Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 03-01-2016, 01:12 PM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by sneaky98gt View Post
<>I suppose the question here is whether or not a '95 model MB is in the first group of cars I described, or the 2nd.
That was my point, although perhaps not very clear. The Mercedes is in the 1st category vehicles I mentioned, and specifically the diesel version of the Mercedes tends to be like the diesel version of any pickup, any VW/Audi, it is more sought after and commands a premium.

This isn't to say that a good car for a good price isn't out there, I've seen ads for cars that I thought were a very good buy, someone on this board recently bought a nice '05 for what seemed to be a very good price, but they're hard to find nice, for a low price, and go quickly. The 124s have never really enjoyed high value like 123s did so bargains are out there.

The 124 is a balancing point of sorts between reasonable fuel economy, durability, luxury/convenience, and reasonable DIY-friendly design, and IMO nice ones are a bargain.

The '95 is also kind of an orphan, one year, no turbo, ... I like the upgrades to the body and interior but not the engine (personal choice). OTOH, I like the '87 engine, but couldn't drive one without the upgraded interior and body. The '91-'93 is in the middle of both, not exactly the engine and not all of the upgrades. All IMO good cars if the suspension, HVAC, engine maintenance, condition are all up to snuff.

__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 03-01-2016, 02:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 407
Quote:
Originally Posted by babymog View Post

The '95 is also kind of an orphan, one year, no turbo, ... I like the upgrades to the body and interior but not the engine (personal choice). OTOH, I like the '87 engine, but couldn't drive one without the upgraded interior and body. The '91-'93 is in the middle of both, not exactly the engine and not all of the upgrades. All IMO good cars if the suspension, HVAC, engine maintenance, condition are all up to snuff.
I am the opposite, I love the 95 OM606 engine, it seems to be relatively trouble-free (except for snapped glow plugs and wiring harness issues) and doesn't suffer from head/head gasket issues like some of the earlier W124's, although it can be a leaky engine in terms of annoying little fuel leaks.

With that said, it was kind of tough to get used to how doggish they can be from a stop compared to the earlier turbo cars, but once they get rolling they are great. Perhaps I am biased, or maybe I'm just used to the 0-30mph being a bit "leisurely."
__________________
1995 E300 Diesel
~300k
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 03-01-2016, 03:07 PM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
Understood, many who have the '95 like it better than all of their others. As you can see though, ... I like a little more "poke" VV and the '95 look/interior, ... had to make that myself. I had a '95 gas, can't go back to the older look and feel.
__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 03-01-2016, 04:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by babymog View Post
That was my point, although perhaps not very clear. The Mercedes is in the 1st category vehicles I mentioned, and specifically the diesel version of the Mercedes tends to be like the diesel version of any pickup, any VW/Audi, it is more sought after and commands a premium.

This isn't to say that a good car for a good price isn't out there, I've seen ads for cars that I thought were a very good buy, someone on this board recently bought a nice '05 for what seemed to be a very good price, but they're hard to find nice, for a low price, and go quickly. The 124s have never really enjoyed high value like 123s did so bargains are out there.

The 124 is a balancing point of sorts between reasonable fuel economy, durability, luxury/convenience, and reasonable DIY-friendly design, and IMO nice ones are a bargain.

The '95 is also kind of an orphan, one year, no turbo, ... I like the upgrades to the body and interior but not the engine (personal choice). OTOH, I like the '87 engine, but couldn't drive one without the upgraded interior and body. The '91-'93 is in the middle of both, not exactly the engine and not all of the upgrades. All IMO good cars if the suspension, HVAC, engine maintenance, condition are all up to snuff.
Yea, that's what I thought you were saying. I know that I'm not going to buy a 20 year old car that is going to be 100% trouble free. I just don't want to buy one that's going to cost a couple thousand dollars a year to keep on the road.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thatguy View Post
With that said, it was kind of tough to get used to how doggish they can be from a stop compared to the earlier turbo cars, but once they get rolling they are great. Perhaps I am biased, or maybe I'm just used to the 0-30mph being a bit "leisurely."
Haha, I understand. But you're got to realize, I'm coming from a non-VTEC Honda Civic. Lol. Doesn't get much worse than that.



Alright, so let's say I'm talking back and forth over Craigslist with someone who's selling a 95 E300D. Presuming everything is in decent condition, not pristine, but good paint, interior, motor runs fine, etc. what kind of money would you call a reasonable deal? KBB is showing that one with 100k miles is worth $3100-$3700 in good-excellent condition. But it sounds like a few posters here believe that $3500 is only going to get a turd.

