at all RPM and throttle settings - noone would ever guess it is diesel. Power and fuel economy are about the same.
No idea whether one is more reliable than the other. Haven't seen any discussion here of problems on either. Personally, I'd purchase whichever one I found in my favorite color, or had the lowest mileage, or whatever it is that turns your crank on a used car. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
[QUOTE=TMAllison;2217999]The 06 has the SBC brake system. MB has warrantied SBC for 10 yrs from date put in service due to problems.
The 07 should have the 7spd 722.9 trans and SBC was dropped. QUOTE] Is it practical to upgrade the 06 SBC brake system to the 07 design? What would be involved?
__________________
Charles 1983 300D, bought new, 215k+ miles, donated to Purple Hearts veterans charity but I have parts for sale: http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/mercedes-benz-cars-sale/296386-fs-1-owner-83-mb-300d-turbo-rebuild-parts.html |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
[QUOTE=Cr from Texas;2218459]
Quote:
![]()
__________________
------------------------------------------ Aquilae non capunt muscas! (Eagles don't hunt flies!) 1979 300SD Black/Black MBtex239000mi 1983 300TD euro-NA. White/Olive Cloth-MBtex 201000mi. Fleet car of the USA embassy in Morocco 1983 240D Labrador Blue/Blue MBtex 161000mi |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I don't figure they'd put the "BLUETEC" label on the trunk badge of truth if it didn't have urea injection. And so there's definitely E320 bluetecs in the states.
Since I'm not a fan of "so quiet you can't tell it's a diesel" and not a fan of urea injection and not a fan of any additional electronic complications, I'd go for the CDI instead of the newer model every time. But that's just me. I tend to suspect older models are almost in every case more long-term "million miles" capable than the next replacement will be. Another point in favor of the older design to me but others have complete confidence in the new stuff. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
![]() http://portland.craigslist.org/mlt/ctd/1207483187.html http://portland.craigslist.org/wsc/ctd/1196728212.html http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/ctd/1208762734.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all the input, everybody. I really didn't mean to start a major argument. I appreciate all the positive input. I will discuss all this with my MBZ mechanic. As always, THEY are the ones who see these cars on a frequent basis and know the good and bad.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
[QUOTE=Cr from Texas;2218459]
Quote:
__________________
Charles 1983 300D, bought new, 215k+ miles, donated to Purple Hearts veterans charity but I have parts for sale: http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=296386 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
For like the 5th time, there are NO E320 Bluetec's in the USA with AdBlue (urea injection) up through the 09 model year. Zip, Nada, Nein.
That does not mean there aren't E320 Bluetecs WITHOUT AdBlue available. There are GL, ML and R320 Bluetecs WITH AdBlue in the US that have been avail for a year or two. NO E's. I would guess that getting rid of SBC would be a hardware and software nightmare.
__________________
Terry Allison N. Calif. & Boca Chica, Panama 09' E320 Bluetec 77k (USA) 09' Hyundai Santa Fe Diesel 48k (S.A.) |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
I bet they are both equally durable.....MB does know what they are doing......but I bet the inline engine is easier to work on.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life- ![]() '15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800) '17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k) '09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k) '13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k) '01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km) '16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k) |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Wasn't the V6 the first model to have the urea injection? Might be something to consider not having to worry about with the "06 and earlier models.
__________________
Dan 2005 E320 CDI - 246k 1987 300SDL TD05-16g, Herlevi pump, Elbe manifold, 2.47 LSD - 213k Past: 1987 300D - 264k ![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|