Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 01-12-2011, 01:42 PM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
Depends on whether you're using the word "stretch" in the literal sense, where the metal parts have been stressed beyond their yield point / plastic deformation limit (unlikely), or meaning that due to wear there is more slop in the pin/hole interface allowing the chain to be longer.

If a chain were to actually stretch the metal, you're on the edge of disaster, probably would shear the key at the cam gear or snap the camshaft before the chain will yield.

Agreed Roy, my reply is out of sequence.

__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-12-2011, 01:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Out in the Boonies of Hot, Dry, Dusty, Windy Nevada
Posts: 9,652
The Bicycle chain is subjected to grit, grime, water, and lack of luberication, so the wear is speeded up, compared to the MB chain that is is in a constant bath of "filtered" oil. (notice I didn`t say clean) so the wear on both chains is some what similar in that it is the pins and rollers that wear, that give the illusion of being streatched.

Charlie
__________________
there were three HP ratings on the OM616...

1) Not much power
2) Even less power
3) Not nearly enough power!! 240D w/auto

Anyone that thinks a 240D is slow drives too fast.

80 240D Naturally Exasperated, 4-Spd 388k DD 150mph spedo 3:58 Diff

We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-12-2011, 02:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,281
ON Hunter's post referenced above

Timing Chains Don't Last Forever

"Timing chain stretch does not exist = it is wear on the pins and bushings = Wear Elongation Measurement."

I have been trying to get people to use ' elongation ' instead of 'stretch' for years.. not making any progress either...

"Chain elongation/wear is not corrected by an offset Woodruff key.."

Technically correct... but moot if the Offset Woodfuff Key brings the situation back to where the IP can be set properly relative to the cams position.... and their position relative to the crank.

That is the value of the ' slack take up mechanism' ... the oil pressure operated ratcheting tensioner on the non load side of the chain travel.

So to the original question.. Technically you replace it when the offset keys are not able to bring it back into compliance with specs..
But the posts by Hunter reflect normal thinking on this subject I believe... wear does happen on the sprockets... so optimal situation is to renew them at the same time as the new chain. A worn sprocket will cause a new chain to wear much faster... and most of its wear happens in the first 20-30 K miles... assuming normal lubrication rules being followed.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-12-2011, 02:16 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You folks seem to be arguing over semantics, the chain does get longer as the individual contact points wear; call it whatever you like. Also the sprockets have corresponding wear and should be replaced at the same time.

One suggestion I thought was reasonable was to replace the chain/sprockets at about 250K miles, which is about half the expected life of the engine before a rebuild. This would result in the chain being replaced only once over the expected "life of the engine."
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-12-2011, 03:43 PM
Jeremy5848's Avatar
Registered Biodiesel User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sonoma Wine Country
Posts: 8,402
This is a really interesting topic for me, what with my '96 E300D (W210, OM606NA) at 275,000 miles and AFAIK the valve cover has never been off to even look at the chain. I suppose I should at least check the camshaft mark against the crank's OT mark to see if there is an "elongation" or other signs of wear on the chain and sprockets. I'd hate to have the chain break and ruin this near-perfect engine.
__________________

"Buster" in the '95

Our all-Diesel family
1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car
2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car
Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022)
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762
"Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz."
-- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-12-2011, 04:01 PM
Tanksowner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by leathermang View Post
ON Hunter's post referenced above

Timing Chains Don't Last Forever

"Timing chain stretch does not exist = it is wear on the pins and bushings = Wear Elongation Measurement."

I have been trying to get people to use ' elongation ' instead of 'stretch' for years.. not making any progress either...

"Chain elongation/wear is not corrected by an offset Woodruff key.."

Technically correct... but moot if the Offset Woodfuff Key brings the situation back to where the IP can be set properly relative to the cams position.... and their position relative to the crank.

That is the value of the ' slack take up mechanism' ... the oil pressure operated ratcheting tensioner on the non load side of the chain travel.

So to the original question.. Technically you replace it when the offset keys are not able to bring it back into compliance with specs..
But the posts by Hunter reflect normal thinking on this subject I believe... wear does happen on the sprockets... so optimal situation is to renew them at the same time as the new chain. A worn sprocket will cause a new chain to wear much faster... and most of its wear happens in the first 20-30 K miles... assuming normal lubrication rules being followed.
Forgive my seemingly naive response...how complicated of a job is it to replace the sprockets? I'm assuming it's an easier job when you have the chain out, but to have someone else do it must be expensive.
__________________
Never be ashamed to ask for help.