What say you?
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 03-01-2016, 04:30 PM
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,470
Quote:
Originally Posted by sneaky98gt View Post
I admittedly haven't done more than a quick look on Autotrader and CL, but I think I saw 1 or maybe 2 listed below $7500. One had like 270k miles, and the other had around 340k miles, IIRC.

I wouldn't be surprised if there are some out there for $4000-$5000, but honestly, I think I'd prefer a $4000 '95 year model anything with 100k miles than a $4000 '05 year model of the same make with 300k miles. I could easily be flawed in my logic, but I feel a couple hundred thousand more miles is going to hurt worse than 10 years of age when it comes to long term reliability. Especially when the older model already has a pretty strong reputation of being well built.

Also, I disagree with the earlier comment about $3500 not getting anything reliable. The exact cars listed in that example are all vehicles known to drive a premium for no reason other than their name, and in those specific cases, the comment is pretty much true; $3500 is going to get you a completely ragged out, worn out heap that will cost more than it's worth to keep driving it.

But these days, $3500 can buy a pretty darn nice (relatively speaking) Japanese or even some domestic cars. With the economy picking back up, and folks having a little more money to spend, there are LOTS of people moving into newer cars (regardless of how good or bad an idea that is). That's leaving a bunch of say early to mid 2000s year model cars up for sale. $4000 can buy a bunch of different rides with under 100k miles on the clock and not a thing wrong with the car.

I suppose the question here is whether or not a '95 model MB is in the first group of cars I described, or the 2nd.
I've seen several sweet 95 E300 in the $5,000.00 range 8 my part of the country, as well as others, and they're usually gone within days. The incidence of them becoming available diminishes over time though. You've got to monitor your website sources and pounce when you see the right one for you.
__________________
'06 E320 CDI
'17 Corvette Stingray Vert
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 03-01-2016, 04:32 PM
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,470
Quote:
Originally Posted by sneaky98gt View Post
Yea, that's what I thought you were saying. I know that I'm not going to buy a 20 year old car that is going to be 100% trouble free. I just don't want to buy one that's going to cost a couple thousand dollars a year to keep on the road.



Haha, I understand. But you're got to realize, I'm coming from a non-VTEC Honda Civic. Lol. Doesn't get much worse than that.



Alright, so let's say I'm talking back and forth over Craigslist with someone who's selling a 95 E300D. Presuming everything is in decent condition, not pristine, but good paint, interior, motor runs fine, etc. what kind of money would you call a reasonable deal? KBB is showing that one with 100k miles is worth $3100-$3700 in good-excellent condition. But it sounds like a few posters here believe that $3500 is only going to get a turd.

What say you?
Without going to inspect each one in person, you won't know for sure. The sweet 95 E300 are going to fetch $5,000.00, or perhaps mid $4K, IMHO.
__________________
'06 E320 CDI
'17 Corvette Stingray Vert
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 03-01-2016, 05:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 407
IMO if you find one with a good service history, under 200k, in great shape, working A/C and no apparent issues; $5k or less would be a good price.

The wiring harness is easy enough to check, just look at the wiring at the temp sensor behind the upper radiator hose. If it's falling apart, expect to replace that. ~$450 if you DIY.

In LA/San Diego they seems to fetch at least that much; significantly more in Seattle where the bio thing is still huge.

Geographic location has a lot to do with it. I'm always jealous of those finding 05-06 CDI's for reasonable prices, in So Cal they're usually 10k or so for a nice example, in Seattle people want $15k+ for cars either 200k+ AND/OR salvage titles.
__________________
1995 E300 Diesel
~300k
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 03-01-2016, 06:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by sneaky98gt View Post
And yes, I'm still very much living like a college student. I graduated with no debt of any kind (student loans, CC, car payments, etc.), which is most of the reason why I was able to buy a house so early. This car I'm looking to buy to replace the Civic is going to be the first time I've spent more than maybe $1000 since graduating.

Good to hear you have things under control. Way too many people get deep into debt when they are young and spend their entire lives as a rat on a wheel.

Any hints as to what sort of product you are working with in the day job?
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 03-01-2016, 07:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe View Post
Without going to inspect each one in person, you won't know for sure. The sweet 95 E300 are going to fetch $5,000.00, or perhaps mid $4K, IMHO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatguy View Post
IMO if you find one with a good service history, under 200k, in great shape, working A/C and no apparent issues; $5k or less would be a good price.

The wiring harness is easy enough to check, just look at the wiring at the temp sensor behind the upper radiator hose. If it's falling apart, expect to replace that. ~$450 if you DIY.
Gotcha.

