|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Which trannys compatible with a 126?
Sometime in the near future I plan on a tranny rebuild. Should I stick with the stock 722.324 (right?) tranny, albeit one with any improved parts, or replace it with a later tranny? The question being, are there any better trannys from later model MBs that would bolt up to a 126 with no or light modifications?
__________________
'86 420SE Euro 904 Midnight Blue, Gray Velour Dad bought it new, now I own it. "A Mercedes-Benz is like a fine wine, it only gets better with age." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Mike, awesome site. So is the only one I could replace mine with is the 91 722.355? Or the 350 from the 560? Does anyone know what is better about these than my 324?
What is the best, non-original tranny (even from other bodies) I can put in mine that will fit with little or no mods?
__________________
'86 420SE Euro 904 Midnight Blue, Gray Velour Dad bought it new, now I own it. "A Mercedes-Benz is like a fine wine, it only gets better with age." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry to bring this up, again...
I was using the SEARCH function and found this posting. I recently purchased a 1987 420SEL with a transmission that has been recently rebuilt. All the charts show a different model for the '86-88 cars as being a 722.324, whereas my '91 420SEL shows as having a 722.355. Both indicate a 2nd gear start, etc.
Are these just a matter of modulator pressure vs. being really different (OK, non-swapable) transmissions? In a nutshell, can one safely replace a 722.355 with a 722.324, or can it be modified to work properly? Thanks to all for your kind consideration? Cheers!
__________________
'91 420 SEL @ 199K, '92 SVX @ 181K, '93 SC400 @ 86K, '93 Kaw ZX-11 @ 30K, '87 F250 @ 181K , 2001 Valkyrie Interstate @ 6K, Y2K Honda NightHawk 250 with 1.5K, '88 420SEL I.@ 179K & the 2nd latest, an '88 420SEL II.@ 210K runnin' parts car, '85 F150 300/NP435 |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|