1985 300D
1987 300SDL
1970 Jaguar E-Type OTS
2002 Dodge Intrepid (Traded In)
2011 Ford Crown Victoria
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-12-2011, 04:06 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanksowner View Post
Forgive my seemingly naive response...how complicated of a job is it to replace the sprockets? I'm assuming it's an easier job when you have the chain out, but to have someone else do it must be expensive.
I've never done it myself, I think the cost was in the Sub-$1000 range last time I had it done.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-12-2011, 05:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig View Post
You folks seem to be arguing over semantics, the chain does get longer as the individual contact points wear; call it whatever you like. Also the sprockets have corresponding wear and should be replaced at the same time.

One suggestion I thought was reasonable was to replace the chain/sprockets at about 250K miles, which is about half the expected life of the engine before a rebuild. This would result in the chain being replaced only once over the expected "life of the engine."
I agree with those thoughts too...
Hunter and I are not arguing ... we are using the correct terms which also match what the FSM uses...
However, in defense of semantics... and one of my heroes from about the six grade...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S._I._Hayakawa

Let me say that when dealing with machines as important to us as these are.. having people understand what others are saying and meaning IS IMPORTANT....
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-12-2011, 05:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanksowner View Post
Forgive my seemingly naive response...how complicated of a job is it to replace the sprockets? I'm assuming it's an easier job when you have the chain out, but to have someone else do it must be expensive.
I have not done it... and the lower one may be a bear to get off....but you absolutely would want to make that decision while you had the chain out...
although I will say here that the instructions for changing chains is to link them together, KEEPING TENSION ON THE ONE GOING IN, so as to keep the relative position of those sprockets.....
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-12-2011, 05:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
As a bicycle mechanic, we would also talk about "stretch" rather than "elongation" but only because it's easier to say the former. Perhaps some of the customers thought the metal really did deform, but nobody who works on the things is under that impression.

Motorcycle chains tend to have o-ring seals on the pivot pins to retain lubrication and keep the dirt out (although you can buy really cheap chains that lack these). Bicycle chains have no such protection. But motorcycle chains are much more expensive to replace than bicycle chains, especially the labor. And they are much more highly stressed; probably quite comparable to the demands put on a timing chain.

Meaning is important, but it appears to me that the phrase "chain stretch" has come to mean elongation rather than deformation. Words have meanings, but meanings change.

However, I don't go quite as far as this guy:

'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.'
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-12-2011, 05:38 PM
Jeremy5848's Avatar
Registered Biodiesel User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sonoma Wine Country
Posts: 8,402
Changing the camshaft sprocket is easy. Changing the lower sprocket requires pulling the timing cover, which is a lot more work. The vacuum pump, water pump, etc., all must come off, probably the radiator to make room. Then there's the crankshaft pulley/balancer and maybe the oil pan? Would need to check the FSM to be sure but definitely a medium to difficult DIY job. Rolling in a new chain would be simple in comparison. I will also make the statement (subject to correction from those with superior knowledge) that if the camshaft sprocket does not look worn, the lower sprocket is probably OK too. Finally, changing the timing chain before it's noticeably worn will help extend the life of the sprockets. "An ounce of prevention" and all that.

Jeremy
__________________

"Buster" in the '95

Our all-Diesel family
1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car
2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car
Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022)
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762
"Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz."
-- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-12-2011, 06:40 PM
Tanksowner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTUpower View Post
I just did mine with the same mileage, plus the banana rail.
What is the banana rail? Am I going to be slapping myself in the forehead for not knowing what it is?
__________________
Never be ashamed to ask for help.

1985 300D
1987 300SDL
1970 Jaguar E-Type OTS
2002 Dodge Intrepid (Traded In)
2011 Ford Crown Victoria
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-12-2011, 06:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremy5848 View Post
Finally, changing the timing chain before it's noticeably worn will help extend the life of the sprockets. "An ounce of prevention" and all that.
That is also true for bicycles. Of course the cogs and chainwheels on a bicycle are very easy to change and not expensive (compared to yours), but it's still much cheaper in the end to replace the chain before it gets bad. The cogs will last for many years of daily use if you keep installing new chains.

If it's like a bicycle (and probably is), most of the wear will be on the crankshaft sprocket. Since there are fewer teeth across the bottom half, less chain elongation is needed before severe wear starts.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-12-2011, 06:48 PM
engatwork's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Soperton, Ga. USA
Posts: 13,646
On our '95 E300 I changed all the tensioners, slides and guides when I did the head gasket at ~260k miles. I did not change the chain at that time realizing that I'd be able to come back and roll a new one in eventually. I was going to try to get at least 300k out of it before installing a new one. The car has had a very aggressive service schedule.
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-12-2011, 07:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanksowner View Post
What is the banana rail? Am I going to be slapping myself in the forehead for not knowing what it is?
It's the largest slide rail on the passenger side of the car next to the tensioner. It's shaped like a banana and when it wears it has grooves in it.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page