![]() |
|
|
|
|
View Poll Results: Is it worthwhile making an OM617 non turbo rebuild thread? | |||
No! Not another bloody engine rebuild thread |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 3.33% |
I couldn't care less |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Oh go on then if it makes you happy |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 30.00% |
Yes please I've got a non turbo OM617 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 63.33% |
What is the point of this poll - do whatever you want |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 3.33% |
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Would an OM617 non turbo rebuild thread be worthwhile?
G'day Folks,
I've recently been rebuilding the engine on my 1981 W123 300D - that's an OM617 non turbo engine. As I'm in the habit of taking lots of photographs as I work I've got quite a few that could be made into a thread if it was felt to be worthwhile... If the general consensus is that people would like to see this - I'll make the effort - otherwise I won't bother!
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver 1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone 1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy! 1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior ![]() Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits! |
Bookmarks |
|
|