Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-22-2011, 09:06 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 27,022
ok
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 560SL convertible
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
2005 Dodge Sprinter 2500 158"WB
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-22-2011, 09:13 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by vstech View Post
ok
Thanks for the thread rename John - it explains a bit more about the content now!
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-09-2011, 04:59 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
For a different problem I measured the positions of the cam lobes

Here is data for the position of the cam lobes.

I've only got a 150mm vernier caliper so they are not as good as they could be - there is an accumulative error in the summation of the individual distances for the new cam shaft - the old one I've got worked out better - that was pure luck!
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Distances between lobes on OM617 camshafts.pdf (35.7 KB, 355 views)
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-27-2011, 02:48 PM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
I've made some mistakes with this...

...that I'd like to correct.

In post 20 I've got the clearance wrong.

The clearance was measured directly as described in the post.

I measured the "drop" of the valve from its position in the valve seat to the piston crown. This was:-

Inlet (cylinder #1) 3.18mm
Exhaust (cylinder #1) 2.88mm

This is the clearance.

I was trying to find out how thick the head gasket was when fitted... I'm interested in this because the piston on my engine sticks out above the surface of the block by 0.85mm. The head gasket is the only thing that stops disaster!


This roughly drawn picture above is meant to show that the valves are recessed into the head.

In my engine they were:-

Inlet (cylinder #1) 1.05 mm
Exhaust (cylinder #1) 0.8 mm

The recess in the piston crown was measured to be 1.25mm



So adding the distance of the recess in the crown of the piston to the depth at which the valves have been recessed into the head you get

Inlet (cylinder #1) 1.05 mm + 1.25mm = 2.3 mm
Exhaust (cylinder #1) 0.8 mm + 1.25mm = 2.05 mm

So subtracting the combined values of the recesses the distance between the top of the piston and the head is either

Inlet (cylinder #1) 3.18 mm - 2.3 mm = 0.88mm

or

Exhaust (cylinder #1) 2.88 mm - 2.05 mm = 0.83mm

As said before 0.05mm has been "lost" some where in the measuring process. This is equal to the precision of my depth gauge...

So after all that I can estimate my head gasket thickness when fitted to be somewhere between 1.68 mm and 1.73mm on a cold engine! The uncompressed head gasket thickness was 2.2mm.

So a head gasket seems to be compressed by about 20% of its thickness when fitted.
Attached Thumbnails
OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-valve-piston-clearance.jpg   OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-om617-non-turbo-piston.jpg  
Attached Files
File Type: pdf OM617 non turbo cam measurements.pdf (23.9 KB, 301 views)
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!

Last edited by Stretch; 11-27-2011 at 03:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-28-2011, 05:45 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Timing chain elongation calculations

I've been wondering about the odd numbers of offset correction for timing chain elongation described in the FSM (chap 5-215). I've done some calculations that suggest that the smallest offset key is pretty useless...

Well it is pretty useless to correct for 4 degrees - it is better for 6!

Take a look at this image of the PDF I've attached.



The diameter of the hole in the camshaft sprocket on my OM617 non turbo is most definitely 28mm - but it looks like Mercedes have designed the offset keys for a 30mm diameter. Does anyone know if the turbo cam has a 30mm diameter hole in the camshaft sprocket?



And the size of the Woodruff key / offset key slot is 4mm



I've measured the PCD of the camshaft sprocket and I reckon it is 119mm. I've used this value to calculate the circumference of a "circle" running around the sprocket where I expect the chain to be resting. This circumference was then proportionally divided up for each angle of elongation => i.e. circumference of PCD circle divided by 360 degrees multiplied by "degree of elongation at camshaft sprocket"



It is nice to see that roughly speaking if you have one degree of elongation measured at the crank that is equivalent to about 0.5mm linear elongation.
Attached Thumbnails
OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-om617chainelongation.jpg   OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-om617-camshaft-sprocket2.jpg   OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-om617-camshaft-cog-woodruff-key-width.jpg   OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-om617-camshaft-cog-inner-diameter.jpg  
Attached Files
File Type: pdf OM617chainelongation.pdf (16.1 KB, 340 views)
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!

Last edited by Stretch; 11-28-2011 at 06:11 AM. Reason: I made a correction
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-28-2011, 03:12 PM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
May be a picture will help demonstrate...

...the difference between the calculations and the data in the FSM?

Attached Thumbnails
OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-snapshot28.png  
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page