Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 12-29-2009, 02:48 PM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuskyMan View Post
time to bring in the German high speed mag lev trains. 300 MPH comfort, starbucks coffee served up along with your favorite reading materials.

no idiot drivers on the road, no high priced gasoline, plus reduce the maintenance cost on your cars, simply leave the driving to the train operator.

Europe, Japan and now China are doing it, the United States, of course, will be the last to get a descent high speed rail system.
And is that more terrorist proof than the airplane? I think not.

True. Now, lets talk of it like the bus or any other public transport. Will it go exactly where I want? Probably not. How about leave when I feel like it? Probably not. Who will run it? Govt? Oh, that will work all right. Gives them another money pit to play with. No thanx.

Europe and Japan are a lot denser than we are and thus it might work there. People are a not as independent minded as we were. It might not work with the logistics and mentality we have.

__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 12-29-2009, 02:50 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billybob View Post
How will you go about guarding the thousands of miles of rail systems that such trains run on from the sabotage that could easily cause a catastrophic wreck at 300 MPH? What would stop an attacker from driving a cement mixer into the path of a train traveling 300MPH?

I’m a big fan of train travel but from a security point of view it’s a disaster waiting to happen.
note the photographs in the following link. note the train has it's own rail system built high above the earth, far from interference from cars or trucks. as far as sabotage, simply place a 1,000,000 volt electric fence along both sides of the rail system. any wannabe terrorists would first have to figure out how to climb up to the train level, then figure out how to cross the 1,000,000 volt electric fence barrier. passengers could watch the Al-Qaeda whackos shock themselves to death while enjoying a cup of coffee. fun!

http://www.gluckman.com/Maglev.html
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 12-29-2009, 02:51 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by okyoureabeast View Post
Like I said earlier, the terrorists have already won.

We are searched at airports, treated like crap at US border crossings, and within 100 miles of the border can be searched without warrants! All in the name of stopping drugs or terrorists http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-85472575.html

It's sad. I don't live my life in fear. If I die I die. Life is just cruel and unexpected like that. We can prevent as much as we can, but anyone who is truly determined to do drastic amounts of harm will be able to do so.

I am truly saddened by what I see in this country.
Yup, it's going to keep getting worse. At some point, I expect to be living elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 12-29-2009, 02:52 PM
Pooka
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 664
A totally unworkable solution to all of this is to just do what I did when I needed to travel: Take a company owned private jet.

It is really very easy. You just call the company air operations center and tell them you need a jet to go to where you are going. Then you take a taxi to the airport and your jet is waiting for you with two pilots and lots of food and even fresh flowers on board.

I know this will be a bit difficult if you don't work for a major oil company, so get those resumes out there!

I have not flown commercialy since 1978, so I am really a bit out of touch with all of this security stuff. And, now that I am retired, I drive everywhere I go.

See how easy that is?
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 12-29-2009, 02:53 PM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig View Post
Yup, it's going to keep getting worse. At some point, I expect to be living elsewhere.
But where? I suppose if you are lucky, they won't reach it before you die of other causes. If not, you are just moving from one place to the other. Might as well stay put and slug it out. If they want to die, oblige them. Problem is we don't have the stones to wipe them out by killing every man, woman, child.
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 12-29-2009, 02:54 PM
I miss my MBZ
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 563
Can you guys cite anywhere in this country (or the world for that matter) where trains have made a profit ?

I'm not trying to be snarky, but I have not heard of any, and if anyone is going to propose that trains (slow or fast) are a good business option, then I'd like to hear about a 'success story'
...or, just let them rest on the 'save the earth' laurels - thats really enough for me, but I'd feel better voting for it if I thought that it was a good financial decision.

-John
__________________
2009 Kia Sedona
2009 Honda Odyssey EX-L
12006 Jetta Pumpe Duse
(insert Mercedes here)

Husband, Father, sometimes friend =)
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 12-29-2009, 02:54 PM
Pavka007's Avatar
Alba Gu Bràth
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here, there...
Posts: 247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pooka View Post
But the biggest deteriant is the airline industry. There was a line like this proposed to run between Dallas and Houston about 20 years ago and the airlines fought it tooth and nail. I guess it never occurred to the airlines that they should invest in the rail line for if they had it would be a big source of revenue to them now. (That is, if it could be done at a profit.)

Spot on...Just look at Virgin group in the UK. Richard Branson is running planes AND trains in the UK.



__________________
http://i680.photobucket.com/albums/v...7/scotflag.gif http://i680.photobucket.com/albums/v.../scot2flag.gif

"If women are so bloody perfect at multitasking how come they can't have a headache and sex at the same time?"
Billy Connolly
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 12-29-2009, 02:57 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by aklim View Post
And is that more terrorist proof than the airplane? I think not.

True. Now, lets talk of it like the bus or any other public transport. Will it go exactly where I want? Probably not. How about leave when I feel like it? Probably not. Who will run it? Govt? Oh, that will work all right. Gives them another money pit to play with. No thanx.

Europe and Japan are a lot denser than we are and thus it might work there. People are a not as independent minded as we were. It might not work with the logistics and mentality we have.
europeans are more willing to park the car and take the high speed rail than we are. a friend of mine recently traveled to Stuttgart on her way to Luxembourg. she was able to travel to her destination via rail, no cars were involved in the trip.

in contrast, people in the United States are MARRIED to their cars (in reality, the western equivalent of a horse). we'd rather choke on the other guy's exhaust and search for parking than give it up for high speed rail. go figure.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 12-29-2009, 02:58 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by aklim View Post
But where? I suppose if you are lucky, they won't reach it before you die of other causes. If not, you are just moving from one place to the other. Might as well stay put and slug it out. If they want to die, oblige them. Problem is we don't have the stones to wipe them out by killing every man, woman, child.
I'm not afraid of terrorists, I'm just annoyed by the americans overreaction to them.

