In Obama's book he did not indicate that he simply TRIED drugs. He made it clear that he "enthusiastically" used drugs.

Now that's some real executive qualification for you. The fact that the average American seems to be perfectly good with that shows just how deep in the sewer this country has sunk.

Don't worry I'm sure some slick preacher in a big nicely funded church will save you, oh and give 10% of your take home to him while your at it...

__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200

Yo swamp--I need some vintage strain seeds from the past,
perhaps some Panama Red.......... or some Pacalolo Gold

Acapulco Gold ( Bad Ass Weed) - YouTube

Yeah, if I were to believe all the druggies on this forum, it would certainly appear that being a junkie is better than living a clean life.

There are indeed some things that seem best to have a strong commitment not to indulge in.

I'm not saying you guys can't enjoy your drugs. If you choose to put your family and yourself through hell or even if you want to kill yourself, go for it. For me though, I'm quite content with my clean living.

Enjoy.

Who are "all the druggies on this forum"? Would medicinal marijuana use make someone a druggie in your book?

How did you identify them? They tested dirty or something?

What about the juicers on this forum? Do they get a free pass? If not who are they and how did you spot them.

Not picking on you but this seems to be a somewhat hyperbolic blanket condemnation and simplistic vilification.

__________________
1991 560 SEC AMG, 199k <---- 300 hp 10:1 ECE euro HV ...

1995 E 420, 170k "The Red Plum" (sold)

2015 BMW 535i xdrive awd Stage 1 DINAN, 6k, <----364 hp

1967 Mercury Cougar, 49k

2013 Jaguar XF, 20k <----340 hp Supercharged, All Wheel Drive (sold)

Is one of the things you have 'a strong commitment not to indulge in' reading?

You are so vehement in your loathing of drug use and users, and yet when a thread is started which highlights a country's effective methodology of combating the problem, you cannot even deign to read the article and see the remarkable benefits that the country has experienced.
By removing the criminal aspect of use, and treating the user rather than incarcerating the user (generally speaking treatment is cheaper than incarceration as well, so that should appeal to your fiscal conservative nature) Portugal has helped reduce the number of addicts in their country.
How can you possibly spin that into a bad thing?
Is not the goal, (and your preferred reality) that there would be no drug addicts, or at least fewer??

I am completely baffled by your take on this subject.
All I can figure is that you would rather punish people than help them, which does not seem to be a very Christian way of living.... and that is also contrary to your presented persona....

__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif

He just likes to troll, I find it amazing that he is allowed back half a million times but Brian steps one foot in the wrong and gets his head chopped off for good.

__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200

That's closer to a place between tragic and pathetic, rather than amazing.

Here's a suggestion for you. Since my opinion is so opposed to yours that you consider me a troll, click on the triangle and report whatever serious violation that I have committed. You owe it to everyone, since I'm such a conservative, you should do your part to keep my opinions away.

Oh bullshyte. Arguing to extreme to make a straw man nobody supports is a superficial approach to a difficult problem. It gives you justification to dismiss everybody who disagrees with your position, even if their position is not too different from your own. We are not 'either with you or against you'. There are a wide array of opinions, not just yours and everybody else's.

Let's start from the simple: Do you own your own body? If your answer is in the affirmative then it is yours to treat and dispose of as you wish. If the gov owns your body then the gov gets to tell you how to use it.

Take abortion, for example. If a woman owns her body then the gov has no business in her uterus. If the gov owns her body then the gov has a stake in how she uses her uterus.

If the gov owns your body then the gov can (and should) have an interest in your medical condition -- the sole justification for socialized medicine.

If you cede ownership responsibility of your body to the government or anybody else then you are in essence, their slave. It's not your body, it's theirs.

In the past criminal organizations were involved with numbers games, drugs, alcohol and protection rackets. They still are but they call themselves something a little different.

I think a LOT of people didnt read past the threads title before commenting, and therein lies the problem. Take off the blinders, things cant get much worse, , , the gospel according to 'Reefer Madness'!

Larry is amazing. I've never encountered anyone who manages to adhere so closely to the creed that morality and critical thought are diametrically opposed.

__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13

I find it quite interesting that voicing my opinion is considered by some to be trolling.

I'm sure if my opinion was not opposed to that of those accusing me of trolling, they would not be making such accusations. Quite pathetic.

I suppose that I could stop the trolling accusation by just lying down and agreeing with whatever is presented. Sorry, but I'm not a "yes man."

Another interesting point is some of the people on here that seem to present themselves as open minded. Yeah, they're open minded to any opinion that agrees with their own. Again, pathetic.