Well, in addition to the $2900 one I posted on the first page (haven't seen it yet b/c the guy has been out of town), I've come across another one that I actually like somewhat better. It's black on black (my favorite for these cars), also just over 100k miles, and looks very clean from the pics. He said the dealer replaced the glow plugs a short while ago, and that the A/C system had given no problems. No rust anywhere, non-smoker. Only problem is that the dealer said the wiring harness would need to be replaced soon, but that it wasn't showing any symptoms yet.

I've already talked him down to $3500 just via text without even seeing the car. Planning to go take a look at it later this week.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 97 SL320 View Post
Good to hear you have things under control. Way too many people get deep into debt when they are young and spend their entire lives as a rat on a wheel.

Any hints as to what sort of product you are working with in the day job?
I certainly owe a lot of that to good parents, but I've also worked my butt off for it. Studying and working a lot through school instead of partying all the time makes a heckuva difference.

The engineering group that I'm part of in my company does any and all sorts of turn-key custom engineering relating to precision measurement. That includes weight, dimensional, torque, force, flow, etc, etc. We do the mechanical and electrical design, any fabrication necessary, and then finally the software and physical integration. Pretty much, if you need to measure something, but can't buy a product off the shelf that will suit your needs, then we'll make it for you. It can be as simple as a go / no-go gauge for the diameter of a gun barrel, or as complex as a full-blown batching system at a concrete plant, or as precise as repeatably measuring the runout on a shaft to under 5 microns (that's a human hair split about 15 times ). Stuff like that.

It's really freaking awesome and I love it because:
1. It's challenging. Customers don't normally come to us until they've already tried really hard to do it themselves.
2. It's NEVER boring. We do projects for customers in virtually every industry. Automotive, aerospace, pharmaceuticals, energy, food, you name it.
3. What kind of mechanical engineer DOESN'T wish he had a job where he designed something, then had a full blown machine shop to build it, then got to have personal interaction with the customer when installing it.

And to think, someone is willing to pay me a fairly significant amount of money to do this.

Yup, living the dream. All those nights cursing at fluid dynamics or thermodynamics or controls homework paid off.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 03-01-2016, 08:12 PM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
I wanted to become an engineer so that I could work for ACME, they make so many cool things for the Coyote.
__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 03-01-2016, 08:50 PM
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,470
Quote:
Originally Posted by babymog View Post
I wanted to become an engineer so that I could work for ACME, they make so many cool things for the 'Coyote.'
Heck, I just wanted a Plymouth 'Roadrunner' in 1968/69.
__________________
'06 E320 CDI
'17 Corvette Stingray Vert
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 11-02-2016, 04:19 AM
Knappy Drag Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,725
What ever came of all this? What did the OP end up doing?

One thing that was a biggie for me when weighing the 87 OM603 vs. the early-90s OM602s vs. the 95 OM606 is the fact that the 87 OM603 is the only one of the three that came with the stronger 722.3 trans. The other two came only with the weaker 722.4 trans.

And there is no denying the fact that the OM603 is WAY more fun to live with. Driving a car that puts a smile on your face EVERY TIME you drive it is worth a few MPG penalty to me. That's why some folks buy V6 Accords instead of 4cyl ones.

And while on that topic of acceleration, if the slow acceleration of the OM606 is of no concern to the OP, then maybe the 06-07 4cyl manual 4 dr Accord should be on the table too, not just the V6 version. That would be a car that is more comparable to the OM606's acceleration and fuel economy capabilities. Now mind you, I am the LAST person who would ever recommend a 4 cyl Accord to anyone but the OP was clearly prioritizing highway fuel economy over everything else, and he was already considering a 06-07 V6 manual 4dr Accord anyways. I've NEVER shopped for a Honda but I would think that a 4 pot Accord would also have a lower price of admission than the V6 one would too.

__________________
89 300E "Benzer1" 15.924 Uncorrected
93 400E "Benzer3" 14.200 U.C.
95 E420 "Benzer4"
92 300E "Benzer5" 16.299 U.C. Future turbo CNG
87 300D "Benzer7"
87 300D "Benzer8"
87 300D "Benzer9"
87 300D/70 AMC Javelin "Sidewinder-Benzer"
87 300TD "Benzer11"
06 E320 CDI "Benzer12"
05 E320 CDI "Benzer12A"
71 AMC Javelin AMX 401 "Sidewinder"
74 AMC Hornet 401 "C.K.10" 13.63 U.C.
74 Bricklin SV1 "Presto" AMC 360 pwrd.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page