I can live wherever there is interesting work, don't really care about nations and their little spats.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 12-29-2009, 02:58 PM
Pooka
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 664
Warren Buffet just bought the Burlington Northen-Santa Fe line. But that is freight and not passanger rail.

I think your question would be 'Where has passanger rail made a profit.'

The Orient Express does well. It costs a bit more than air travel, though.

The South African Blue Line might be a money maker, but I think the RSA gov is involved in that.
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 12-29-2009, 03:14 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cape Cod Massachusetts
Posts: 1,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pooka View Post
As far as a high speed train running into anythng....

High speed trains have NO grade crossings. They either go over or under grade crossings so they never have any reason to slow down. This is one reason they cost to much to build.

Security of the right-of-way is something that can be accomplished. Pipelines and refineries have very good security, and some pipeline companies have even considered leasing their right-of-way to rail lines so the high speed trains could be a source of revenue to them.

One big deterant to high speed rail, as odd as this may sound, are the land owners whose property the line would cross. These trains scare the life out of cattle and make plowing a field rather difficult.

But the biggest deteriant is the airline industry. There was a line like this proposed to run between Dallas and Houston about 20 years ago and the airlines fought it tooth and nail. I guess it never occoured to the airlines that they should invest in the rail line for if they had it would be a big source of revenue to them now. (That is, if it could be done at a profit.)
If terrorist attackers where widely know to follow all traffic laws and only cross rail lines when the barriers and lights signaled then this might be important! Having traveled on the French TGV a decade ago from my seat you could see miles of opportunity where the only impediment is a fence; I can assure you a psychopath can drive a large object into its path without a whole lot of effort. A homicide bomber with a large vehicular bomb on an overpass above or in an underpass below would have significant success.

Regarding the comparison between the security that would be required of a 300 MPH train and the present day pipeline infrastructure is false. In this country there has seldom been a concerted effort of individual and groups willing to die in the process, the same would likely not be true for jihadi bent on causing mass casualties. In other places where pipelines are targets the security is regularly breached, example in Iraq and places like Nigeria abound. As an aside I regularly hunt a couple natural gas pipelines in my area and would have little problem driving a machine into the area and excavating a hole the size of a couple houses.

The big deterrent for passenger trains of any type is financial, virtually every one around the world and here in this country are taxpayer subsidized to an enormous extent. The cost of acquiring, constructing and maintaining such enormous expanses of infrastructure is staggering, if effective security aimed at preventing real threat possibilities was factored it would make airline security costs look cheap. The reality is with air travel basically security is concentrated at either end but once the travelling public leaves the ground it’s pretty much a free ride, with rail you would need basically the same level of security at each boarding and disembarking termination and you would have to maintain security along the entire route at all times. If the jihadist elements ever elevate their game to include a credible surface to air destructive capability that would put air travel on threat parity with high speed rail travel.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 12-29-2009, 03:14 PM
Pooka
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 664
Just to throw some thoughts out there....

Aircraft took over from trains because, supossedly, they offered speed. What they really offered was a chance to be more productive since you could get to your destination in hours and not days. Airlines charged more, but you could make more money if you took them.

Now... You can, in some cases, work with your laptop and cell phone like you are at the office. If you board a high-speed in Dallas bound for St. Louis you could be there in three hours (with a one hour stop in Tulsa) which is about one hour more than by air. Chicago would be a six hour trip from Dallas, really seven since you would need to be there about an hour ahead of time to check-in and what not.

It would also be comfortable and not so much subject to delays. You could be as productive as if you were in your own office if you wished, or you could wander into the dining car and/or smoking car and really relax.

I am old enough to remember rail travel. It was slow and boring, but it was better than being beat to death on a piston driven airliner. When Jets took over it was good-by rail!

Could it be time to say good-by airtravel?
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 12-29-2009, 03:31 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 57,422
When we were in Berlin 3 years ago, we took a 1 hour train ride to visit some relatives out of town. We walked to the subway from our hotel. Took the subway to the main train station that just opened. Bought a train ticket at the kiosk. Went to the right platform. Waited 10 min for the train and hopped on when it got their. Found a seat, and enjoyed the ride. No muss, no fuss.

I know it would take a huge investment to get a system like that up and running here in the states, but we have to start some where. And if we do not start now, it will cost even more later on.

I do not think air travel has to say good bye. I think they can work in tandem. Plans for long distance, trains for shorter distance.
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 12-29-2009, 03:35 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 57,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by aklim View Post
True. Now, lets talk of it like the bus or any other public transport. Will it go exactly where I want? Probably not. How about leave when I feel like it? Probably not.

Planes do not leave when you want them too or go where you want them too. They leave on a specified schedule and go to a airport. Trains leave on a schedule and go to a train station some of which are at airports. Go figure. Take a train to the airport to take a plane somewhere else.... wow. Might be on to something there.
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 12-29-2009, 03:54 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmash View Post
Planes do not leave when you want them too or go where you want them too. They leave on a specified schedule and go to a airport. Trains leave on a schedule and go to a train station some of which are at airports. Go figure. Take a train to the airport to take a plane somewhere else.... wow. Might be on to something there.
last I heard, Las Colinas, Texas was working on that very idea. they WERE building a train from Las Colinas out to DF/W. don't know if the idea is still in play, but if not, it should be.

the biggest problem I can see is that most people in the United States are still very much MARRIED to their cars. the idea of parking the car and taking a 300 MPH elevated mag lev train might never get off the ground. they'd rather tailgate my a** at 70 MPH and then pass me as if their a** is on fire. cars are today's equivalent of the horse. every man has to have his horse.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2026 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page